| Section | | Latest Transmittal |
|---|
| HA 01540.001 | Morrison, Doe & Decker v. Secretary | TN I-5-401 06-07-1990 |
| HA 01540.001A | Modification of Morrison, Doe & Decker Settlement Agreement | TN I-5-401A 05-20-1992 |
| HA 01540.004 | Hyatt v. Apfel | |
| HA 01540.007 | Polaski, et al. v. Bowen | |
| HA 01540.008B | Smith, et al. v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.011 | Johnson, et.al., v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.013 | Stieberger v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.016A | Wilson, et al. v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.017 | Bailey, et al. v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.018 | Processing Pending Cases Under Samuels | |
| HA 01540.018A | Processing Retroactive Class Member Cases in Samuels | |
| HA 01540.018B | Implementation of the Regulations Governing the Standards for Consultative Examinations and Existing Medical Evidence and the Evaluation of Symptoms, Including Pain, in Tennessee Disability Cases | |
| HA 01540.018C | Processing of Samuels “Pipeline” Cases | |
| HA 01540.019 | Prue/Weathers, et al. v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.021 | McDonald, et al., v. Bowen | |
| HA 01540.021A | McDonald, et al., v. Bowen | |
| HA 01540.021B | McDonald et. al. v. Bowen | |
| HA 01540.021C | McDonald, et. al., v. Bowen | |
| HA 01540.023 | Avery, et al. v. Secretary of HHS | |
| HA 01540.024 | Luna, et al. v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.025 | Blankenship, et al., v. Secretary of Health and Human Services | |
| HA 01540.026 | Boyd, et al. v. Bowen | |
| HA 01540.027 | Ward, et al., v. Schweiker | |
| HA 01540.028 | Sullivan v. Zebley | |
| HA 01540.028A | OHA Zebley Readjudication Instructions | |
| HA 01540.029 | Begley, et al. v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.030 | Determining Disability for a Child Under Age 18 ≬ Title XVI | |
| HA 01540.030A | Processing Supplemental Security Income Childhood Disability Cases Based on Pub. L. 104-193 | |
| HA 01540.030B | Processing Supplemental Security Income Childhood Disability Redetermination and Age-18 Redetermination Cases Based on Pub. L. 104-193 | |
| HA 01540.030C | Processing Supplemental Security Income Childhood Disability Continuing Disability Review (CDR) Cases Based on Public Law (Pub. L.) 104-193 | |
| HA 01540.032 | LaBelle, et al. v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.033 | Implementation of the Gonzalez Acquiescence Ruling | |
| HA 01540.034 | Verla Turner v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.035 | Martel v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.036 | State of New York v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.037 | Boring v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.038 | Hill v. Sullivan | |
| HA 01540.039 | Askin v. Shalala | |
| HA 01540.041 | Rescission of the Schisler Ruling; Use of the “CE/MER” Regulations in the Second Circuit | |
| HA 01540.042 | Bozzi v. Shalala | |
| HA 01540.043 | Taylor v. Shalala | |
| HA 01540.044 | Rosetti v. Shalala | |
| HA 01540.045 | Cuffee v. Shalala | |
| HA 01540.046 | Jones v. Shalala | |
| HA 01540.047 | Medellin v. Shalala | |
| HA 01540.048 | Sharpe v. Sullivan and Martinez v. Bowen | |
| HA 01540.050 | Mason v. Shalala | |
| HA 01540.051 | Schoolcraft v. Shalala | |
| HA 01540.052 | Dixon v. Shalala | |
| HA 01540.053 | Day v. Chater | |
| HA 01540.054 | S.P. v. Chater | |
| HA 01540.055 | Adamson v. Chater | |
| HA 01540.056 | Bentley v. Chater | |
| HA 01540.057 | Kendrick v. Chater | |
| HA 01540.059 | Small v. Chater | |
| HA 01540.060 | Implementation of the Chavez Acquiescence Ruling (Ninth Circuit) | |
| HA 01540.061 | Goodnight v. Apfel | |
| HA 01540.064 | Ellender v. Schweiker | |
| HA 01540.066 | Implementation of the Albright Acquiescence Ruling (Fourth Circuit) | |
| HA 01540.067 | Grant v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration | |
| HA 01540.068 | Dut Ban Le v. Barnhart | |
| HA 01540.069 | Martinez v. Astrue | TN I-5-469 05-27-2011 |
| HA 01540.070 | Clark v. Astrue | |
| HA 01540.071 | Padro et al. v. Colvin | TN I-5-471 05-20-2014 |
| HA 01540.072 | Hart et al. v. Colvin | TN I-5-472 01-06-2017 |
| HA 01540.073 | Casey v. Berryhill | |
| HA 01540.074 | Implementation of the Hicks Acquiescence Ruling (Sixth Circuit) | TN I-5-474-1 11-04-2024 |
| HA 01540.075 | Implementation of the Earley Acquiescence Ruling (Sixth Circuit) | |