A claimant must inform or submit to the
Social Security Administration (SSA) all evidence,
in its entirety, known to him or her that relates to
whether or not he or she is blind or disabled. See 20
CFR 404.1512 and 416.912.
If a claimant has appointed a representative, the
representative must help the claimant obtain any information
or evidence that the claimant must submit. See 20
CFR 404.1740(b)(1)-(2) and 416.1540(b)(1)-(2).
This duty applies at the Appeals Council (AC) if the evidence relates to
the period on or before the date of the administrative law judge (ALJ)
decision (or the claimant's date last insured, when applicable).
Evidence generally does
not include a representative's analysis of the claim or oral
or written communications between a claimant and his or her
representative that are subject to the attorney-client privilege
or that would be subject to the attorney-client privilege if
a non-attorney representative was an attorney. See 20
CFR 404.1513(b) and 416.913(b).
If a claimant informs the AC about additional
evidence, the AC will not obtain or consider additional
evidence as a basis to grant review unless the claimant meets
one of the good cause exceptions set forth at 20
CFR 404.970(b) and 416.1470(b).
If the AC finds that the claimant meets a good cause
exception, the AC will follow the procedures below and will
evaluate the additional evidence with the other evidence of
record to determine whether to grant review. See 20
CFR 404.935, 404.970,
416.1435,
and 416.1470.
When the AC evaluates a decision that
is not based on an application for benefits and involves title XVI
of the Social Security Act (e.g., age 18 redeterminations, continuing
disability reviews, terminations), the AC considers the evidence in the
hearing record and any additional evidence it believes is material to
an issue being considered.
When a claimant informs the AC about additional evidence and the AC
finds that the claimant meets a good cause exception or the AC evaluates
a decision that is not based on an application for benefits and involves
title XVI of the Social Security Act (e.g., age 18 redeterminations,
continuing disability reviews, terminations), AC staff will generally
attempt to develop the evidence only if the claimant clearly indicates
that the evidence relates to the period on or before the date of the
ALJ hearing decision.
When the AC finds that the claimant meets a good cause exception
or the AC evaluates a decision that is not based on an application
for benefits and involves title XVI of the Social Security Act (e.g.,
age 18 redeterminations, continuing disability reviews, terminations),
and the additional evidence is related to the period on or before the
date of the ALJ hearing decision, staff will make necessary attempts,
referenced in this section, to obtain the evidence. In many instances,
the AC must also proffer the evidence associated with the claim(s)
file to the claimant and appointed representative, if any. For detailed
instructions on when proffer is required at the AC level, see Hearings,
Appeals and Litigation Law (HALLEX) manual HA 01320.016.
A representative
may inform SSA about evidence that relates to whether
or not the claimant is blind or disabled. See 20
CFR 404.970(b) and 416.1470(b).
A representative also has an affirmative duty to act with
reasonable promptness to help obtain the information
or evidence that the claimant must submit under the
regulations and forward the information or evidence to
SSA for consideration as soon as practicable. See 20
CFR 404.1740(b)(1) and 416.1540(b)(1).
If a representative is believed to present a pattern of not acting with
reasonable promptness to help obtain and forward the evidence to SSA,
an administrative appeals judge will consider whether circumstances
warrant a referral to the Office of the General Counsel (OGC) as a
possible violation of our rules. See HALLEX HA 01110.050 for instructions on making
referrals to OGC.