A claimant must inform or submit to the Social Security Administration
(SSA) all evidence, in its entirety, known to him or her that relates
to whether or not he or she is blind or disabled. See 20
CFR 404.1512 and 416.912.
If a claimant has appointed a representative, the representative
must help the claimant obtain any information or evidence that the
claimant must submit. See 20
CFR 404.1740(b)(1)-(2) and 416.1540(b)(1)-(2).
This duty applies at the Appeals Council (AC) if the evidence relates
to the period on or before the date of the administrative law judge
(ALJ) decision (or the claimant's date last insured, when applicable).
Evidence generally does not include
a representative's analysis of the claim or oral or written communications
between a claimant and his or her representative that are subject
to the attorney-client privilege or that would be subject to the
attorney-client privilege if a non-attorney representative was an
attorney. See 20
CFR 404.1513(b) and 416.913(b).
If a claimant informs the AC about additional evidence, the
AC will not obtain or consider additional evidence as a basis to
grant review unless the claimant meets one of the good cause exceptions
set forth at 20
CFR 404.970(b) and 416.1470(b).
If the AC finds that the claimant meets a good cause exception,
the AC will follow the procedures below and will evaluate the additional
evidence with the other evidence of record to determine whether
to grant review. See 20
CFR 404.935, 404.970, 416.1435,
and 416.1470.
When the AC evaluates a decision
that is not based on an application for benefits and involves title
XVI of the Social Security Act (e.g., age 18 redeterminations, continuing
disability reviews, terminations), the AC considers the evidence
in the hearing record and any additional evidence it believes is
material to an issue being considered.
When a claimant informs the AC about additional evidence and
the AC finds that the claimant meets a good cause exception or the
AC evaluates a decision that is not based on an application for
benefits and involves title XVI of the Social Security Act (e.g.,
age 18 redeterminations, continuing disability reviews, terminations),
Office of Appellate Operations (OAO) staff will generally attempt
to develop the evidence only if the claimant clearly indicates that
the evidence relates to the period on or before the date of the
ALJ hearing decision.
When the AC finds that the claimant meets a good cause exception
or the AC evaluates a decision that is not based on an application
for benefits and involves title XVI of the Social Security Act (e.g.,
age 18 redeterminations, continuing disability reviews, terminations),
and the additional evidence is related to the period on or before
the date of the ALJ hearing decision, OAO staff will make necessary
attempts, referenced in this section, to obtain the evidence. In
many instances, the AC must also proffer the evidence associated
with the claim(s) file to the claimant and appointed representative,
if any. For detailed instructions on when proffer is required at
the AC level, see Hearings, Appeals and Litigation Law (HALLEX)
manual HA 01320.016.
A representative may inform SSA
about evidence that relates to whether or not the claimant is blind
or disabled. See 20
CFR 404.970(b) and 416.1470(b).
A representative also has an affirmative duty to act with reasonable
promptness to help obtain the information or evidence that the claimant
must submit under the regulations and forward the information or evidence
to SSA for consideration as soon as practicable. See 20
CFR 404.1740(b)(1) and 416.1540(b)(1).
If a representative is believed to present a pattern of not acting
with reasonable promptness to help obtain and forward the evidence
to SSA, an administrative appeals judge will consider whether circumstances
warrant a referral to the Office of the General Counsel (OGC) as
a possible violation of our rules. See HALLEX HA 01110.050 for instructions on making
referrals to OGC.