ISSUED: February 14, 1995; REVISED: June 28, 1996
I. Purpose
This Temporary Instruction (TI) sets forth procedures for implementing the 
parties' joint Stipulation and Order, approved by the United States 
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on July 7, 1994, 
and entered on July 8, 1994, in the Rosetti v. 
Shalala class action involving the standard for the evaluation 
of disability due to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or acquired 
immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
Adjudicators throughout the country must be familiar with this TI because 
of case transfers and because Rosetti class members 
who now reside outside of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and the 
Virgin Islands must have their cases processed in accordance with the 
requirements of the joint stipulation and order.
II. Background
On May 28, 1991, plaintiffs filed a class complaint challenging certain 
aspects of the Secretary's evaluation of claims of disability under titles 
II and/or XVI of the Social Security Act due to HIV or AIDS.
On December 17, 1991, the Secretary published 
Social Security Ruling (SSR) 
91-8p in order to revise and update the guidelines for the 
evaluation of claims for disability based on allegations of HIV or 
AIDS.
By orders dated March 31, 1992, and September 2, 1992, the United States 
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed the 
action.
On July 2, 1993, the Secretary published a final rule in the 
Federal Register establishing new listing 
sections called “Immune System” (Listings 14.00 and 114.00). 
The new listings included criteria for HIV (Listings 14.08 and 114.08). 
These criteria replaced SSR 
91-8p, which was rescinded as of the date of the publication of the 
new regulations.
On December 15, 1993, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third 
Circuit vacated the district court's dismissal orders and remanded the 
case to the district court for consideration of plaintiffs' motion for 
class certification. On March 9, 1994, the Court of Appeals denied the 
Secretary's petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing 
en banc.
In order to avoid further litigation, the parties agreed to settle their 
dispute. On July 7, 1994, the district court approved the parties' joint 
Stipulation and Order (Attachment 1). The clerk of the court entered the 
Stipulation and Order on July 8, 1994.
III. Guiding Principles
Under Rosetti, the Secretary will readjudicate the 
title II and title XVI claims of those persons who: 1) respond to notice 
informing them of the opportunity for review or who do not receive notice 
but who otherwise self-identify and request review (e.g., 
“walk-ins”); and 2) are determined, after screening, to be 
class members entitled to relief (see 
Parts IV. and V.). The class action 
section in the Office of Disability and International Operations (ODIO) 
will screen title II and concurrent title II and title XVI claims for 
eligibility for class relief, and the Northeastern Program Service Center 
(NEPSC) or the Mid-Atlantic Program Service Center (MATPSC) will screen 
title XVI only claims, unless there is a current claim, i.e., a potential 
class member claim or a subsequent claim, pending in the DDS or OHA, or 
stored at OHA. Regardless of the state of the claimant's current 
residence, the Disability Determination Services (DDSs) in Delaware, New 
Jersey, Pennsylvania and the Virgin Islands will, in most cases, perform 
the agreed-upon readjudications, irrespective of the administrative level 
at which the claim was last decided.
The DDS servicing the claimant's current address will perform the 
readjudication in terminal illness (TERI) cases and if a face-to-face 
review is necessary, i.e., cessation case.
 OHA will screen cases and perform readjudications under limited 
circumstances (see Part V.B.).
Cases readjudicated by the DDS will be processed at the reconsideration 
level regardless of the final level at which the claim was previously 
decided. The type of readjudication will be a 
"redetermination" (see 
Part VI.). Class members who receive 
adverse readjudication determinations will have full appeal rights (i.e., 
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing, Appeals Council and judicial 
review).
Adjudicators will use the disability evaluation standards reflected in 
Listings 14.08 and 114.08 in evaluating the disability claims of 
Rosetti class members.
Rosetti class member claims should be processed as 
expeditiously as possible. (See HALLEX 
HA 01210.040 and 
HA 01310.005 for TERI 
procedures.)
 IV. Definition of Class
Except as noted below, for purposes of implementing the terms of the 
stipulation and order, the Rosetti class 
potentially entitled to relief consists of all individuals who:
- • - filed for disability benefits under titles II and/or XVI of the Social 
Security Act based in whole or in part on allegations of HIV infection or 
AIDS; and 
- • - were issued a less than fully favorable (i.e., later onset, closed period, 
denied or terminated) final administrative determination or decision, 
based on medical reasons, between March 22, 1991, and July 1, 1993, 
inclusive, while residing in Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania or the 
Virgin Islands. - 
- A person is not a class member eligible for class relief if - (1) the last administrative denial or termination received on the 
potential Rosetti claim was issued before March 22, 
1991, or on or after July 2, 1993; or - (2) the individual received a final judicial decision on the potential 
Rosetti claim; or - (3) the individual had a subsequent claim denied on or after July 2, 1993, 
and the subsequent claim covered the entire period of disability at issue 
in the potential Rosetti claim. 
 
V. Determination of Class Membership and Eligibility for Relief and 
Preadjudication Actions
A. Pre-Screening Actions - General
- 1.  - Notification - Within 45 days after SSA issues implementation instructions, SSA shall, to 
the extent practicable, send an individual notice to the last known 
address of every individual who has been identified by computer run as a 
potential class member whose primary or secondary diagnosis code 
identified on SSA's data processing system was 0420 (AIDS), 0430 (HIV 
symptomatic) or 0440 (HIV asymptomatic). Individuals will have 60 days 
from the date of receipt of the notice to request that SSA readjudicate 
their claims under the terms of the Rosetti 
stipulation and order. SSA will presume an individual's receipt of the 
notice five days after mailing, unless the individual establishes that 
receipt actually occurred later. - ODIO will contact the servicing Social Security field office (FO) (i.e., 
district or branch office) for development of possible evidence of good 
cause for the untimely response. Good cause determinations will be based 
on the standards in 20 
CFR §§ 404.911 and 
416.1411. If good 
cause is established, the field office will forward the good cause 
determination and any folders currently in the FO, to ODIO (title II 
claims and concurrent claims) or the NEPSC or MATPSC (title XVI claims) to 
retrieve the folders and for screening. 
- 2.  - Alert and Folder Retrieval Process - All response forms should be returned to ODIO so that the information can 
be entered into the Civil Actions Tracking System (CATS). CATS will 
generate alerts to ODIO. See Attachment 2 for a sample 
Rosetti alert. - ODIO will associate the computer-generated alerts with available title II 
and concurrent title II and title XVI potential class member claim file(s) 
and conduct the screening. For title XVI only claims, the NEPSC or MATPSC 
will retrieve available folders, except those found in the Wilkes-Barre 
Data Operations Center (Wilkes-Barre), the DDS or OHA, and conduct the 
screening. Wilkes-Barre, NEPSC or MATPSC will retrieve available title XVI 
claim files and then forward those files to either the NEPSC or MATPSC for 
screening (see Part III.). 
- 3.  - Alerts Sent to OHA - If ODIO, the NEPSC, MATPSC or Wilkes-Barre determines that a current 
claim, i.e., either a potential class member claim or a subsequent claim, 
is pending appeal or stored at OHA, it will forward the alert to OHA, 
along with any prior claim file(s) not in OHA's possession, for screening, 
consolidation consideration and readjudication (if consolidated). - ODIO, the NEPSC, MATPSC or Wilkes Barre will forward all alerts 
potentially within OHA jurisdiction and related prior claim files, if any, 
to the Office of Appellate Operations (OAO), at the following address 
(case locator code 5007): Office of Hearings and Appeals
 Office of Appellate
Operations
 One Skyline Tower, Suite 701
 5107 Leesburg
Pike
 Falls Church, VA 22041-3200
 ATTN: OAO Class Action Coordinator- 
- The OAO Class Action Coordinator is responsible for controlling and 
reconciling the disposition of class alerts shipped to OHA Headquarters 
for association with pending or stored claims. The Coordinator will 
maintain a record of all alerts received and the location, if any, to 
which they are transferred. This information will be necessary to do the 
final class membership reconciliation. 
 
