In certain circumstances, the analyst must prepare copies of the relevant medical evidence before preparing a MSS referral form in the Appeals Review Processing System (ARPS). Copies of the relevant medical evidence are necessary when:

• •

  The case is paper; or

• •

  The claimant filed a subsequent application.

When there is a subsequent application and:

• •

  The current claim(s) file is paper, the analyst will send MSS paper copies of the applicable medical evidence from the subsequent claim(s) file with the other medical evidence from the current paper claim(s) file.

• •

  The current and subsequent claim(s) file are electronic, the analyst will electronically copy the documents from the subsequent file to the file currently pending with the AC (specifically identifying the documents in the Pertinent Factors text box and adding a “CC” to show the information was copied from a subsequent file).

• •

  The claim(s) file is electronic but the subsequent application claim(s) file is paper, the analyst will consult with the branch chief to determine the most efficient process of forwarding all the relevant information to MSS.

The analyst will create a “New MSS Referral Diary” in ARPS, specifically:

• •

  Indicating the period at issue;

• •

  Identifying only the body system(s) to be evaluated by the MSS consulting physician;

• •

  Entering specific instructions in the “Pertinent Factors” text box, including the listing(s) and body system(s) the MSS consulting physician should analyze;

• •

  Discussing relevant medical history, records, findings, examinations, and/or tests in the “Pertinent Factors” text box, including specific references (by exhibit and page number) to relevant objective evidence and a summary of relevant oral testimony;

• •

  Noting in the “Pertinent Factors” text box that paper copies of evidence have been forwarded to MSS (when a paper file is involved); and

• •

  Completing the “Medical questions or problems” and “Remarks” sections with adequate specificity.

The analyst must route referrals to MSS through the branch chief. The branch chief will ensure that the analyst properly completed the referral before forwarding the request to MSS.

The AC only exhibits an MSS report if the AC issues a decision that relies on the report. Therefore, until the AC evaluates the report and determines the appropriate course of action, the reports are associated with the record as follows:

• •

  In electronic cases, MSS will upload the report to the Private section of the electronic folder.

• •

  In paper cases, MSS will route the report to the analyst in a private AC paper folder.

Analysts must keep in mind that MSS reports are advisory in nature. The analyst must consider the entire file, including MSS reports, in making a recommendation to the AC.

When the AC intends to issue a less than fully favorable decision that will rely on an MSS report, the AC must proffer the MSS report, as set forth in Hearings, Appeals and Litigation Law manual HA 01320.016. In electronic cases, if the B member adjudicator agrees with the recommendation, the B member will move the MSS report from the Private section of the electronic folder to the F section.

When the AC relies on an MSS report, the AC must exhibit the report. However, when the AC does not rely on the report, the AC does not exhibit the report or associate the report with the record.

To exhibit an MSS report:

• •

  In electronic cases, if the B member adjudicator agrees with the recommendation to issue a decision relying on an MSS report, the B member will move the MSS report from the Private section of the electronic folder to the F section, or, if the MSS report was proffered, ensure that the report was already moved to the F section. The B member will then exhibit the report and confirm that the exhibit number cited in the draft decision matches the actual exhibit number.

• •

  In paper cases, the analyst will add the paper copy of the MSS report to the F section of the folder and add the report to the exhibit list at the time the AC decision is drafted.