PR 07215.034 New Mexico
A. PR 00-033 Request for Formal Legal Opinion Regarding Purchase of Property by Representative Payees on Behalf of Minor Children in New Mexico
DATE: May 5, 1999
In Region VI (Dallas), a minor in the State of New Mexico may hold title to either real or personal property without restriction as to the age of the minor or the type of property that may be held.
This memorandum responds to your request for our opinion on the ability of a minor to hold title to certain types of property and how the property must be titled in the State of New Mexico. You state that the regions have received numerous inquiries from parents/representative payees as to whether or not minors can purchase real or personal property such as real estate and motor vehicles. These inquiries have been generated by the payment of large retroactive benefit checks resulting from the review of some childhood disability cases. You asked us to address the following issues:
1. Does the State permit a minor to hold title to real property or personal property such as an automobile?
2. If so, are Sere any restrictions as to the age of the minor or the types of property that can be held?
3. Are there any specific requirements on how the property should/must be titled to show the minor as the titleholder?
4. If a State does not permit a minor to hold title to property, or does not permit the property to be titled/registered in the minor's name, what is the preferred method(s) of titling the property to reflect or protect the minor's interest in the property and satisfy SSA's regulatory requirements?
We are of the opinion that a minor may hold title to either real or personal property in the State of New Mexico, without restriction as to age of the minor or the type of property that may be held. Additionally, there are no specific requirements on how the property must be titled to show the minor as the titleholder.
The State of New Mexico provides very little statutory guidance in this matter, and no New Mexico case law directly addresses the issue of titling requirements for a minor. Property may be transferred to a minor under the New Mexico Uniform Transfers to Minors Act, (UTMA) enacted in 1989, which replaced the Uniform Gifts to Minors Act in effect prior to the enactment of the current statute. The UTMA specifies that any transfer made under the provisions of that Act is irrevocable, and creates custodial property which is indefeasibly vested in the minor. N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 46-720, 46-7-22 (West 1998). The New Mexico Uniform Probate Code defines "property" to include both real and personal property or any interest therein, and means anything that may be the subject of ownership. N.M. Stat. Ann. § 45-1-201 (West 1998). In light of this definition, and because the UTMA specifically permits the transfer of property to minors, which then becomes indefeasibly vested in the minor, we conclude that a minor can hold title to real and personal property in the State of New Mexico.
New Mexico statutes do not restrict the types of property that can be held by a minor. The statutory age of majority in New Mexico is 18 years, except that for the purposes of the UTMA, a minor is an individual who has not attained the age of 21 years. N.M. Stat. Ann. §§ 28-6-1, 46-7-12 (West 1998).
The only titling requirements for minor property holders are found in the UTMA, which requires that property transferred under that statute be kept separate and distinct from all other property in a manner sufficient to identify it clearly as custodial property of the minor. N.M. Stat. Ann. § 46-7-23 (West 1998). Custodial property subject to recordation or registration is so identified if it is either recorded or registered, or held in an account designated in the name of the custodian, followed in substance by the words: "as custodian for (name of minor) under the Uniform Transfers to Minors Act." Id. However, the UTMA governs titling requirements for gifts or transfers made to a minor, and the issues of this legal opinion concern the proper titling of property purchased with monies already in the possession of a child beneficiary in his or her dedicated account. A representative payee would not appear to be making a girl or other type of transfer covered by the UTMA when he or she makes a purchase of property with a minor's conserved funds. Thus, the UTMA would not apply to such purchases and would not impose any titling requirements on the minor's property.
The Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 requires that any past due benefit payments to individuals under age 18, such as the large retroactive benefit checks that are the subject of this legal opinion, must be paid into a separate dedicated account. Pub. Law 104-193. As codified by Social Security regulations, the representative payee for the beneficiary is required to establish an account in a financial institution dedic