- 4.  - Folder Reconstruction - In general, ODIO, the NEPSC or MATPSC will coordinate any necessary 
reconstruction of prior claim files. OHA requests for reconstruction of 
potential Rosetti cases should be rare. Prior to 
requesting reconstruction, OHA will determine whether available systems 
data or other information provides satisfactory proof that the claim would 
not confer class membership. OHA (the HO or the OAO branch) will direct 
any necessary reconstruction requests to the servicing FO. The request 
will be made by memorandum and will include the alert and any accompanying 
claim file(s) (if the claim file(s) is not needed for adjudication 
purposes) as attachments. The request will also include documentation of 
the attempts to locate the file. The memorandum will request the FO to 
send the reconstructed file to OHA after it completes its reconstruction 
action. HOs will route any reconstruction requests directly to the 
servicing FO. The OAO branch will route reconstruction requests through 
the OAO Class Action Coordinator. For CATS purposes, HO personnel and the 
OAO Class Action Coordinator will forward a copy of the reconstruction 
request memorandum to Litigation Staff at the following address: Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Programs,
 Policy,
Evaluation and Communications
 Litigation Staff
 3-K-26
Operations Building
 6401 Security Boulevard
 Baltimore,
MD 21235
 ATTN: RosettiCoordinator- HO personnel and the OAO branch will identify in the reconstruction 
request the OHA location of any existing claim file(s) being retained for 
adjudication purposes, and the date(s) of the claim(s) involved. - The HO or OAO will not delay action on a pending claim when a prior claim 
is being reconstructed for screening purposes, unless the prior claim is 
needed for the adjudication of the pending claim. If OHA completes action 
on the pending claim prior to receipt of the reconstructed folder, the HO 
or OAO, as appropriate, will forward the class action material, including 
the alert, unneeded claim files, if any, and the reconstruction request to 
the OAO Class Action Coordinator, along with a copy of the action on the 
pending claim. For additional information on reconstruction procedures, 
see the Class Action Implementation instructions in 
HALLEX 
HA 01170.005 C. 
- 5.  - Class Membership Denials (Non-Eligibility for Relief) - ODIO, the NEPSC or MATPSC, or OHA, as appropriate, will hold for 90 days 
all claim files of individuals to whom SSA sends notice of non-class 
membership and ineligibility for relief, pending review by claimants or 
class counsel. If an individual wishes to dispute SSA's class 
membership/eligibility for relief determination, he or she must give 
timely written notice of the disagreement to the Office of the General 
Counsel (OGC) (i.e., within 60 days of receipt of notice that the 
individual is not a class member eligible for relief). Upon request, class 
counsel, subject to the Privacy Act Protective Order, will be given 
reasonable and timely access to potential class members' claim files for 
the purpose of resolving class membership disputes. Upon request by class 
counsel to review claim files, the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for 
Programs' Litigation Staff will coordinate with ODIO, the NEPSC or MATPSC, 
or OHA to forward the claim files to: MATPSC
 300 Spring Garden Street
 Philadelphia,
PA 19123
- 1.  - Determining Jurisdiction for Screening - a.  - Current Claim in OHA - As provided in Part V.A.3., if there is a 
current claim pending or stored at OHA Headquarters, the OAO Class Action 
Coordinator will receive the alert and related 
Rosetti claim file(s). The OAO Class Action 
Coordinator will determine OHA jurisdiction for screening and forward as 
follows. - • - If the current claim is in an HO, the Coordinator will forward the alert 
and any prior claim file(s) to the HO for screening using Attachment 3. 
(Part V.B.2.a. provides instructions to 
HOs regarding the action to be taken if they receive an alert package but 
no longer have a current claim pending.) 
- • - If the current claim is before the Appeals Council, or is located in an 
OAO branch mini-docket or in an OAO Docket and Files Branch (DFB), the 
Coordinator will forward the alert and any prior claim file(s) to the 
appropriate OAO branch for screening using Attachment 3. 
(Part V.B.2.a. provides instructions to 
the OAO branches regarding the action to be taken if they receive an alert 
package but no longer have a current claim pending.) - If the Coordinator (or designee) is unable to locate the current claim 
file within OHA, the Coordinator (or designee) will broaden the claim file 
search and arrange for alert transfer or folder reconstruction, as 
necessary. 
 
- b.  - Current Claim Pending in Court - If the OAO Class Action Coordinator receives an alert for a claimant who 
has a civil action pending, either on the alerted case or on a subsequent 
or prior claim, the Coordinator will forward the alert and any 
accompanying claim file(s) to the appropriate OAO Court Case Preparation 
and Review Branch (CCPRB) for screening using Attachment 3. See 
Part V.B.2.b. for special screening 
instructions when a civil action is involved. 
 
- 2.  - Screening - a.  - General Instructions - The screening component will associate the alert and any prior claim 
file(s) with the claim file(s) in its possession and complete a screening 
sheet (see Attachment 4) as follows: - 
- If the claim pending at OHA is the potential class member claim, then the 
individual is not a class member entitled to relief under 
Rosetti (see 
Part IV.). Complete the screening sheet 
and follow the instructions in 
Part V.B.3.a. for processing the claims 
of individuals who are not class members eligible for relief. 
 
- • - Consider all applications denied/ceased during the 
Rosetti timeframe; - 
- Although not the “final decision of the Commissioner,” an 
Appeals Council denial of a request for review is the last action of the 
Commissioner, and the date of such denial controls for class membership 
screening purposes. 
 
- • - Follow all instructions on the screening sheet; 
- • - Sign and date the original screening sheet, place it in the claim file (on 
the top right side of the file); and 
- • - If the screening component is an OHA headquarters component, forward a 
copy of the screening sheet to the OAO Class Action Coordinator at the 
address in Part V.A.3. (The Coordinator 
will enter information from the screening sheet into a database and will 
forward a copy of the screening sheet to the Division of Litigation 
Analysis and Implementation (DLAI).) If the screening component is an HO, 
forward a copy of the screening sheet directly to DLAI at the following 
address: Office of Hearings and Appeals
 Division of Litigation
Analysis and
 Implementation
 One
Skyline Tower, Suite 702
 5107 Leesburg Pike
 Falls
Church, VA 22041-3255- HO personnel may also forward material by telefax to DLAI at (703) 
305-0655. (DLAI will retain a copy of each screening sheet and forward a 
copy to Litigation Staff.) - If the HO receives an alert only or an alert associated with a prior claim 
file(s) for screening, and no longer has the current claim file, it will 
return or forward the alert and any prior claim file(s) to the OAO Class 
Action Coordinator (see address in 
Part V.A.3.), and advise the Coordinator 
of the action taken on the current claim and its destination. The 
Coordinator will determine the claim file location and, if it is located 
in OHA headquarters, will forward the alert and any accompanying prior 
claim file(s) to the responsible OAO branch for screening, using 
Attachment 3. If the file(s) is no longer in OHA, the Coordinator will use 
Attachment 5 to send the alert and any accompanying prior claim file(s) to 
the non-OHA location. - If an OAO branch receives an alert only, or an alert associated with a 
prior claim file(s) and no longer has the current claim file (and it is 
not located in mini-dockets or an OAO DFB), it will determine the location 
of the current claim file. If the current claim file is located within 
OHA, the OAO branch will use Attachment 3 to forward the material to the 
OHA location. If the file(s) is no longer in OHA, the OAO branch will use 
Attachment 5 to forward the material to the non-OHA location. The OAO 
branch will also advise the OAO Class Action Coordinator of its 
actions. - 
- Final determinations or decisions made on or after July 2, 1993, on a 
subsequent claim filed by a potential Rosetti class 
member may have adjudicated the entire timeframe covered by the 
Rosetti claim. Instead of applying the doctrine of 
administrative res judicata to the Rosetti claim, a 
non-class membership/ineligibility for relief determination must be 
made. 
 
 
- b.  - Special OAO Screening Instructions if a Civil Action Is Involved - As noted in Part V.B.1.b., the CCPRB will 
screen for Rosetti class membership/eligibility for 
relief when a civil action is involved. The CCPRB's class 
membership/eligibility for relief determination will dictate the 
appropriate post-screening action. - • - If the claim pending in court is the potential class member claim, the 
CCPRB will immediately notify OGC so that OGC can notify the claimant of 
the option to have the case remanded for readjudication under 
Rosetti. 
- • - If the claim pending in court is a subsequent claim and was adjudicated in 
accordance with the disability evaluation standards reflected in Listings 
14.08 and 114.08 and resolved all Rosetti issues, 
the claimant is not a Rosetti class member entitled 
to relief. The CCPRB will follow the instructions in 
Part V.B.3.a. for processing such 
claims. 
- • - If the claim pending in court was adjudicated in accordance with Listings 
14.08 and 114.08, but did not resolve all Rosetti 
issues, e.g., there is a prior (inactive) claim and the current claim did 
not adjudicate the entire period covered by the 
Rosetti claim, the CCPRB will forward the 
Rosetti claim to the appropriate DDS for separate 
review. The CCPRB will modify the case flag in Attachment 13 to indicate 
that the pending court case does not resolve all 
Rosetti issues and that the 
Rosetti class member claim is being forwarded for 
separate processing. The CCPRB will notify the Class Action Coordinator of 
its action. 
- • - If the final administrative decision on the claim pending in court was not 
adjudicated in accordance with the disability evaluation standards 
reflected in Listings 14.08 and 114.08, or is legally insufficient for 
other reasons, the CCPRB will initiate voluntary remand proceedings and 
consolidate the claims. 
 
