At step five of the sequential evaluation process, when the RFC is not based solely on
non-exertional limitations and restrictions (e.g., mental, visual, communicative, etc.), the exertional limitations and restrictions
are expressed in terms of the exertional levels of work: sedentary, light, medium,
heavy and very heavy work.
An RFC for a "full range" of work at any of these exertional levels reflects the ability
to perform all or "substantially all" of the unskilled occupations existing at that
level and, with some exceptions, at lower levels. However, the ability to perform
"substantially all" activities required in an exertional range of work does not mean
the individual can perform every function without exception.
Generally, if a limitation or restriction is:
-
•
Slight or does not involve an activity typically required in sedentary work, it will
have little to no impact on the unskilled sedentary occupational base.
-
•
More than slight and up to significant, or involves an activity typically required
in sedentary work, it could have a considerable impact on the unskilled sedentary
occupational base.
IMPORTANT: Neither the Act nor our regulations and rulings define terms such as "significant"
or "slight" in the context of the effect of limitations or restrictions on the unskilled
sedentary occupational base. The adjudicator must consider all relevant case facts,
use their judgement when evaluating the extent of the erosion to the unskilled sedentary
occupational base, and document these findings in the vocational analysis in the Disability
Case Processing System (DCPS).
For information on documenting the rationale, see DI 26510.001.