TN 4 (09-25)
DI 39554.205 The Audit Process Under 2 CFR 200
Audits conducted under 2 CFR 200 will be made according to the General Accounting
Office, Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs,
Activities and Functions, the Guidelines for Financial and Compliance Audits of
Federally Assisted Programs, any compliance supplements approved by OMB, and generally accepted auditing standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. For State governments
that receive federal assistance 2 CFR 200 establishes audit requirements.
Audits are made on an organization-wide basis rather than on a program basis. State
governments must use their own procedures to arrange for independent audits. The State
will prescribe the scope of audits as long as the audits include, at a minimum, an
examination of the systems of internal control, systems established to insure compliance
with laws and regulations affecting the expenditure of Federal funds, financial transactions
and accounts, and financial statements and reports of recipient organizations.
Audits usually are made annually, but not less frequently than every two years.
A 2 CFR 200 audit report will include the following:
-
A.
Financial statements, including footnotes, of the recipient organization.
-
B.
The auditor's comments on the financial statements which should:
-
1.
identify the statements examined and the period covered;
-
2.
identify the various programs under which the organization received federal funds,
and the amount of the awards received;
-
3.
state that the audit was done in accordance with the established standards; and
-
4.
express an opinion as to whether the financial statements are fairly presented in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. If an unqualified opinion
cannot be expressed, state the nature of the qualification.
-
C.
The auditor's comments on compliance and internal control should:
-
1.
include comments on weaknesses in and noncompliance with the systems of internal control,
separately identifying material weaknesses;
-
2.
identify the nature and impact of any noted instances of noncompliance with those
provisions of Federal law or regulations that could have a material effect on the
financial statements and reports; and
-
3.
contain an expression of positive assurance with respect to compliance with requirements
for tested items, and negative assurance for untested items.
-
D.
Comments on the accuracy and completeness of financial reports and claims for advances
or reimbursement to Federal agencies.
-
E.
Comments on corrective actions taken or planned by the recipient.
Work papers and reports will be retained for a minimum of 3 years from the date of
the audit report unless the auditor is notified in writing by HHS or SSA of the need
to extend the retention period. The audit workpapers will be made available upon request
to HHS or its designees and the General Accounting Office or its designees.
-
F.
The final audit report will be issued directly to the State agency with concurrent
issuance to the SSA central offices and other interested Federal offices.
The information contained in the audit report, and the audit recommendations, represent
the findings and opinions of the auditors. However, the final determinations of the
steps to be taken with respect to the recommendations will be made by the Social Security
Administration.
If there are recommendations that involve the DDS, the State components and DDS administrators
will correspond only with the SSA National Disability Determinations (NDD) leadership
on any 2 CFR 200 audit recommendations that need action or resolution by the State.
The State must also provide their comments to the Regional Commissioner within 30
days of receipt of the audit report. The components must provide a statement regarding
concurrence or non-concurrence with each recommendation as well as the State or DDS
“plan” for resolution of the recommendation. NDD will make all necessary contacts with other
Federal agencies and act as liaison between the State, Federal agencies or independent
auditors. The State will take no corrective action regarding an audit recommendation
until so advised by NDD. The State will receive a written notice of the determination
regarding the audit and will be given its appeal rights.
Regarding the resolution of appeal items that are questioned and reported in an audit
report see 20 CFR 404.1627(b) and 416.1027(b).