Retention Date: 07/06/2025
Revision Statement: We are updating this emergency message (EM) to reflect SSR 24-3p.
Summary of Revisions:
- Added new guidance from SSR 24-3p requiring vocational explanation when a VE or VS uses information that is different from our regulatory terms and definitions.
- Removed references and outdated guidance based on SSR 00-4p, which has been archived.
- Edited the References section.
A. Purpose
This Emergency Message (EM) provides guidance for policy-compliant use of occupational information from Digital Library electronic tools.
B. Background
In making disability determinations and decisions, SSA takes administrative notice of reliable job information from various governmental and other publications, including the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) (including its companion publication, the Selected Characteristics of Occupations (SCO)). The SSA Digital Library hosts three searchable databases developed by SkillTRAN for the DOT. Adjudicators may use these tools to help make an assessment at step four (see 20 CFR 404.1560(b)(2) and 416.960(b)(2)) or step five (see 20 CFR 404.1566(d), 404.1568(d)(2), 416.966(d), and 416.968(d)(2)) of the sequential evaluation process.
C. Policy for considering information from occupational data tools
OccuBrowse, Job Browser Pro, and OASYS contain DOT and SCO occupational information developed by the United States Department of Labor (DOL). This information is useful, but it does not replace SSA policy or adjudicative judgment and decision-making. While the DOT and SCO are acceptable sources of occupational information for adjudicating disability claims, OccuBrowse, Job Browser Pro, and OAYSYS also contain (1) information that is different from our regulatory terms and definitions and (2) information of which we do not take administrative notice.
1. Information that is different from our regulatory terms and definitions:
Our rules (such as regulatory terms and definitions) and our guidance are controlling for adjudicators (SSR 24-3p). If a VE or VS cites a data source that defines exertion, skill, or education differently than how the agency defines those terms, the VE or VS, must acknowledge the difference and explain whether or how this difference has been accounted for in the evidence the VE or VS provided.
The following information is generally inconsistent with SSA’s terms:
Aptitudes and Work Situations (Temperaments). These ratings do not represent functional requirements for work because they reflect the personal interests, natural abilities, and personality characteristics of job incumbents rather than occupational requirements that adjudicators must consider when assessing the vocational impact of limitations or restrictions resulting from a medically determinable impairment(s), as is required for SSA’s disability programs.
Occupational Information Network (O*NET) Information: O*NET does not define physical exertion requirements in a way that is consistent with SSA regulations (20 CFR 404.1567 and 416.967). O*NET instead groups lifting with activities that SSA rules define as non-exertional (e.g., climbing, stooping, and handling). Accordingly, the information in O*NET is not generally usable in our adjudication process.
2. Information about which we do not take administrative notice:
Obtain VS or VE evidence before relying on any of the following content:
a. Labor Market information.
Federal agencies now publish labor market information by the Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) code. Those with vocational expertise use various approaches to arrive at informed estimates of numbers of jobs that exist within a DOT occupation. Results may differ given the method used for the estimate. We have not reviewed and do not specifically endorse the SkillTRAN proprietary algorithm.
b. Occupations that were not published in the 1991 DOT and SCO. Some SkillTRAN products include 21 additional occupations and two revised occupations (*last two in the chart below) developed by the DOL that were not published in the 1991 DOT. While a VS or VE could provide evidence that considers an occupation not published in the DOT, adjudicators must be careful not to take administrative notice of SkillTRAN content added after 1991 when the DOT was last updated. These non-DOT occupations are provided for reference in the following table:
Occupations DOL developed but did not publish |
Unpublished DOT Code | Title |
019.062-010 | Geographic Information System Specialist |
029.261-030 | Microscopist, Asbestos |
031.167-018 | Telecommunications Specialist |
076.224-018 | Movement Therapist |
078.367-014 | Specimen Processor |
079.262-014 | Medical Record Coder |
094.224-022 | Employment Training Specialist |
162.117-034 | Media Buyer |
164.117-022 | Media Planner |
169.117-018 | Provider Relations Representative |
169.117-022 | Meeting Planner |
186.117-090 | Compliance Officer |
195.107-050 | Bereavement Counselor |
195.167-046 | Health Services Coordinator |
195.167-050 | Case Manager |
211.367-014 | Automatic Teller Machine (ATM) Servicer |
319.557-010 | Mini Bar Attendant |
359.567-014 | Tanning Salon Attendant |
599.584-010 | Reuse Technician |
849.464-010 | Solar Film Installer (Automotive Svcs.) |
869.381-038 | Overhead Door Installer |
079.262-010 | Utilization-Review Coordinator* |
169.167-090 | Quality Assurance Coordinator* |
D. Questions
Direct all program-related and technical questions to your Regional Office (RO) support staff or Chief Administrative Law Judge.
OAO personnel should direct questions through their management chain. Managers may direct further questions to the Executive Director’s Office.
E. References
· 20 CFR 404.1560, 404.1566, 404.1568, 416.960, 416.966, and 416.968
· SSR 24-3p: Titles II and XVI: Use of Occupational Information and Vocational Specialist and Vocational Expert Evidence in Disability Determinations and Decisions
· SSR 82-41: Titles II and XVI: Work Skills and Their Transferability as Intended by the Expanded Vocational Factors Regulations Effective February 26, 1979
· DI 25003.001 Vocational Specialists
· DI 25025.030 Support for a Framework “Not Disabled” Determination
· HALLEX I-2-5-48 Vocational Experts – General
· HALLEX I-2-5-57 Obtaining Vocational Expert Testimony Through Interrogatories
· HALLEX I-2-6-74 Testimony of a Vocational Expert
· HALLEX I-2-8-20 Decision Writing Instructions
· HALLEX I-3-7-13 Remand for Vocational Evidence