 
- 3.  - Post-Screening Actions - a.  - Screened Out Cases - If the screening component determines that the individual is not a class 
member eligible for relief, the component will: - • - notify the individual and representative, if any, (with a copy to class 
counsel) of that determination using Attachment 6 (modified as necessary 
to fit the circumstances and posture of the case when there is a current 
claim); - 
- Include the date and claim number at the top of Attachment 6 in the spaces 
indicated. 
 
- • - retain a copy of the notice in the claim file; 
- • - send a copy of the notice to Rosetti class 
counsel: Community Legal Services, Inc.
 1424 Chestnut Street
 Philadelphia,
PA 19102- An individual who wishes to dispute a determination of non-class 
membership and ineligibility for relief may do so directly, through their 
representative of record, or through Rosetti class 
counsel. 
- • - retain the claim file(s) for 90 days pending a possible class membership 
dispute; 
- • - if class counsel makes a timely request to review a screened out claim 
file, send the file to: MATPSC
 300 Spring Garden Street
 Philadelphia,
PA 19123- using the pre-addressed route slip in Attachment 7; - 
- Photocopy any material contained in the prior file that is relevant to the 
current claim and place it in the current claim file before shipping the 
prior file. 
 
- • - if SSA, through OGC, resolves the dispute in the claimant's favor: 1) the 
original screening component or Litigation Staff will prepare a revised 
screening sheet and send notice of the revised class 
membership/eligibility for relief determination (Attachment 8) to the 
claimant, or representative, if any, and class counsel; 2) OHA 
jurisdiction cases will proceed in accordance with 
Part VI.; 3) the rescreening component 
will notify DLAI of the revised determination by forwarding a copy of the 
revised screening sheet to DLAI; and 4) DLAI will coordinate with the OAO 
Class Action Coordinator as necessary. 
- • - if the dispute cannot be resolved, OGC will send the claimant, and class 
counsel, a notice indicating that the claimant will have 60 days to 
request district court review of the class membership/eligibility for 
relief determination. 
- • - if after 90 days no review is requested, return the file(s) to the 
appropriate storage location if not otherwise needed. 
 
- b.  - Cases Determined to Be Class Members Entitled to Relief - If the screening component determines that the individual is a class 
member entitled to relief, it will proceed with processing and 
adjudication in accordance with the instructions in 
Part VI.  
 
VI. Processing and Adjudication
A. Cases Reviewed by the DDS
The Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Virgin Islands DDSs, or any 
other DDSs servicing residents of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania or 
the Virgin Islands, will usually conduct the first 
Rosetti review. An exception may apply when the 
Rosetti claim is a TERI case. An exception will 
also apply for cases consolidated at the OHA level (see 
Part VI.E.). The DDS determination will 
be a reconsideration determination, regardless of the administrative level 
at which the class member claim(s) was previously decided, with full 
appeal rights (i.e., ALJ hearing, Appeals Council and judicial review). 
(See Part VI.B.)
 B. OHA Adjudication of Class Member Claims
The following instructions apply to both consolidation cases in which the 
ALJ or Appeals Council conducts the Rosetti 
readjudication and to DDS readjudication cases in which the claimant 
requests a hearing or Appeals Council review. Except as noted herein, HOs 
and OHA Headquarters will process Rosetti class 
member cases according to all other current practices and procedures 
including coding, developing evidence, routing, etc. However, pursuant to 
the parties' stipulation and order, SSA must exert its best efforts to 
resolve all Rosetti class members' claims as 
expeditiously as possible.
Implementation of the Rosetti order must never 
delay the processing of TERI claims and must never interfere with the 
operation of TERI procedures on such claims. (See 
HALLEX 
HA 01210.040 and 
HA 01310.005.)
 - 1.  - Type of Review and Period to Be Considered - a.  - Pursuant to the Rosetti Stipulation and Order, 
regardless of whether the claim under review is an initial claim or a 
cessation case, the type of review to be conducted is a 
redetermination. The redetermination 
shall be a de 
novo evaluation of the class 
member's eligibility for benefits based on all evidence in his or her file 
including newly obtained evidence relevant to the period that was at issue 
in the administrative determination or decision(s) that forms the basis 
for Rosetti class membership. 
- b.  - If the redetermination results in a favorable decision, the adjudicator 
will determine whether the individual's disability has been continuous 
through the date of the redetermination or to the date of the most recent 
allowance. 
- c.  - If the evidence establishes that disability began only at some point after 
the administrative determination(s)/decision(s) that forms the basis for 
Rosetti class membership, the class member must 
file a new application to establish eligibility. 
 
- 2.  - Disability Evaluation Standards - Adjudicators must use the disability evaluation standards reflected in 
Listings 14.08 and 114.08 for evaluating disability based on allegations 
of HIV or AIDS in class member claims. 
- 3.  - Class Member Is Deceased - If a class member is deceased, the usual survivor and substitute party 
provisions and existing procedures for determining distribution of any 
potential underpayment apply. 
 C. Claim at OHA But No Current Action Pending
If a claim file (either a class member or a subsequent claim) is located 
in OHA Headquarters but there is no claim actively pending administrative 
review, i.e., Headquarters is holding the file awaiting potential receipt 
of a request for review or notification that a civil action has been 
filed, OAO will associate the alert with the file and screen for class 
membership. (The OAO Class Action Coordinator will coordinate the 
necessary actions as explained in 
Part V.) (See 
Part V.B.3., for non-class member 
processing instructions.)
- • - If the 120-day retention period for holding a claim file after an ALJ 
decision or Appeals Council action has expired, OAO will attach a 
Rosetti class member flag (see Attachment 9) to the 
outside of the file and forward the claim file(s) to the appropriate DDS 
for review of the Rosetti class member claim. 
- • - If less than 120 days have elapsed, OAO will attach a 
Rosetti class member flag (see Attachment 10) to 
the outside of the file to ensure the case is routed to the appropriate 
DDS, after expiration of the retention period. Pending expiration of the 
retention period, OAO will also: - -- return unappealed ALJ decisions and dismissals to DFB; and - -- return unappealed Appeals Council denials to the appropriate OAO 
minidocket. 
The respective OAO component will monitor the retention period and, if the 
claimant does not seek further administrative or judicial review, route 
the file(s) to the appropriate DDS in a timely manner.
 D. Processing and Adjudicating Class Member Claims in Conjunction with 
Current Claims (Consolidation Procedures)
Even claims subject to consolidation should be consolidated only to the 
extent practicable. Thus, if consolidation would unreasonably delay a 
decision on the current claim, consolidation is not required.
 - 1.  - General - If a class member has a current claim pending at any administrative level 
and consolidation is warranted according to the guidelines below, the 
appropriate component will consolidate all Rosetti 
class member claims with the current claim at the level at which the 
current claim is pending. 
- 2.  - Current Claim Pending in the Hearing Office - a.  - Hearing Has Been Scheduled or Held, and All Remand Cases - Except as noted below, if a Rosetti class member 
has a request for hearing pending on a current claim, and the ALJ has 
either scheduled or held a hearing, and in all remand cases, the ALJ will 
consolidate the Rosetti case with the appeal on the 
current claim. - 
- The ALJ will not consolidate the claims if - • - the current claim and the Rosetti claim do not have 
any issues in common, or 
- • - a court remand contains a court-ordered time limit, and it will not be 
possible to meet the time limit if the claims are consolidated. 
 
 
- If the claims are consolidated, follow 
Part VI.D.2.c. If the claims are not 
consolidated, follow Part VI.D.2.d. 
- b.  - Hearing Not Scheduled - Except as noted below, if a Rosetti class member 
has an initial request for hearing pending on a current claim and the HO 
has not yet scheduled a hearing, the ALJ will not consolidate the 
Rosetti claim and the current claim. Instead, the 
ALJ will dismiss the request for hearing on the current claim and forward 
both the Rosetti claim and the current claim to the 
DDS for further action (see 
Part VI.D.2.d.). - 
- If the hearing has not been scheduled because the claimant waived the 
right to an in-person hearing, and the ALJ is prepared to issue a fully 
favorable decision on the current claim, and this decision would also be 
fully favorable with respect to all the issues raised by the application 
that makes the claimant a Rosetti class member, the 
ALJ will consolidate the claims. 
 
