Last Update: 4/20/2015 (Transmittal I-3-107)
HA 01310.003 Hearing Office Re-Activates Case Before Request for Review Processed
Renumbered from HALLEX section I-3-1-3
In some cases, the claimant may request review from the Appeals
Council (AC), but the hearing office re-activates the hearing level case
before AC staff establishes the request for review in the case processing
system. This situation usually occurs when an administrative law judge
(ALJ) wants to amend his or her prior action in favor of the claimant
and the ALJ is unaware of the request for review.
Even though a hearing level case has already been re-activated
in the hearing level system, the AC must respond to the request for
review. However, because a hearing level case has been re-activated,
establishing a case in the case processing system would require the
AC to convert an electronic claim(s) file to a paper claim(s) file. To
avoid this, AC staff will not establish a case in the case processing
system when responding to the request for review. Rather, AC staff will
prepare correspondence that gives notice to the claimant and appointed
representative (if any) that the AC is not acting on the request for
review. The letter will explain the particular circumstances involved
in the case and clearly state that the AC is not acting on the request
for review because the ALJ is reconsidering his or her prior action. AC
staff will ensure that a copy of the request for review and the AC's
correspondence are associated with the claim(s) file.
If AC staff notices that a hearing
office is regularly re-activating a case rather than following the
procedures outlined in Hearings, Appeals and Litigation Law manual HA 01240.011, he or
she will notify the branch chief. If appropriate, the branch chief will
ask the Executive Director's Office to provide feedback to the hearing
operation.