When a claimant appeals a final administrative decision to the federal court, the
claimant may submit a new (subsequent) initial application at the FO, including a
new application for the same title and benefit, while the prior case is pending with
the court. The claimant must submit a new Form SSA-1696 for each representative appointed
on the subsequent application, even when the representative(s) handling the subsequent
application is the same person representing the claimant in court, or the same person
who represented the claimant before us in the prior claim.
If a claimant who has filed a subsequent application submitted a new Form SSA-1696
for that application and the court remands the previous case back to us, the AC will
consolidate the court remanded claim with the subsequent application if the claims
have a common issue. All valid appointment(s) in either case will remain in effect
for the consolidated claims. This means that both representatives appointed on the
initial claim and representatives appointed on the subsequent claim remain appointed
for the consolidated claims. We will follow the policy on multiple representatives
in GN 03910.040C above to process the consolidated claims. For the events that end a representative’s
appointment on either claim, see GN 03910.060.
NOTE: To receive authorization for administrative fees all representatives must sign the
same fee agreement form, or they must each file a separate fee petition. The court
may authorize 406(b) fees, which has no effect on our authorization of administrative
fees.
Example: A claimant filed for Title II disability benefits and has appealed our unfavorable
decision to Federal court. The attorney who represented the claimant before us, continues
to represent the claimant in Federal court. While the case is with the court, the
claimant files a subsequent application for Title II disability and appoints a non-attorney
as the representative. The non-attorney submits a valid Form SSA-1696 and fee agreement.
The court issues an order remanding the original case back to us. On remand, the AC
evaluates the cases and consolidates them because they both share a common issue and
have an overlapping alleged period of disability. In this consolidated case, the claimant
now has two representatives (if the representative for the court appeal does not withdraw
on remand) because no terminating events occurred for either representative. As such,
the claimant will need to choose a principal representative, and, to have fees authorized
for services performed before us, unless one of the representatives waives their fee, the
representatives will need to either sign and timely submit a joint fee agreement or
file separate fee petitions. For the policy on multiple representatives, see GN 03910.040C.