- If the claims are consolidated, follow 
Part VI.D.2.c. If the claims are not 
consolidated, follow Part VI.D.2.d. 
- c.  - Actions If Claims Consolidated - When consolidating a Rosetti claim with any 
subsequent claim, the issue is whether the claimant was disabled at any 
time from the earliest alleged onset date through the present or to the 
date of the most recent allowance (or through the date the claimant last 
met the prescribed period requirements, if earlier). - If the ALJ decides to consolidate the current claim with the 
Rosetti claim(s), the HO will: - • - give proper notice of any new issue(s) as required by 
20 CFR §§ 
404.946(b) and 
416.1446(b), if 
the Rosetti claim raises any additional issue(s) 
not raised by the current claim; 
- • - offer the claimant a supplemental hearing if the ALJ has already held a 
hearing and the Rosetti claim raises an additional 
issue(s), unless the ALJ is prepared to issue a fully favorable decision 
with respect to the Rosetti claim; 
- • - issue one decision that addresses both the issues raised by the current 
request for hearing and those raised by the Rosetti 
claim (the ALJ's decision will clearly indicate that the ALJ considered 
the Rosetti claim pursuant to the 
Rosetti stipulation and order). 
 
- d.  - Action If Claims Not Consolidated - If common issues exist but the ALJ decides not to consolidate the current 
claim with the Rosetti claim because the hearing 
has not yet been scheduled, the ALJ will: - • - dismiss the request for hearing on the current claim without prejudice, 
using the language in Attachment 11 and the covering notice in Attachment 
12; 
- • - send both the Rosetti claim and the current claim 
to the appropriate DDS for consolidation and further action. 
 - If the ALJ decides not to consolidate the current claim with the 
Rosetti claim because: 1) the claims do not have 
any issues in common or 2) there is a court-ordered time limit, the ALJ 
will: - • - flag the Rosetti claim for DDS review using 
Attachment 13; immediately route it to the appropriate DDS for 
adjudication (photocopies of any relevant material from either file should 
be made and placed in the other file before shipping) and retain a copy of 
Attachment 13 in the current claim file; and 
- • - take the necessary action to complete the record and issue a decision on 
the current claim. 
- • - in those instances where cases return to OHA after new denials at the DDS, 
the ALJ will schedule the consolidated claims for hearing using the 
original request for hearing date to determine scheduling priority. 
 
 
- 3.  - Current Claim Pending at the Appeals Council - The action the Appeals Council takes on the current claim determines the 
disposition of the Rosetti claim. Therefore, OAO 
must keep the claim files together until the Appeals Council completes its 
action on the current claim. The following sections identify possible 
Appeals Council actions on the current claim and the corresponding action 
on the Rosetti claim. - a.  - Appeals Council Intends to Dismiss, Deny Review or Issue a Denial Decision 
on the Current Claim -- No Rosetti Issue(s) Will 
Remain Unresolved. - This will usually arise when the current claim duplicates the 
Rosetti review claim, i.e., the current claim 
raises the issue of disability and covers the entire period adjudicated in 
the Rosetti claim, and the current claim has been 
adjudicated in accordance with the provisions in Listings 14.08 and 
114.08. In this instance, the Appeals Council will consolidate the claims 
and proceed with its intended action. The Appeals Council's order, 
decision or notice of action will clearly indicate that the ALJ's or 
Appeals Council's action resolved or resolves both the current claim and 
the Rosetti claim. 
- b.  - Appeals Council Intends to Dismiss, Deny Review or Issue a Denial Decision 
on the Current Claim -- Rosetti Issue(s) Will 
Remain Unresolved. - This will usually arise when the current claim does not duplicate the 
Rosetti claim, e.g., the current claim raises the 
issue of disability but does not cover the entire period adjudicated in 
the Rosetti claim. For example, the 
Rosetti claim raises the issue of disability for a 
period prior to the period adjudicated in the current claim. In this 
instance, the Appeals Council will proceed with its intended action on the 
current claim. - OAO staff will attach a Rosetti case flag 
(Attachment 13; appropriately modified) to the 
Rosetti claim, immediately forward the 
Rosetti claim to the appropriate DDS for 
adjudication, and retain a copy of Attachment 13 in the current claim 
file. OAO will modify Attachment 13 to indicate that the Appeals Council's 
action on the current claim does not resolve all 
Rosetti issues and that the 
Rosetti class member claim is being forwarded for 
separate processing. OAO staff will include copies of the ALJ's or Appeals 
Council's decision or order or notice of denial of request for review on 
the current claim and the exhibit list used for the ALJ's or Appeals 
Council's decision. 
- c.  - Appeals Council Intends to Issue a Favorable Decision on the Current Claim 
-- No Rosetti Issue(s) Will Remain 
Unresolved. - If the Appeals Council intends to issue a fully favorable decision on a 
current claim, and this decision would be fully favorable with respect to 
all issues raised by the application that makes the claimant a 
Rosetti class member, the Appeals Council should 
proceed with its intended action. In this instance, the Appeals Council 
will consolidate the claims, reopen the final determination or decision on 
the Rosetti claim and issue a decision that 
adjudicates both applications. The Appeals Council's decision will clearly 
indicate that the Appeals Council considered the 
Rosetti claim pursuant to the 
Rosetti stipulation and order. 
- d.  - Appeals Council Intends to Issue a Favorable Decision on the Current Claim 
-- Rosetti Issue(s) Will Remain Unresolved. - If the Appeals Council intends to issue a favorable decision on a current 
claim and this decision would not be fully favorable with respect to all 
issues raised by the Rosetti claim, the Appeals 
Council will proceed with its intended action. In this situation, the 
Appeals Council will request the effectuating component to forward the 
claim files to the appropriate DDS after the Appeals Council's decision is 
effectuated. OAO staff will include the following language on the 
transmittal sheet used to forward the case for effectuation: 
"Rosetti court case review needed -- following 
effectuation forward the attached combined folders to the appropriate 
DDS." 
- e.  - Appeals Council Intends to Remand the Current Claim to an Administrative 
Law Judge. - If the Appeals Council intends to remand the current claim to an 
Administrative Law Judge, it will proceed with its intended action unless 
one of the exceptions below applies. In its remand order, the Appeals 
Council will direct the ALJ to consolidate the 
Rosetti claim with the action on the current claim 
pursuant to the instructions in 
Part VI.D.2.a.  - 
- The Appeals Council will not direct the ALJ to consolidate the claim 
if - • - the current claim and the Rosetti claim do not have 
any issues in common, or 
- • - a court remand contains a court-ordered time limit and it will not be 
possible to meet the time limit if the claims are consolidated. - If the claims do not share a common issue or a court-ordered time limit 
makes consolidation impractical, OAO will forward the 
Rosetti class member claim to the appropriate DDS, 
for separate review. The case flag in Attachment 13 should be modified to 
indicate that the Appeals Council, rather than an Administrative Law 
Judge, is forwarding the Rosetti class member claim 
for separate processing. 
 
 
 
