I. INTRODUCTION
               An application for surviving child's benefits was filed on behalf of Catherine F~,
                  SSN ~, on the account of the deceased wage earner Wilner D~, SSN ~. Mr. D~ was domiciled
                  in Missouri at the time of his death. An adoption certificate submitted with the application
                  shows that Catherine was adopted by Wilner D~ in Haiti. Because there is not a precedent
                  opinion regarding the requirements of a Haitian adoption, you have asked whether the
                  file in the instant case contains satisfactory evidence that Catherine F~ was legally
                  adopted by Wilner D~ according to Haitian law in order to award her surviving child's
                  benefits.
               
               For the reasons explained below, we conclude that the adoption of Catherine F~ was
                  valid under Haitian law and that Catherine F~ should be recognized as the legally
                  adopted child of Wilner D~ for the purpose of receiving surviving child's benefits
                  beginning June 29, 2005.
               
               II. FACTS
               Catherine F~ was born in Ft. Lauderdale, Florida on December 31, 1990. Her mother,
                  Benita D~, and her biological father Robert F~, were divorced on January 1, 1991.
                  On September 1, 2001, Benita D~ married Wilner D~ in Haiti. Ms. D~ and Mr. D~ had
                  become naturalized citizens of the United States on April 13, 1998, and August 23,
                  1999, respectively. The naturalization papers show that Ms. D~ was born on January
                  8, 1963, and Mr. D~ was born on May 25, 1958. On December 18, 2002, Mr. D~ adopted
                  Catherine F~ in Haiti. On June 7, 2004, Mr. D~ passed away in New Madrid, Missouri.
                  The adoption was ratified by a Civil Tribunal on June 27, 2005, and was recorded in
                  the civil status registry on June 29, 2005. On September 14, 2005, Mrs. D~ filed for
                  surviving child's benefits for Catherine on Wilner D~'s record.
               
               III.  DISCUSSION
               ADOPTION LAW
               The Social Security Act does not define legal adoption. The Commissioner of Social
                  Security, however, may "prescribe such rules and regulations as the Commissioner determines
                  necessary or appropriate to carry out the functions of the Administrations." 42 U.S.C.
                  § 902(a)(5). When an adoption takes place in a foreign country, SSA applies the adoption
                  laws of that country to determine whether an individual is the insured's legally adopted
                  child. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.356 (2005); Program Operations Manual System (POMS) GN 00306.135. At least one party to the adoption, either the child or the adopting parent, must
                  have been domiciled or actually residing in that jurisdiction at the time of the adoption.
                  The physical presence of one or both of the parties within that jurisdiction does
                  not make the adoption valid. See POMS GN
                     00306.135.
               
               POMS GN 00307.220 specifies that evidence of a legal adoption in a foreign country
                  can be an adoption decree, however, it is acceptable only if "there is a precedent
                  opinion on the requirement for such an adoption." Because there is not currently a
                  precedent opinion on the requirements of a valid adoption in Haiti we requested advice
                  from the Western Law Division of the Law Library of the Library of Congress (response
                  attached).
               
               Adoption in Haiti is permitted only for children under sixteen years old. The prospective
                  adopting parent(s) may be either any person over thirty-five years old or two spouses,
                  not legally separated, who have been married for at least ten years, with one of the
                  spouses being over thirty-five years old. The prospective adoptive parents must be
                  at least nineteen years older than the children they propose to adopt. However, if
                  the latter are children of one spouse, the required difference of age is only ten
                  years. The President also may grant a dispensation reducing the age difference requested.
               
               At the time of the adoption, the prospective adopting parent must neither have children
                  nor descendents of his or her own, unless the President of the Republic grants a dispensation.
                  A prior adoption of a child, however, does not hinder new adoptions by the same adopting
                  parent, if the prospective parent can establish that he or she can handle the economic
                  obligations. A Haitian can adopt or be adopted by a foreigner. The law is silent as
                  to any residency requirement and does not address the adoption of a foreigner by another
                  foreigner in Haiti.
               
               The biological parents of the child must consent to the adoption. If one of the biological
                  parents is dead or has no possibility of expressing his or her wishes, the consent
                  of the other suffices. When the parents are legally separated or divorced, consent
                  will be given by the parent with custody of the child. In this case, a notification
                  of the adoption act must be made to the parent who did not give his or her consent,
                  and the ratification of the adoption act can only take place thirty days after this
                  notification. The court must hear a parent who presents a notification of his or her
                  opposition to the adoption within the thirty-day period before it can ratify the adoption
                  act. Consent may be given either at the time the adoption act is drafted or by a separate
                  authentic act in front of a notary, a Judge of Peace, or, if abroad, before a diplomatic
                  agent.
               
               The prospective adopting parent(s), the minor, and the minor's legal representative(s)
                  must appear before the Justice of the Peace with jurisdiction over the domicile of
                  the adopting parent (or before the Justice of the Peace with jurisdiction over the
                  domicile of the adoptee if the adopting person is a foreign national) to draw up the
                  adoption act. The adopting parent must produce documents establishing the required
                  age difference and a medical certificate stating that he or she is not suffering from
                  a contagious illness.
               
               The adoption act then must be ratified by the Civil Tribunal for the domicile of the
                  adopting parent. The Tribunal verifies whether all the legal requirements have been
                  met and whether the adoption will result in a real improvement for the adoptee. The
                  Prosecutor's office has thirty days to appeal a judgment ratifying an adoption act,
                  while the parties to the adoption have thirty days to appeal the refusal of the court
                  to ratify an adoption act. Ratification of the adoption act is pronounced at a public
                  hearing.
               
