GN 04440.015 Federal Quality Review of Certified Electronic Folder (CEF) Cases
In Section C., we:
Changed the capitalization of the word "Federal" to the lowercase "federal", as federal is only capitalized when used to refer to a proper noun.
Changed the third sentence in the second bullet from one sentence to two and made minor changes to the new second sentence to improve clarity.
Added the title of the POMS to the reference in the last sentence.
In Section D., we:
Changed the capitalization of the word "Federal" in the first sentence to the lowercase "federal", as federal is only capitalized when used to refer to a proper noun.
In Section D.1., we:
Added a comma after "PC7" in D.1.
In Section D.2., we:
Added a lead in sentence to better reflect what information was contained in this section.
Reworded both bullets to improve clarity.
Removed the obsolete POMS reference in the last sentence and replaced it with the updated POMS reference numbers and titles.
In Section D.3., we:
Changed "the review" to "a quality review" in the first sentence, as "the" refers to a specific review and "a" refers to reviews, in general.
Added parentheses around the POMS title in the second sentence to make the presentation of references consistent throughout this POMS.
In Section E., we:
Changed "redirected" to "directed", as "redirected" would not apply to both types of routing referenced in this section.
Removed the obsolete POMS reference (DI 81030.115) in the last sentence and changed the presentation of the remaining, still applicable, POMS to make it consistent with other POMS references in this section.
In Section G., we:
Added the word "guidance" after the word "the".
Removed the existing POMS reference and replaced it with a reference that provides information on both types of rebuttal processes an adjudicating component can use when they disagree with a deficiency cited by a review component.