When a case is properly before the AC and the conditions for
reopening exist, the AC has the authority to consider the issue
of reopening and revising. See generally HALLEX HA 01390.005.
A claimant may expressly request reopening or may submit information
that implies a request for reopening. See HALLEX HA 01390.010.
The AC may also consider reopening an otherwise final action
on its own initiative. For example, if the AC is unable to review
a protest case (see HALLEX HA 01360.020) using its own motion
authority under 20
CFR 404.969 and 416.1469,
it may consider whether the conditions for reopening a case exist
under 20
CFR 404.987 and 416.1487.
Additionally, the AC may consider reopening and revising a
prior favorable determination or decision when the AC reaches a
conclusion on a subsequent application that conflicts with or adversely
affects a claimant's entitlement, earnings record, insured status,
etc. For example, the AC may find that the claimant does not have
earnings from self-employment for deduction purposes, and that the
earnings are not earnings for entitlement purposes. In this event, the
AC must reopen and revise the prior award to disallow the claim
or to reduce the amount of monthly benefits, whichever is appropriate.
(For more information, see HALLEX HA 01195.000, Subsequent Applications.)
When the AC declines to reopen a prior determination or decision,
it is a threshold inquiry only, meaning the AC does not adjudicate
the merits of the prior claim.