               The adoption becomes effective against third parties only after the recording of the
                  ratification judgment in the civil status register. However, the parties themselves
                  are bound to a parent-child relationship the moment the adoption act is entered before
                  the Justice of the Peace. Adoption generates the same rights and obligations that
                  are derived from legitimate or natural filiations. The acte
                     d'adoption appearing on the civil status register serves as the official adoption decree.
               
               If the adopting parent dies after the adoption act has been drawn before the Justice
                  of the Peace and after the ratification before the Civil Tribunal has been filed,
                  the adoption procedures continue and the Civil Tribunal may ratify the adoption.
               
               Based on the documents provided, it appears that the adoption of Catherine F~ by Wilner
                  D~ was valid under Haitian law, and became effective against third parties on June
                  29, 2005. Catherine F~ was almost twelve years old when she was adopted by Mr. D~,
                  who was forty-four years old at the time, which satisfies the age requirements. A
                  judgment of the Civil Tribunal of Petit-Goave ratified the adoption on June 27, 2005.
                  The judgment shows Mr. D~ as the petitioner and that he had his primary domicile in
                  Petit-Goave. Although the judgment was rendered after the death of Mr. D~, the 1974
                  Decree on Adoption provides that adoption procedures can continue, and the court may
                  ratify the adoption, when the adopting parent dies after the adoption act has been
                  drawn before the Justice of the Peace and a filing for ratification before the Civil
                  Tribunal has occurred.
               
               The ratification judgment states that Mr. D~ appeared before the Justice of the Peace
                  of Petit-Goave to adopt Catherine on December 18, 2002, and that Catherine's mother
                  gave her consent to the adoption. Because the Tribunal verifies whether all the legal
                  requirements have been met, we assume the Tribunal determined that Catherine's mother
                  had custody of Catherine. On June 27, 2005, the Tribunal ratified the adoption act
                  drawn on December 18, 2002, and ruled that Catherine was to be known under the name
                  Catherine F~ D~. The Public Prosecutor agreed with the Judge's findings. In addition,
                  the Tribunal ordered that the ratification of the adoption be entered on the appropriate
                  civil register.
               
               In conformity with the ratification judgment, an acte
                     d'adoption was drawn in the register of civil status on June 29, 2005, reproducing the terms
                  of such judgment. This adoption act serves as the official adoption decree.
               
               MARRIAGE LAW 
               To account for the possibility that the adoption was invalid, we also requested information
                  from the Law Library of the Library of Congress regarding the requirements of a valid
                  marriage under Haitian law. If the marriage between Benita D~ and Wilner D~ was valid,
                  Catherine could also be entitled to surviving child's benefits as the number holder's
                  step-child, provided all other eligibility requirements are met. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.357 (2005); POMS GN 00305.020, GN 00306.230.
               
               Haitian Civil Code directs that a marriage be celebrated publicly before an "official
                  of the civil status" for the domicile of one of the spouses. Domicile, for marriage
                  purposes, is established by six months of continuous habitation in the same commune
                  (smallest administrative unit). Before the celebration of the marriage, the "official
                  of the civil status" must post two publications, at an interval of eight days, on
                  the door of the civil status office. Such publications state the first names, last
                  names, professions, and domiciles of the engaged couple, as well as the place where
                  the marriage is to be celebrated. If the couple resides in different communes, publications
                  must be done in each commune. The officer of the civil status must request the birth
                  certificate of both persons.
               
               Opposition to the marriage may be filed during the publication period. On a day designated
                  by the couple, the "official of the civil status," in the presence of at least two
                  and at most four witnesses, will make a reading of the information contained in the
                  birth certificate of each party, the duties and rights of the spouses, respectively,
                  and receive the parties consent. At the end of the ceremony, the "official of the
                  civil status" must draw up a marriage act at once. The marriage act must include the
                  following: (1) first names, last names, professions, ages, dates and places of birth,
                  and domicile of the spouses; (2) first names, last names, and professions of the fathers
                  and mothers; (3) consent of the mothers and fathers or legal guardians, if necessary;
                  (4) information concerning the publications; (5) oppositions, if any; (6) mention
                  of a contract of marriage, if any; (7) declaration of the parties to take each other
                  for spouses and the pronouncement of their union by the "official of the civil status;"
                  and (8) the names, ages, and professions of the witnesses and their legal capacity
                  as adults.
               
               Applying these requirements to the marriage between Wilner D~ and Benita D~, the marriage
                  appears to be valid. The marriage certificate contains all the required information
                  listed in the Civil Code, including the publications which took place on the Sundays
                  of September 9, 2001, and September 16, 2001. It states that there was no opposition
                  to the marriage. It shows that both spouses were, at the time, domiciled in Haiti,
                  with Mr. D~ living in Petit-Goave and Ms. D~ living in Port-au-Prince. In the margin
                  of the copy of the marriage certificate, the page number of the register and the record
                  number of the marriage are listed.
               
               IV. CONCLUSION
               We conclude that the aforementioned adoption was valid under Haitian law and complies
                  with the requirements of POMS GN 00306.135 and GN 00307.220 beginning June 29, 2005. The marriage was also valid under Haitian
                  law, entitling Catherine to surviving child's benefits as the numberholder's step-child,
                  provided all other eligibility requirements are met.
               
               Frank V. S~ III
Chief Counsel, Region VII
               
               By
 Kristin L. E~
 Assistant Regional Counsel