VII. Case Coding
HO personnel will code prior claims into the Hearing Office Tracking 
System (HOTS) and the OHA Case Control System (OHA CCS) as 
“reopenings.” If the prior claim is consolidated with a 
current claim already pending at the hearing level (see 
Part VI.D.), HO personnel will not code 
the prior claim as a separate hearing request. Instead, HO personnel will 
change the hearing type on the current claim to a 
“reopening.” If the conditions described in 
Part VI.D.2.b. apply, the ALJ should 
dismiss the request for hearing on the current claim and HO personnel 
should enter “OTDI” in the “DSP” field.
To identify class member cases in HOTS, HO personnel will code 
“RR” in the “Class Action” field. No special 
identification codes will be used in the OHA CCS.
VIII. Reconciliation of Implementation
At an appropriate time, the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for 
Programs, Policy, Evaluation and Communications' Litigation Staff will 
request SSA components to reconcile their screening activity and 
disposition of class member claims with information available on CATS. 
Within OHA, the OAO Class Action Coordinator is responsible for 
maintaining a personal computer-based record of OHA implementation 
activity (i.e., a record of alerts processed by OHA, and a record of cases 
screened and consolidated by OHA), as reported by HOs and OAO to the 
Coordinator. See HALLEX 
HA 01170.012 with respect 
to reporting requirements.
IX. Inquiries
HO personnel should direct any questions to their Regional Office. 
Regional Office personnel should contact the Division of Field Practices 
and Procedures in the Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge at 
(703) 305-0022. OHA headquarters personnel should contact the Division of 
Litigation Analysis and Implementation at 305-0708.
Attachment 1. Rosetti Stipulation and Order; Approved by 
the Court on July 7, 1994; Entered by the Clerk of Court on July 8, 
1994
| IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | 
| FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA | 
| PETER ROSETTI AND MARY DOE, | ) |  | 
| on behalf of themselves and | ) |  | 
| all others similarly situated, | ) |  | 
|  | ) |  | 
| Plaintiffs, | ) | Civil No. 91-3389 | 
|  | ) |  | 
| v. | ) |  | 
|  | ) |  | 
| DONNA E. SHALALA. | ) |  | 
| Secretary of Health and | ) |  | 
| Human Services, | ) |  | 
|  | ) |  | 
| Defendant. | ) |  | 
WHEREAS, plaintiffs filed a class action complaint on May 28, 1991, 
challenging certain aspects of the Social Security Administration's (SSA) 
evaluation of claims of disability under titles II and/or XVI of the 
Social Security Act due to Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection or 
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS);
WHEREAS, this court dismissed the action by orders dated March 31, 1992, 
and September 2, 1992, after a hearing;
WHEREAS, the Secretary of Health and Human Services published a final rule 
in the Federal Register, after public notice and comment, on the 
evaluation of claims of disability based on HIV infection or AIDS and an 
Immune System Listing on July 2, 1993;
WHEREAS, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated 
the above-noted dismissal orders and remanded the case to consider 
plantiffs' motion for class certification on December 15, 1993;
WHEREAS, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied 
Defendant's Petition for Rehearing with Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc 
on March 9, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid further litigation in this matter and 
to fully and finally resolve this dispute,
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties, 
that:
- 1.  - The class certified under this Stipulation and Order includes individuals 
whose claims for disability benefits under titles II and/or XVI of the 
Social Security Act based in whole or in part on allegations of HIV 
infection or AIDS were finally denied or ceased, in whole or in part, 
while they were residents of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, or the 
Virgin Islands, for medical reasons, or after March 22, 1991, (the first 
business day from 65 days prior to May 28, 1991, the date of filing of the 
complaint in this matter) and before July 2, 1993. The terms of this 
Stipulation and Order providing for review of claims shall not apply if an 
individual receives a final judicial decision on a claim that otherwise 
would be reviewed under the terms of this Stipulation and Order. 
- 2.  - For the purpose of this Stipulation and Order, SSA shall provide relief to 
individuals in the class as follows: - A.  - Within forty-five days after the instructions referenced in paragraph 3, 
infra. have been issued, SSA shall, to the extent practicable, send an 
individual notice (attachment 1) by first-class mail to the last known 
address of every individual who resided in Delaware, New Jersey, 
Pennsylvania, or the Virgin Islands when their title II and/or XVI 
application for disability benefits was finally denied or ceased, for 
medical reasons, based on a determination or decision made on or after 
March 22, 1991, and through July 1, 1993, and whose primary or secondary 
diagnosis code from SSA's data processing systems was “0420” 
(AIDS) or “0430” (Symptomatic HIV) or “0440” 
(Asymptomatic HIV). 
- B.  - Individuals who receive the subparagraph (A) notice must, in order to 
obtain a review of their claim, return the reply form in the pre-addressed 
postage-prepaid envelope enclosed with the notice or through any Social 
Security field office within sixty days after presumptive receipt of the 
notice pursuant to 20 
C.F.R. §§ 404.901 and 
416.1401. If they 
do not respond within sixty days of receipt, their disability claim will 
not be reviewed under this Stipulation and Order unless the claimant 
provides SSA evidence of “good cause” for untimely response 
as defined in 20 C.F.R. 
§§ 404.511 and 
416.1411. 
Individuals who do not receive the subparagraph (A) notice and wish to 
obtain a review of their claim may request review by contacting any SSA 
office until one year after the date the subparagraph (A) notices are 
mailed. Individuals who respond to the subparagraph (A) notice or who 
otherwise request review will receive an acknowledgment letter from SSA 
(attachment 2). 
- C.  - If SSA determines that an individual who responded to the notice or 
otherwise requested review is not in fact a class member, SSA will notify 
the individual in writing (in the form of attachment 3, subject to 
revision) of the reason for that determination and that he or she has 
sixty days from receipt of the notification to write to the Office of the 
General Counsel (OGC), Department of Health and Human Services, 600 
Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore MD 21235, to 
disagree with the determination. If the individual does not write OGC 
disagreeing with the SSA determination within sixty days of receipt of the 
notification under this paragraph, the SSA class determination shall 
become binding and not be subject to further review. OGC will seek to 
resolve these class membership disputes; however, if the dispute cannot be 
resolved, OGC will write the individual stating that the individual must 
request district court review of the SSA class membership determination 
within sixty days of presumptive receipt 
(20 C.F.R. §§ 
404.901 and 
416.1401) of 
OGC's written communication, or the SSA class membership determination 
will become final and not be subject to further review. SSA shall 
contemporaneously provide class counsel with copies of all communications 
sent to potential class members who are determined not to be class 
members. In addition, SSA, upon request, will provide class counsel with 
reasonable and timely access to information concerning the implementation 
of this agreement, including access to potential class members' files for 
the purpose of resolving class membership issues, should they arise, 
subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and any other applicable 
privacy statutes or regulations. 
- D.  - Claims will be reviewed as follows: - 1.  - After the instructions, referenced in paragraph 3, infra, have been 
issued, timely responder claims will be redetermined at the 
reconsideration level of administrative review, 
20 C.F.R. §§ 
404.907 and 
416.1407, except 
as otherwise provided in this paragraph. 
- 2.  - The Secretary's rules, as they may hereinafter be amended, including the 
Immune System Listing for evaluating disability claims involving 
allegations of disabling HIV infection or AIDS, 20 C.F.R. Part 404, 
Subpart P, Appendix 1, will be used in making the redeterminations. 
- 3.  - The redeterminations will be based on the evidence of record upon which 
the claim is based; however, if the Disability Determination Services 
(DDS) cannot redetermine the claim under the Secretary's rules based on 
the original evidence of record, the DDS will request the necessary 
evidence relevant to the time period being redetermined. In addition, a 
class member will be permitted to submit any additional evidence relevant 
to the period being redetermined, and such additional, relevant evidence 
will be considered by DDS in making the redetermination. 
- 4.  - If the redetermination under this Stipulation and Order results in a 
finding that the individual was disabled, the claim will be reopened, and 
the evidence of the class member's disability from the period of the 
previous determination to the present, or to the date of a more recent 
allowance, will be evaluated and new determination will be issued. 
- 5.  - At the option of SSA, Rosetti claimants with subsequent disability claims 
active and simultaneously pending at any administrative level of review at 
the time their Rosetti claim is being evaluated may have all claims 
consolidated and reviewed simultaneously. SSA will use its best efforts to 
ensure that adjudication of the current claims is not delayed by such 
consolidation. 
- 6.  - SSA will exert its best efforts to resolve all claims of Rosetti class 
members as expeditiously as possible. See HALLEX, vol. 1, div. 2, June 
1993, I-2-140.C (TERI cases); POMS 
DI 
E23020.001. 
- 7.  - Class members shall retain all rights to seek further administrative and 
judicial review of determinations or decisions made on readjudication in 
accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 20 C.F.R. Parts 404 and 416 
(1993). 
 
 
- 3.  - SSA will issue instructions to its adjudicators to implement the terms of 
this Stipulation. SSA will make a good faith effort to provide counsel for 
the plaintiffs with draft instructions within 120 days of the date on 
which the District Court enters judgment in this action pursuant to the 
terms of this Stipulation. Counsel for plaintiffs will make a good faith 
effort to provide SSA with their comments on these instructions within ten 
days of counsel's receipt of the instructions. SSA will make a good faith 
effort to issue final instructions within 45 days of receiving the 
comments from counsel for plaintiffs or, if no comments are received, 
within 45 days of the due date for such comments. SSA may, but is not 
required to, incorporate plaintiffs' comments into its instructions. SSA 
will provide counsel for plaintiffs with a copy of the final instructions 
issued to adjudicators and any subsequent revisions to the instructions. 
SSA will not review any prior determinations of Rosetti class members 
until final instructions have been issued. 
- 4.  - Plaintiffs' counsel and defendant's counsel, by their signatures below, 
warrant that they are sole counsel to the plaintiffs and to the defendant, 
respectively, whose interests were represented in this action and that 
they are authorized to stipulate to the resolution of issues in this 
action. 
- 5.  - The question whether plaintiffs are entitled to any attorney's fees, 
expenses, and/or costs, and, if so, the amount of such fees, expenses, 
and/or costs shall be determined at a later date by the parties or by the 
Court upon timely application by the plaintiffs. Notwithstanding any other 
provision of this Stipulation and Order, nothing in this Stipulation and 
Order is, or shall be offered or construed as, a finding or evidence of an 
admission by any party that the position of the defendant in this action 
was or was not substantially justified, nor is this Stipulation and Order 
an admission of liability on the part of defendant for the payment of any 
attorney's fees, expenses, or costs. 
- 6.  - The parties will attempt to resolve any disputes arising under this 
Stipulation by negotiation between counsel or their designees. The parties 
reserve the right to seek a modification of the Stipulation from the court 
in the event of a change in the law. 
- 7.  - Individuals in the class shall be barred and enjoined forever from: - A.  - prosecuting any claims or causes of action that have been or could be 
asserted by reason of, or with respect to, or in connection with, or that 
arise out of any of the matters alleged in this action; and 
- B.  - seeking judicial relief that would have the effect, directly or 
indirectly, of requiring that the redeterminations herein be reopened, 
redetermined, readjudicated, or otherwise reviewed in any manner by 
SSA. - Nothing in this Stipulation shall prevent any class member from pursuing 
an individual administrative appeal, a request for reopening, or a 
judicial appeal, or from asserting that a legal standard was not applied, 
or was improperly applied, in his or her individual case. 
 
