Last Update: 4/20/2015 (Transmittal I-3-107)
HA 01310.003 Hearing Office Re-Activates
Case Before Request for Review Processed
Renumbered from HALLEX section I-3-1-3
In some cases, the claimant may request review from the Appeals
Council, but the hearing office re-activates the hearing level case
before Office of Appellate Operations (OAO) staff establishes the
request for review in the Appeals Review Processing System (ARPS).
This situation usually occurs when an administrative law judge (ALJ)
wants to amend his or her prior action in favor of the claimant
and the ALJ is unaware of the request for review.
Even though a hearing level case has already been re-activated
in the hearing level system, the Appeals Council must respond to
the request for review. However, because a hearing level case has
been re-activated, establishing a case in ARPS would require that
OAO convert an electronic claim(s) file to a paper claim(s) file.
To avoid this, OAO staff will not establish a case in ARPS when
responding to the request for review. Rather, OAO staff will prepare
correspondence that gives notice to the claimant and appointed representative
(if any) that the Appeals Council is not acting on the request for
review. The letter will explain the particular circumstances involved
in the case and clearly state that the Appeals Council is not acting
on the request for review because the ALJ is reconsidering his or
her prior action. OAO staff will ensure that a copy of the request for
review and the Appeals Council's correspondence are associated with
the claim(s) file.
If OAO staff notices that a hearing
office is regularly re-activating a case rather than following the
procedures outlined in Hearings, Appeals and Litigation Law manual HA 01240.011,
he or she will notify the branch chief. If appropriate, the branch chief
will ask the Executive Director's Office to provide feedback to
the hearing operation by sending an email to ^DCARO ARPS Support.