ISSUED: May 20, 1992
I.  Purpose
This Temporary Instruction (TI) provides guidance for implementing the 
October 22, 1991 order of the United States District Court for the Western 
District of Washington in the Morrison, Doe & Decker v. 
Sullivan class action, which involves multiple disability 
issues. Issues relevant to this order concern the evaluation of treating 
physician opinion and obtaining consultative examinations and medical 
evidence of record. 
Adjudicators throughout the country must be familiar with this TI because 
Morrison class members who now reside outside of 
Washington must have their cases processed in accordance with the court's 
order.
II.  Background
On April 4, 1989, the district court approved a stipulated settlement 
agreement that required, among other things, continued compliance with the 
amended preliminary injunction of June 16, 1983, continued compliance with 
the second preliminary injunction of August 20, 1984, and the 
implementation of a December 16, 1988 order for readjudication of certain 
first injunction cases with respect to the evaluation of treating 
physician opinion. The 1989 settlement agreement also included a provision 
wherein the Secretary reserved the right to seek modification of the 
agreement in the event of a change in controlling precedent, governing 
statute or applicable valid regulation.
On August 1, 1991, a change in the applicable valid regulation occurred 
when the Secretary published final regulations, “Standards for 
Consultative Examinations and Existing Medical Evidence.” These 
regulations also included guidance on the evaluation of treating physician 
opinion. Accordingly, the Secretary notified the court of his desire to 
substitute the new regulations for the relevant provisions of the amended 
first and second preliminary injunctions and the December 1988 order. 
After briefing by the parties, the court, on October 22, 1991, granted the 
Secretary's motion for modification. The court also stated that its order 
did not preclude any person from filing suit to challenge the validity of 
the new regulations or any actions taken thereunder.
III. Guiding Principles
Paragraph C of the amended first preliminary injunction, paragraph 2 of 
the second preliminary injunction and paragraph 2 of the readjudication 
order are no longer in effect.
Paragraph C of the amended first preliminary injunction enjoined the 
Secretary from failing to apply the standards enunciated in Day 
v. Weinberger, 552 F.2d 1154 (9th Cir. 1975) and 
Rhodes v. Schweiker, 660 F.2d 722 (9th Cir. 
1981).
Paragraph 2 of the second preliminary injunction required SSA to: 1) 
purchase consultative examinations from nontreating sources only after 
asking specific questions of the treating source in an effort to obtain 
supplemental information for adjudication prior to the purchase of a 
consultative examination; 2) purchase such examination only after making 
efforts to purchase a consultative examination from the treating source; 
and 3) document reasons for purchasing a consultative examination from a 
nontreating source.
Paragraph 2 of the readjudication order required the Secretary to 
distribute Appendix A of the court's order to all Disability Determination 
Service and SSA staff members responsible for adjudicating class member 
claims. Appendix A contained the district court's ruling on the standards 
to be applied in deciding claims involving the opinion(s) of one or more 
treating physicians who have examined the claimant.
The regulations published on August 1, 1991 must be applied in their 
entirety to all initial and continuing disability claims under titles II 
and/or XVI of Washington State residents. This includes 
Morrison class member which have been consolidated 
at the OHA level with pending subsequent claims.
The Secretary must continue to comply with the remaining provisions of the April 1989 settlement order.
IV.  Inquiries
Hearing office personnel should direct any questions to their Regional 
Office. Regional Office personnel should contact the Division of Field 
Practices and Procedures in the Office of the Chief Administrative Law 
Judge at (FTS) 305-0022.