This subchapter discusses SSA federal quality reviews and provides instructions to Quality Review (QR) review components for conducting quality reviews of disability determinations, returning or correcting deficient cases, and for processing deficiencies rebutted by the adjudicating components. QR conducts federal quality reviews of disability cases in review components located nationwide.

The mandated quality reviews are:

• quality assurance reviews and

• pre-effectuation reviews.

For a detailed explanation of quality review types and the reasons QR performs them, see QR 04440.005.

QR reviews sample cases to ensure the evidentiary record supports the determination and that the evidence and the determination conform to SSA operating policies and procedures (see QR 04440.007 for additional information). The cases selected are representative of the universe of cases the adjudicating components review each year. The review results are extrapolated to all cases adjudicated in each case or sample type.

Federal quality reviews are virtual. Any QR review component may review any case without regard to the adjudicating component's location. QR only reviews cases with certified electronic folders (CEF).

An automated selection process selects quality review sample cases, when adjudicating components input determinations, and sends cases to review components prior to effectuation of the determinations.

Quality reviewers review adjudicating components' determinations using the same policy and procedural guidelines adjudicating components use. Quality reviewers follow the steps of sequential evaluation and consider all available evidence when assessing policy compliance, sufficiency of evidence, and determination accuracy.

Quality reviewers record review results, including any medical reviews, directly to QR’s case processing system. The case processing system transmits review data to QR in Central Office, where the data are stored and used to produce national reports and to provide reports to the Commissioner of the SSA, Congress, and other agency components, as requested.

If a case contains no returnable deficiency and is otherwise correct, the review component inputs the case information into the QR case processing system and effectuates the determination.

If a case is deficient, the quality reviewer makes the necessary correction(s) or returns the case to the adjudicating component for correction, based on the criteria listed below in section D.

If an adjudicating component disagrees with a deficiency return, they can submit an Informal Resolution Request (IRR) (see QR 04440.401) and/or file a Request for Program Consultation (RPC) (see DI 30007.125).

If a quality reviewer completes a quality review and concludes a claim was completed in accordance with SSA policy, and is supported by a preponderance of the evidence in file, the case is considered "clean." When a case is clean, that is, it contains no deficiency that requires correction, the QR reviewer codes the QR case processing system and clears the CEF case to the field office, program service center, National Records Center, or PC7 for effectuation of the determination.

QR may return a deficient case to an adjudicating component when correcting the deficiency could affect the disability determination, the period of disability, or conformance to certain technical requirements. Specific types of deficiencies, and how to correct them, are found in QR 04440.202 through QR 04440.204. Types of technical corrective actions (TCA), and how to correct them, are found in QR 04440.231 and QR 04440.232.

When a review component cites a group I or group II deficiency on a case, the adjudicating component may submit an IRR and/or RPC if the adjudicating component does not agree with the deficiency. Rebuttal procedures are described in QR 04440.401. RPC procedures are described in DI 30007.105 through DI 30007.155.