A claimant or an appointed representative may request
an extension of time (EOT) to submit additional evidence or
arguments to the Appeals Council (AC) in support of a request
for review. The AC will accept an EOT request for this purpose
either in writing or by telephone. When received by telephone, AC
staff will document the request on a form SSA-5002
(Report of Contact) and associate the form with the claim(s) file.
EOT requests are distinct from, but
may be submitted with, a statement informing the AC about additional
evidence. For specific processing instructions when a claimant or
appointed representative informs the AC about additional evidence that
relates to the period on or before the date of the administrative
law judge decision, see Hearings, Appeals and Litigation Law
(HALLEX) manual HA
01320.015.
For an initial EOT request, the AC provides the claimant
or appointed representative 25 days from the date of the notice
granting the EOT, even if the claimant or appointed representative
requests an EOT for more than 25 days. If the claimant or appointed
representative requires additional time, they must submit a subsequent
EOT request. For a subsequent EOT request received after the AC has
issued the notice granting the initial EOT, the AC will consider
whether the claimant or appointed representative provided good
cause for requesting a subsequent EOT. In evaluating whether there
is good cause, the AC will use the standards in 20
CFR 404.911 and 416.1411.
If the AC finds there is no good cause for requesting a subsequent
EOT, the AC will deny the EOT and continue processing the request
for review. Unless there is a specific request from the claimant or
the appointed representative for a shortened timeframe, the AC must
ensure the claimant receives the full 25 days based on the initial EOT
request before processing the case, even if the AC denies a request for
a subsequent EOT.
However, it is not always necessary for the AC to respond to an
EOT request before performing a substantive review (see HALLEX HA 01320.001). Certain
circumstances may render the request moot. For example, if the AC has
received the additional evidence or arguments mentioned in the EOT
request when the analyst examines the claim(s) file, the EOT request
may be moot. In these circumstances the AC may address an initial or
subsequent EOT request with its action on the request for review. The
analyst will add the following language to the action document, modified
as appropriate:
On [date of request], a request
was made for an extension of time to submit additional evidence and/or
argument. These materials have been received.
If the EOT request is for the
purpose of filing a civil action or requesting AC review, these
instructions do not apply. Rather, for an EOT to file a civil
action, the AC uses the instructions in HALLEX HA 01390.092. For an EOT to request
review, see HALLEX HA
01310.001 E.