After a claimant files a request for hearing but before an
administrative law judge (ALJ) holds a hearing, an ALJ may, under
certain circumstances, remand a case to the Disability Determination
Services or other component that issued the determination. See 20 CFR 404.948(c) and 416.1448(c).
An ALJ may remand for a revised determination on his or her own
initiative, or at the request of a claimant.
An ALJ will only remand a case for a revised determination
if there is reason to believe the revised determination would be
fully favorable to the claimant. While the regulatory language is
quite broad, the ALJ will only consider this requirement met if
the ALJ is reasonably certain a revised fully favorable determination
will be issued on remand. For example, the ALJ may receive new and
material evidence that appears to change the outcome, or a change
in the law permits a favorable determination.
Despite the regulatory authority
to do so, the ALJ will only remand a case for a revised determination
if it is more likely than not that the receiving component can more
timely adjudicate the case (e.g., the average processing time at
the receiving component is significantly shorter than the time the
claimant will likely wait for a hearing).
The procedures to remand for a revised determination are separate
and distinct from procedures for prehearing case review by another
agency component. For prehearing case review procedures, see Hearings,
Appeals and Litigation Law manual HA 01250.010. Of most significance,
revised determination remands differ from prehearing case reviews
because:
•
A remand results in
an immediate dismissal of the request for hearing; and
•
If a claimant disagrees with the revised determination
after a remand, he or she must submit a new request for hearing.