As the result of the Parisi by Cooney v. Chater reduction of benefits under the family
            maximum in cases involving dual entitlement – Title II of the Social Security Act)
            court case decision, Acquiescence Ruling 97-1(1), now applies to all States. Under
            this ruling, we will consider only the benefit actually payable when reducing the
            benefits of dually entitled auxiliaries or survivors. (The benefit payable to the
            dually entitled person is the amount before any applicable reduction for age, government
            pension offset (GPO) for months of entitlement prior to January 2024, or workers'
            compensation offset (WC).) Pay any resulting increase to other auxiliaries or survivors
            entitled on the same record.
         
         
            
            
               
               Only pay this increase to others who are not dually entitled. If there are no other
                  beneficiaries who are not dually entitled, this change does not apply. As used in
                  the following section, the phrase decision or determination means any decision by
                  a court, Appeals Council, or administrative law judge or any initial or reconsideration
                  determination that awards benefits.