- 8.  - The defendant, its administrators or successors, and any department, 
agency, or establishment of the United States and any officers, employees, 
agents, or successors of any such department, agency, or establishment, 
are hereby discharged and released from any claims and causes of action 
that have been asserted in this action, or administratively, by reason of, 
or with respect to, or in connection with, or that arise out of, any 
matters alleged in this action; provided, however, that nothing in this 
paragraph shall relieve the defendant of the duty to comply with this 
Stipulation and Order. 
- 9.  - This Stipulation does not constitute an admission by the defendant of any 
pattern or practice that violates or fails to comply with any law, rule, 
or regulation dealing with any matter within the scope of the allegations 
contained in the complaint or otherwise raised by plaintiffs in this 
action. 
- 10.  -  Final judgment in accordance with the terms hereof shall be entered upon 
entry of this Stipulation and Order. This Stipulation and the covenants 
and conditions contained herein shall become effective upon entry of the 
Stipulation and Order as an Order of the Court. The Court will retain 
jurisdiction in this action only for the purpose of enforcing this 
Stipulation and Order, resolving disputes over whether claimants are 
entitled to redeterminations as provided by paragraph 2 of this 
Stipulation and Order, determining matters concerning modification of this 
Stipulation and Order pursuant to paragraph 6, and determining, upon 
timely application by plaintiffs, whether plaintiffs are entitled to 
attorney's fees, expenses, and/or costs. 
| /s/ | FRANK W. HUNGER | 
| _________________________ |  | 
| CATHERINE C. CARR | Assistant Attorney General | 
| JAMES M. LAFFERTY |  | 
| MARIAN C. NOWELL | MICHAEL R. STILES | 
| Community Legal Services, Inc. | United States Attorney | 
| Law Center South |  | 
| 1226 South Broad Street | /s/ | 
|  | _________________________ | 
| Philadelphia, PA 19146 | BRIAN G. KENNEDY | 
| COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS | /s/ | 
|  | _________________________ | 
|  | CAROL FEDERIGHI | 
|  | Department of Justice | 
|  | Civil Division - Room 1012 | 
|  | 901 E Street, N.W. | 
|  | Washington, D.C. 20510 | 
|  | Tel: (202) 514-1903 | 
|  |  | 
|  | COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT | 
| DATE:
7/5/94 | DATE: 6/30/94 | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
| SO ORDERED: |  | 
| DATED:
7/7/94 | /s/ | 
|  | _________________________ | 
|  | RAYMOND J. BRODERICK | 
|  | United States District Judge | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
| SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICE | 
| Important information | 
________________________________________
From: Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security 
Administration
________________________________________
| Name | ROS | DATE: | 
| Address |  | CLAIM NUMBER: | 
| City, State, Zip | DOC: |  | 
| NOTICE: YOU COULD GET SOCIAL SECRUITY BENEFITS: | 
| READ CAREFULLY! YOU HAVE ONLY 60 DAYS TO RESPOND | 
We may owe you disability money. This is because of a court case called 
Rosetti v. Shalala.
We denied your old disability claim. You can ask us to look at your old 
claim again by sending in the enclosed reply form within 60 days.
IF YOU NOW GET MONEY FROM SOCIAL SECURITY
Even if you now get money from Social Security, we may still owe you more 
disability money.
WHAT YOU NEED TO DO IF YOU WANT US TO REVIEW YOUR CLAIM
FILL OUT THE ENCLOSED REPLY FORM AND SEND IT TO US NOW.
YOU HAVE ONLY 60 DAYS TO DO THIS. DO NOT WAIT OR YOU MAY LOSE THE RIGHT TO 
HAVE YOUR CLAIM REVIEWED.
WHAT WE WILL DO
If you ask us to look again at your old claim, we will review you case. We 
will see if you meet the standards in the Rosetti 
court order for a new review of you old claim. Under these standard, you 
may be eligible for a review of your old claim if we find that the answer 
is “yes” to all of the following questions:
- 1.  - Did you live in Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania or the Virgin Islands 
when we denied your claim or ceased your benefits? 
- 2.  - Was your claim denied or benefits ceased, in whole or in part, on or after 
March 22, 1991, and before July 2, 1993? 
- 3.  - Did you have Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or Acquired Immune 
Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) when we decided your claim? 
If you do not meet the requirements, we will send you a letter that 
explains why.
If we find that you meet all the standards set out in the court order, we 
will give you a new disability decision on your old claim. You can submit 
new evidence about what your medical condition was at the time of the old 
decision. We will notify you about the new decision.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
If you have any questions, you may call your local Social Security office. 
We can answer most questions over the phone. You can also write or visit 
any Social Security office. If you call or visit an office, please try to 
have this letter with you. It will help us answer your questions. The 
address and telephone number of the office that serves your area 
are:
You may also call us toll free at 1-800-772-1213 if you have any 
questions.
If you already have a lawyer or other legal representative, you may show 
the notice to him or her. You do not need a lawyer or legal representative 
to send the reply form back to Social Security.
ESTE ES UN AVISO IMPORTANTE RELACIONADO CON BENEFICIOS DE SEGURO SOCIAL 
FAVOR DE PEDIR QUE SE LO TRADUZCAN IMMEDATAMENTE Y DE LLAMA A SU OFICINA 
DE SEGURO SOCIAL PARA UNA EXPLICACION.
Enclosures
 Reply form and envelope
We are writing to tell you that we received your request for us to look at 
your past claim for disability benefits. If you are eligible for review, 
we will list the standards approved by the Court under the 
Rosetti v. Shalala settlement agreement.
We expect to receive many requests for review and it may take several 
months before we look at your file. When we start the review, we will 
decide if you are a member of the “class” of people included 
in the lawsuit.
If you have a legal representative helping you with your claim, you should 
contact him or her. You also may ask for legal help by contacting the 
lawyers in the Rosetti case. They are:
| Rosetti Counsel | 
| Community Legal Services, Inc. | 
| 1226 S. Broad Street | 
| Philadelphia, PA 19146 | 
| Telephone: | 
If you have any questions, you may call us toll free at 1-800-772-1218, or 
you may contact your local Social Security Office. The address and phone 
number of the Social Security Office that serves your area are shown 
below.
If you call to visit an office, please have this letter with you. It will 
help us answer your questions. Also, if you plan to visit an office, you 
may call ahead to make an appointment. This will help us to serve you more 
quickly.
| ATTACHMENT 2 | 
| [SSA'S Heading] | 
| THIS NOTICE IS ABOUT YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CLAIM | 
| PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY! | 
You asked us to review your case under the terms of the Rosetti 
v. Shalala settlement agreement. We have looked at your case 
and have decided that you are not a Rosetti class member eligible for 
relief. This means that we will not review our earlier decision to deny or 
cease your benefits. The reason you are not a class member eligible for 
