Program Operations Manual System (POMS)
TN 10 (08-20)
RM 03803.013 Complete Case - Definition
-
A.
Consider the case to be “complete” if one of the following conditions exists:
-
1.
The alleged employment or self-employment is confirmed as not covered under the Social
Security Act, and:
-
a.
The individual did not question the coverage of his/her employment or self-employment,
or
-
b.
The earnings reported are in agreement with the amount alleged per the rules in “B” below.
-
2.
A report for the alleged employer is in process, and:
-
a.
It cannot be determined if the correct earnings should post, and
-
b.
The file does not include sufficient evidence to establish the alleged earnings, and
-
c.
There is no indication the NH was informed his/her record will be corrected later.
-
B.
Consider the reported earnings in agreement with the allegation if one of the following
conditions exists:
-
1.
The earnings reported are in exact agreement with the allegation.
-
2.
The earnings reported are not in exact agreement but the conditions cited in D. below
exist.
-
C.
Agreement does not exist if one or more of the following conditions are present:
-
1.
A QC is involved (the individual must have less than 40 QC's for it to be an issue).
-
2.
A report was not filed by the employer for the period alleged or part of it.
-
3.
Wages were not reported for the employee by the employer.
-
4.
The individual insists his/her earnings record be investigated.
-
5.
Evidence was submitted with the allegation.
-
D.
When “exact” agreement does not exist, reported earnings are deemed in agreement if one or more
of the following conditions apply:
-
1.
LAG PERIOD
The only earnings
not reported are in the lag period.
-
2.
MAXIMUM INVOLVED
The individual alleged earnings are the maximum earnings or over the maximum earnings
were posted, and the individual is seeking to add to the posting(s); or
NOTE 1: In wage cases, apply the maximum rule to each alleged employer separately.
NOTE 2: In SEI cases, consider that the maximum rule is met if both an amount of SEI and
wages are credited for the year alleged and the combined total equals the maximum.
-
3.
NO QC OR “NR PERIOD” IS INVOLVED
Evidence was submitted and the difference between the reported earnings and the evidence
is less than the amount required for a quarter of coverage for the period in question
while there is no positive indication in file of an incorrect reporting practice by
the employer.
-
4.
APPROXIMATE ALLEGATION OF SEI
The individual alleged an approximate amount of SEI and SEI is posted to the record
for the year of the allegation.
-
5.
COMBINING AG AND NON-AG WAGES
An annual amount of total agricultural wages, plus any quarterly amounts reported
by the same employer in the same year, are in exact agreement with the allegation.
This applies whether the reported wages are under the same or different EIN's.
-
6.
TIME LIMITATION EXPIRED
The time limitation of 3 years, 3 months, and 15 days elapsed for all of the years
in which SSA records do not agree with the allegation although the amount reported
disagrees with the amount alleged. The following exceptions are applicable:
-
a.
Wage cases involving years prior to 1978 are considered “incomplete” if,
-
•
Correction may be possible under one of the exceptions to the statute of limitations
(see RS 02201.020), and
-
•
The case includes either sufficient evidence to establish a reasonable probability
that the unreported wages were paid, or the information the employer consented to
furnish is primary evidence of wages. NOTE: For 1978 and later, consider the case incomplete if
correction may be possible under one of the exceptions
to the statute of limitations.
-
b.
If SEI is involved, consider the case “incomplete” if no SEI is reported and the individual states he/she filed the report within the
time limitation.
-
E.
Handle all complete cases meeting the applicable requirements in A - D above, as follows:
-
1.
Prepare a closeout letter.
-
2.
Close the case in the electronic control system.
-