QUESTION
               You asked whether the claimant, who divorced the number holder in the Republic of
                  Haiti, is eligible for wife's insurance benefits as the wife or divorced wife of the
                  number holder.
               
               OPINION
               We believe a Social Security Administration (SSA) adjudicator could find the claimant
                  eligible for wife's insurance benefits as a divorced wife on the account of the number
                  holder.
               
               BACKGROUND
               Janet F~ (Claimant) and Jean E~, the number holder (NH), were married on December
                  11, 1965, in the Republic of Haiti. Claimant and NH produced two children during their
                  marriage. On October 20, 1977, Claimant became a naturalized citizen of the United
                  States. On September 21, 1979, Claimant obtained a divorce decree in Haiti. Claimant
                  personally appeared before a court in Haiti to obtain the divorce decree. Claimant
                  alleges NH filed an answer after receiving notification of the divorce proceedings
                  by mail. Claimant and NH were both residents of New York at the time of the alleged
                  divorce.
               
               Claimant married and divorced twice following her alleged divorce from NH. Neither
                  of these latter two marriages lasted longer than ten years. Claimant's most recent
                  divorce occurred on June 23, 1993. NH remarried on August 1, 1995, and remains a resident
                  of New York. Claimant and NH are both over the age of sixty-two. NH began receiving
                  retirement insurance benefits in August 2002. Claimant began receiving disability
                  insurance benefits in September 1997, and receives less than half the monthly benefit
                  amount received by NH.
               
               DISCUSSION
               To be eligible for wife's insurance benefits as either a wife or a divorced wife of
                  an insured individual entitled to retirement or disability insurance benefits, a claimant
                  must first show she (1) filed an application for wife's insurance benefits; (2) has
                  attained the age of sixty-two, and (3) is not entitled to retirement or disability
                  benefits or is entitled based on a primary insurance amount which is less than one-half
                  the primary insurance amount of the insured individual. See Social Security Act (Act) § 202(b)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 402(b)(1); 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.330,
                  404.331 (2008). Claimant filed an application for benefits, is over the age of sixty-two,
                  and receives disability benefits in an amount which is less than half the monthly
                  retirement benefits received by NH. However, the Act imposes additional eligibility
                  requirements before either a wife or a divorced wife can obtain wife's insurance benefits.
               
               1. Eligibility for Wife's Insurance Benefits as the Spouse of NH
               A claimant for wife's insurance benefits as the wife of an insured individual must
                  also show she is married to the insured individual as well as one of the following:
                  (1) the marriage lasted at least one year immediately preceding the day on which the
                  application was filed, (2) both the claimant and the insured individual are the natural
                  parents of a child, or (3) the claimant was entitled to Social Security benefits in
                  the month before she married the insured.  See Act § 202(b)(1); Act § 216(b)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 416(b)(1); 20 C.F.R. § 404.330. Although
                  Claimant and NH produced two children during their marriage, Claimant submitted documentation
                  indicating she obtained a divorce from NH in the Republic of Haiti on September 21,
                  1979. If the divorce was valid, Claimant cannot receive wife's insurance benefits
                  as NH's wife.
               
               A claimant is the wife of an insured individual if the courts of the state in which
                  such insured individual is domiciled would find the claimant and the insured individual
                  were validly married when the application was filed. See Act § 216(h)(1)(A)(i); 20 C.F.R. § 404.345 (2008). NH was domiciled in New York when
                  Claimant filed her application for wife's insurance benefits. The Office of the Regional
                  Chief Counsel in Region II (ORCC-II) analyzed the validity of the divorce decree submitted
                  by Claimant and concluded New York would most likely recognize the decree as valid.
                  The ORCC-II noted Claimant personally appeared before a court in Haiti to obtain the
                  divorce. Claimant also alleges NH filed an answer after receiving notification of
                  the divorce proceedings by mail._/1
               
               NH's consent to the divorce is further evidenced by the decision of both NH and Claimant
                  to remarry. The ORCC-II explained New York recognizes a presumption in favor of finding
                  an individual's most recent marriage valid._/2 Therefore, we believe a New York court
                  would accept the Haitian divorce decree and find NH and Claimant were not married
                  when the application for wife's insurance benefits was filed.
               
               Claimant could be deemed the wife of NH if a New York court would find Claimant eligible
                  to inherit from NH through intestate succession even after finding she was not legally
                  married to NH when the application was filed.  See § Act 216(h)(1)(A)(ii); 20 C.F.R. § 404.345. Claimant could also be deemed the wife
                  of NH if she entered into a purported marriage with NH which would have been valid
                  but for a legal impediment not known to Claimant at the time of the ceremony. See Act § 216(h)(1)(B)(i); 20 C.F.R. § 404.346(a) (2008). However, it is not necessary
                  to address these issues since, as explained below, Claimant is entitled to wife's
                  insurance benefits as the divorced wife of NH.
               
               2. Eligibility for Wife's Insurance Benefits as the Divorced Spouse of NH
               A claimant for wife's insurance benefits as a divorced wife of an insured individual
                  entitled to retirement or disability benefits must also show she is not married and
                  was married to the insured individual for at least ten years prior to their divorce.
                  See Act §§ 202(b)(1), 216(d)(1); 20 C.F.R. § 404.331. Claimant is not married and her
                  marriage to NH lasted more than ten years. A claimant can lose eligibility for wife's
                  insurance benefits as a divorced wife if she marries a person other than the insured
                  individual.  See Act § 202(b)(1)(H); 20 C.F.R. § 404.332(b)(3) (2008). However, a divorced wife can
                  be re-entitled to benefits if she was divorced from the number holder and married
                  another person but the later marriage terminated, provided she meets the other requirements
                  for entitlement.  See POMS RS 00202.046. Claimant's most recent divorce occurred on June 23, 1993. Although Claimant married
                  and divorced twice since her divorce from NH, she is eligible for wife's insurance
                  benefits on NH's account as a divorced wife because she is currently single.
               
               CONCLUSION
               An SSA adjudicator could find Claimant eligible for wife's insurance benefits as a
                  divorced wife on the account of NH.
               
               Mary A. S~
 Regional Chief Counsel
 By: _________
 Christopher G. H~
 Assistant Regional Counsel
               
               
 _/1 “Under New York law, a divorce granted by foreign country will be afforded comity
                  by the State of New York where the jurisdiction of the foreign tribunal was predicated
                  upon the consent of both parties and residency, rather than domicile, was established
                  by a statutory 'brief contact' through the appearance of one of the parties.” See Program Operations Manual System (POMS) PR 06210.035(A). “However, mail order divorces, where a husband and wife attempt to confer jurisdiction
                  upon a court of a foreign nation by executing powers of attorney to counsel residing
                  there, and forwarding such instruments by mail without ever visiting that nation,
                  are void.” Id.
               _/2 “This presumption operates to effectuate 'a particular public policy such as upholding
                  legitimacy, favoring the participation in the decedent's estate of one who lived with
                  him as his spouse, and preserving the validity of a marriage where no strong public
                  policy would be served by doing otherwise.” See POMS PR 05110.035, quoting Dolan v. Celebrezze, 381 F.2d 231, 237 (2nd Cir. 1967).