relief under the Rosetti settlement agreement is 
checked below.
| WHY YOU ARE NOT A CLASS MEMBER ELIGIBLE FOR RELIEF | 
You are not a Rosetti class member eligible for 
relief because:
[ ] You did not reside in Delaware, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, or the Virgin Islands when your claim was denied or
your benefits ceased.
[ ] You did not receive a final decision denying
your claim or ceasing your benefits, in whole or in part, on or
after March 22, 1991 and before July 2, 1993.
[ ] Your disability claim was not based in
whole or in part on HIV or AIDS.
[ ] Your claim was denied for some reason other
than your medical condition. That reason was
_________________________
 .
[ ] You have received a final decision by a
United States District Court in your claim for disability benefits
that would otherwise be covered by this settlement
agreement.
[ ] You have already received all the benefits
you could receive under the Rosetti settlement agreement.
[ ] Other:
______________________________________
| ATTACHMENT 3 | 
|  | 
| WE ARE NOT DECIDING IF YOU ARE DISABLED | 
It is important for you to know that we are not making a decision about 
whether you are disabled. We are deciding 
only that you are not a 
Rosetti class member eligible for relief.
| IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THIS DETERMINATION | 
You must writewithin 
60 days of when you receive this 
notice to:
| Office of General Counsel (OGC) | 
| Department of Health and Human Services | 
| 600 Altmeyer Building | 
| 6401 Security Boulevard | 
| Baltimore, MD 21235 | 
In addition, you may contact the lawyers representing the 
Rosetti class members, who can be reached as 
follows:
| Rosetti Counsel | 
| Community Legal Services, Inc. | 
| 1226 S. Broad Street | 
| Philadelphia, PA 19146 | 
| Telephone: | 
The Rosetti lawyers can advise you and, if 
appropriate, assist you in notifying Social Security that you disagree 
with the determination.
ESTE ES UN AVISO IMPORTANTE RELACIONADO CON BENEFICIOS DE SEGURO SOCIAL 
FAVOR DE PEDIR QUE SELO TRADUZCAN IMMEDIATAMENTE Y DE LLAMAR A SU OFICINA 
DE SEGURO SOCIAL PARA UNA EXPLICACTION.
| IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | 
| FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA | 
| PETER ROSETTI AND MARY DOE, | ) |  | 
| on behalf of themselves and | ) |  | 
| all others similarly situated, | ) |  | 
|  | ) |  | 
| Plaintiffs, | ) | Civil No. 91-3389 | 
|  | ) |  | 
| v. | ) |  | 
|  | ) |  | 
| DONNA E. SHALALA, | ) |  | 
| Secretary of Health and | ) |  | 
| Human Services, | ) |  | 
|  | ) |  | 
| Defendant. | ) |  | 
| PRIVACY ACT PROTECTIVE ORDER | 
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b) (11), 42 U.S.C. § 1306(a), and 
20 C.F.R. § 
401.340, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
- 1.  - Defendant may disclose to plaintiffs' counsel information required to be 
disclosed to plaintiffs' counsel under the Stipulation and Order executed 
by the parties in this case that is subject to restrictions on disclosure 
under the Privacy and Social Security Acts without obtaining the prior 
written consent of the individual to whom such records pertain, for the 
purposes of monitoring compliance with the Stipulation and Order, 
facilitating implementation of the Stipulation and Order, and assisting 
class members and potential class members in effectuating their rights 
under the Stipulation and Order. Such information consists of names, 
addresses, and claims files of potential class members, and other 
claimant-specific information reasonably relevant to the implementation of 
the Stipulation and Order. 
- 2.  - Plaintiffs' counsel shall use the information disclosed pursuant to 
paragraph 1 of this Order only for the purposes described above. Except as 
provided in paragraph 4 of this Order, plaintiffs' counsel shall not make 
disclosures of such information except: (1) to each other; (2) to members 
of plaintiffs' counsel's staff; (3) to defendants or their agents or their 
counsel; (4) to the Court in this action; or (5) to other persons 
participating in the accomplishment of the purposes described in paragraph 
1. Any disclosure to persons described in item (5) of the preceding 
sentence shall be conditioned upon such persons having read this Order and 
acknowledged in writing that they understand the Order and agree to be 
bound by it. Plaintiffs' counsel shall inform all non-attorney staff in 
their offices who have access to information subject to this order of the 
requirements of this order and shall instruct them to comply with its 
terms. Additionally, plaintiffs' counsel may disclose information 
pertaining to particular class members or potential class members to those 
particular individuals or to representatives acting on behalf of such 
individuals. 
- 3.  - Plaintiffs' counsel and members of their staff shall limit the making of 
copies of the records disclosed pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Order to 
those necessary to the purposes described in paragraph 1. All such copies, 
and any documents created by plaintiffs' counsel or any member of their 
staff that contain information disclosed pursuant to paragraph 1, shall be 
kept confidential, consistent with the Rules of Professional Conduct. All 
such copies and documents concerning individuals who do not individually 
engage class counsel's assistance shall be returned to the defendant or 
destroyed upon the completion of implementation of the Stipulation and 
Order. 
- 4.  - Nothing in this Order shall prejudice the rights of plaintiffs' counsel to 
use the information that they receive pursuant to the Stipulation and 
Order in this action that is not subject to restrictions on disclosure 
contained in the Privacy and Social Security Acts, or their rights to use 
information obtained outside of the context of the Stipulation and 
Order. 
- 5.  - Failure to comply with this Order shall subject the responsible individual 
and/or his or her attorney to appropriate sanctions by the Court, 
including a finding of contempt. 
- 6.  - This Order does not constitute any agreement or ruling as to the 
discoverability or admissibility of any record or information. 
- 7.  - Upon twenty days' notice to the other parties, any party may seek 
modification of this order. 
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7 day of 
July, 1994.
|  | By: /s/ | 
|  | _________________________ | 
|  | RAYMOND J. BRODERICK | 
|  | United States District Judge | 
Approved:
/s/
_________________________
CATHERINE C. CARR
 JAMES M. LAFFERTY
 MARIAN
C. NOWELLCommunity Legal Services, Inc.
 Law Center South
 1226
South Broad Street
 Philadelphia, PA. 19146
Dated:7/5/94
Attorney for Plaintiffs'
 FRANK W. HUNGER
 Assistant
Attorney GeneralMICHAEL R. STILES
 United States Attorney
/s/
_________________________
BRIAN S. KENNEDY
 CAROL FEDERIGHI
 Attorneys,
Department of Justice
 Civil Division - Room 1012
 901
E Street, N.W.
 Washington, D.C. 20530
 Tel: (202)
514-1903
Dated:6/30/94
Attorneys for Defendant
The terms “finally” and “final,” as used herein, 
refer to the date of the administrative decision that became the binding 
decision of the Secretary pursuant to 
20 C.F.R. 
§§404.905, 
404.921, 404.955, 
404.972, 404.981, 416.1405, 416.1421, 416.1455, 416.1472 and 415.1481, and 
do not mean that a class member must have exhausted administrative 
remedies under sections 205(g) and (h) of the Social Security Act, 42 
U.S.C. §405(g) and (h).
 
