FACTS
               M~ is mentally retarded and receives SSI benefits based on disability. He was born
                  in 1956. M~'s natural parents are unknown and he has been in foster care or an institution
                  since he was one month old. Beginning around 1967, C~ and M2~ became M~'s foster parents.
                  On December XX, 1985, when M~ was 29 years old, the Probate Court of the County of
                  Oakland, Michigan, entered an "Order Terminating Parental Rights and Order for Adoption
                  of the Adult Adoptee," (Order) stating that C~ and Mrs. M2~ became the parents of
                  M~. The Order states that "[t]he mental and physical condition of the Adoptee is such
                  as to make the Adoptee a proper subject for adoption" and that the consent to the
                  adoption was "genuine and given by the person(s) having legal authority to sign the
                  consent." M~, C~, and M2~ have resided in Michigan at all times. C~ stated that adoption
                  was suggested by M~'s State of Michigan social worker to help get health insurance
                  benefits for M~ from C~' employer's group health plan.
               
               In January 2001, C~ became entitled to and applied for Retirement Insurance Benefits.
                  On March XX, 2001, M~ applied for Disabled Child's Insurance Benefits. It is not contested
                  that M~ is unmarried and has always been disabled.
               
               DISCUSSION
               M~ is entitled to Title II child's benefits on C~' account so long as (1) he is C~'s
                  child; (2) he is dependent on C~; (3) he applies; (4) he is unmarried; and (5) as
                  an individual over the age of eighteen, he was under a disability that began prior
                  to age twenty-two. See 42 U.S.C. § 402(d)(1); 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.350-404.368. A "child" includes an individual's
                  legally adopted child. 42 U.S.C. § 416(e); 20 C.F.R. § 404.356. An adoption is legal
                  if it complies with the adoption laws of the State where it took place and at least
                  one party to the adoption was domiciled or residing in that State at the time of the
                  adoption. POMS GN 00306.135; see also 20 C.F.R. § 404.356.
               
               In Michigan, the entire subject of adoption is governed entirely by statute and proceedings
                  in probate court must strictly comply with the terms of the authorizing statute. Matter of Adams, 473 N.W.2d 712, 714 (Mich. Ct. App. 1991)(citing In re Milner's Estate, 36 N.W. 2d 914 (mich. 1949); In re L~, 128 N.W. 2d 475 (Mich. 1964)). Michigan's Adoption Code allows adults to be adopted
                  the same as minors. See Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§ 710.22 ("'Adoptee' means the individual who is to be adopted,
                  regardless of whether the individual is a child or an adult"), 710.24 (listing requirements
                  for petitions for adoption of "a child or an adult"), 710.60 (after entry of Order
                  of Adoption, there is no distinction between the rights of a natural child and the
                  rights of an adoptee; effect of adoption is no different for adult adoptees than minor
                  adoptees). The statutes give no exceptions that might disallow or discount the Order
                  of adoption in this case.
               
               We found only one exception to the legal recognition of adult adoptees. Michigan courts
                  have held that, where the term "child" was used in a will, that term should be construed
                  to include an adopted adult child, unless there was an abuse of the adoption process
                  in order to obtain benefits under the will. Thurston v. Thurston, 363 N.W.2d 298, 300 (Mich. Ct. App. 1985) and In re Nowels Estate, 339 N.W.2d 861 (Mich. Ct. App. 1983). But see Mich. Comp. Laws Anno. § 700.2707 (April 2000)(clarifying circumstances under which
                  and adopted person may inherit, by virtue of the adoptive relationship, from someone
                  other than the adoptive parent). These cases, however, do not apply to the question
                  of whether M~ can qualify for child's insurance benefits, since the court's holdings
                  are limited to the context of donative transfers and since it is clear that the primary
                  purpose of M~'s adoption was to ensure health care benefits for M~ rather than to
                  allow M~ to take property under a will.
               
               We have been unable to discover any past or current Michigan law that requires "intentions
                  of filing" for adoption prior to age 18 (as mentioned in the documentation of the
                  initial denial) to validate an adult adoption.
               
               CONCLUSION
               Michigan's law liberally allows adoption of adults. The effect of an adoption in Michigan
                  is the same whether the adoption took place when the adoptee was a minor or an adult.
                  M~ should be considered a child of C~ and M2~ and, so long as other requirements are
                  met, granted Child's Insurance Benefits as the disabled child or C~.
               
                
               Thomas W. C~
Regional Chief Counsel
               
               By:_______________________
Malinda H~
Assistant Regional Counsel