Attachment 2. ROSETTI COURT CASE FLAG/ALERT
| REVIEW OFFICE | PSC | MFT | DOC | ALERT DATE | 
| FOLDER LOCATION INFORMATION |  |  | 
| TITLE | CFL | CFL DATE | ACN | PAYEE ADDRESS | 
|  | SCREENING OFFICE ADDRESS: |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  | Title II and CON Claims | Title XVI | 
|  |  |  | 
|  | SSA, ODIO | Northeastern PSC or | 
|  |  | Mid-Atlantic PSC | 
|  | Class Action
Section P.O. Box 17369
 Baltimore, Maryland 
21235-0050
 |  | 
|  | ATTN: Rosetti Screening Unit | ATTN: Rosetti Coordinator | 
|  |  |  | 
|  | IF CLAIM IS PENDING IN OHA, THEN SHIP FOLDER TO: | 
|  |  |  | 
|  | Office
of Hearings and Appeals Office of Appellate Operations 
(OAO)
 One
Skyline Tower, Suite 701
 5107 Leesburg Pike
 Falls
Church, VA 22041-3200
 |  | 
|  | ATTN: OAO Class Action Coordinator |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  | (Case locator code 5007) |  | 
 
Attachment 3. Route Slip or Case Flag for Screening
Rosetti Class Action Case
SCREENING NECESSARY
| Claimant's name: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| SSN: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
This claimant may be a Rosetti class member. The 
attached folder location information indicates that a current claim file 
is pending in your office. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached 
alert [and prior claim file(s)] for association, screening for class 
membership, consolidation consideration and possible readjudication.
Please refer to HALLEX Temporary 
Instruction 5-4-44 for additional information and instructions.
|  | TO: | __________________________________ __________________________________
 __________________________________
 __________________________________
 | 
 
| CLASS ACTION CODE: R R   | 
| 1. CLAIMANT'S SSN     ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ ___   | 
| 2. CLAIMANT'S NAME (Last, First)     | 
| 3. DATE OF BIRTH       ___ ___ - ___ ___ - ___ ___   | 
| 4. CLAIM NUMBER      ___ ___ ____ - ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___                  (BIC/ID) | 
| 5. SCREENING DATE       ___ - ___ - ___   | 
| a. SCREENING RESULT   ____MEMBER (J) ____NONMEMBER (F)   | b. SCREENOUT CODE     ___ ___(see item 13 for screenout codes)   | 
| 6. Was a less than fully favorable title II or title XVIdetermination/decision issued on any claim(s) at any administrative level while the claimant was a resident of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania or the Virgin Islands? | Yes___No___ (if No go to 13) | 
| 7. Was the less than fully favorable determination/decision(s) referred to in Question 6 issued at any administrative level on or after March 22, 1991 and before July 2, 1993, and did this become the final decision of the Secretary? (Note: Although not the “final decision of the Secretary,” an Appeals Council denial of a request for review is the last action of the Secretary, and the date of such a denial controls for class membership screening purposes.) | Yes___No___ (if No go to 13) | 
| 8.Did the determination/decision(s) referred to in Question 6 involve an allegation or diagnosis of HIV infection or AIDS? | Yes___No___ (if No go to 13) | 
| 9. Were all determination/decision(s) issued on the potential Rosetti claim(s) based on some reason other than the individual's medical condition (e.g., SGA)? | Yes___No___ (if No go to 13) | 
| 10.Did the individual receive a subsequent fully favorable determination/decision which established entitlement to and paid benefits commencing with the earliest possible month based on the earliest potential Rosetti claim(s)? | Yes___No___ (if No go to 13) | 
| 11.Did the individual receive a final decision/determination, on the merits, on or after July 2, 1993, which covered the entire period at issue in the earliest potential Rosetti claim? | Yes___No___ (if No go to 13) | 
| 12.Did the individual receive a final decision from a federal district or appellate court based on an administrative denial/determination decision on a potential Rosetti claim(s) issued on or after March 22, 1991 and before July 2, 1993? | Yes___No___ (If Yes, go to 13. If No, claimant is a class member entitled to relief. Check member block in item 5.a.) | 
| 13. The claimant is not a Rosetti class member eligible for relief. Check the nonmember block in item 5.a. and enter the screenout code in item 5.b. as follows:Enter
06 if question 6 was answered "NO". Enter 07 if question
7 was answered "NO".
 Enter 08 if question 8 was answered
"NO".
 Enter 09 if question 9 was answered "YES".
 Enter
10 if question 10 was answered "YES".
 Enter 11 if question
11 was answered "YES".
 Enter 12 if question 12 was answered
"YES".
 |     No other screenout code entry is appropriate. | 
| 14. On the lines below, please enter the date(s) of all applications and final decisions considered in the screening process and indicate the administrative level at which the final decision was made (i.e., DDS, ALJ, AC). Date of Application(s)    Date of Decisions     Level of Final Decision _______________    __________________    ________________ _______________    __________________    ________________ _______________    __________________    ________________   | 
| 15. IDENTIFICATION OF SCREENER | COMPONENT   | DATE   | 
|  | INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING ROSETTI SCREENING SHEET | 
Items 1 - 4
You must consider all applications decided during the period covered by 
the court order when making the class membership determination. A SEPARATE 
SCREENING SHEET MUST BE PREPARED FOR EACH DIFFERENT CLAIM NUMBER. Multiple 
applications during the period covered by the court order on the same 
claim number should be screened on the same screening sheet.
Fill in the identifying information as requested. Make sure the Claim 
Number, BIC/ID and SSN, if different from the claim number are correct and 
legible. (If SSN is different from claim number, copy SSN from BOAN/PAN 
field on alert).
Item 5
Complete this information last. Do not fill in the member/nonmember 
information in Item 5 until the screening process is completed.
Questions and Items 6-15 -- General
- a.  - In a multiple claims case, begin screening with the earliest claim in the 
Rosetti period and stop with the last claim in the 
Rosetti period. Remember, a separate screening 
sheet must be completed for each different claim number. Multiple claims 
covered by the court order under the same claim number should be screened 
on the same screening sheet. 
- b.  - To answer the questions in DDS cases, use the SSA-831 for denial cases and 
SSA-832/833 for cessation cases. In OHA adjudicated cases, read the ALJ/AC 
decision to answer the questions. 
- c.  - If the SSA-831/832/833 or OHA decision does not yield enough information 
to answer the questions, look further into the file. 
- d.  - If the claim folder(s) cannot be located, but queries establish that the 
determination(s)/decision(s) was made outside the 
Rosetti timeframe, that the claim was denied for a 
nonmedical reason or that the claimant did not reside in Delaware, New 
Jersey, Pennsylvania or the Virgin Islands, screen out the claim(s) 
without reconstructing the lost folder(s). (See 
DI 
42565.010B.5.c. for more information). 
- e.  - If questions 6-8 are answered “NO,” or questions 9-12 are 
answered “YES,” check the nonmember block found in item 5.a. 
on the screening sheet, then enter the appropriate screenout code in Item 
5.b. as directed in question 13 on the screening sheet. 
- f.  - Remember to follow instructions for members/nonmembers. 
Question 6
Screen for residency as of the date of the final determination/decision, 
not date of application. (See Question 7 for more information.) If the 
claimant was not a resident of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania or the 
Virgin Islands as of the date of the final decision, the claimant is not a 
class member eligible for relief under the Rosetti 
settlement.
Question 7
Screen for date of decision, not date of application. Individuals are 
potentially entitled to relief if they received a denial or less than 
fully favorable decision (e.g., later onset, closed period) between March 
22, 1991, and July 1, 1993, inclusive, which became the final decision of 
the Secretary.
Question 8
Review Items 16a/b of the SSA-831 and Items 22/21 of the SSA-832/833. If 
diagnosis code 0420, 0430, or 0440 is present, indicate “YES” 
for Question 8 and go to the next question. If none of these codes are 
present, also review the disability interview form for an allegation of 
HIV infection, including AIDS. Look at Item D, page 1 of the SSA-3368-BK; 
Item 3a of the SSA-3820-F6; or Item 1a and 1c of the SSA-454-BK, or the 
OHA decision as applicable. If these items indicate that HIV infection or 
AIDS has been alleged, indicate “YES” for Question 8 and go 
to the next question.
Question 9
Check item 33 of the SSA-831 or item 11 of the SSA-832/833. The reg-basis 
codes that indicate a non-medical initial or post-adjudicative denial for 
title II are L1, L2, M7, M8, N1, N2 or S1. N01, N02, N03, N04, N05, N06, 
N09, N10, N11, N12, N13, N14, N17, N33, N44 (for adult claimants only) and 
N54, are the non-medical initial or post-adjudicative denial codes for 
title XVI. For a complete list of the title II denial codes see 
SM 00380.270. For 
a complete list of title XVI denial or payment status codes see 
SM 01005.440 and 
SM 
01305.001F.
Question 10
Review the file and case control queries. Determine if a subsequent 
reversal was fully favorable, allowing the earliest possible 
entitlement/onset date as alleged on the Rosetti 
claim(s). In order for an individual to be screened out under this 
question, benefits must have been paid based on the earliest date of 
entitlement/eligibility. (If full retroactive benefits have not been paid, 
see DI 
42565.010.C.6. for specific routing instructions).
Question 11
Review all claims files and queries to determine whether decision(s) made 
on or after July 2, 1993 readjudicated the merits of the entire period 
covered by the Rosetti claim(s).
Per POMS DI 
27510.001A and 
DI 
27510.005A.1.a., DDS adjudicators generally limit consideration of 
subsequent claims to the period after the previously adjudicated period. 
Therefore, a claim cannot be screened out on the basis of Question 11 
unless it is clear that the DDS adjudicated the entire period covered by 
the Rosetti claim back to the earliest alleged 
onset/entitlement date. At the OHA level, ALJ and Appeals Council 
decisions that do not consider the previously adjudicated period usually 
will indicate that the claimant's request for hearing has been dismissed 
on the basis of res judicata with respect to the previously adjudicated 
period. These cases cannot be screened out.
 Question 12
Screen to determine if a district or appellate court issued a final, i.e., 
unappealed, decision on the Rosetti 
application(s).
The period within which an appeal of a district court decision may be 
filed is 60 days from the date of entry of judgment. For example, a 
district court decision entered on October 2, 1991, became unappealable on 
December 2, 1991, the 61st day after entry of judgment if no appeal was 
filed. Consult the Office of the General Counsel, as needed.
 Item 13
Self-explanatory
Item 14
Fill in the dates of the application(s), decision(s) and the level of 
adjudication of the final decision(s), that were reviewed in deciding 
class membership for the claim number in item 4. Remember a separate 
screening sheet must be prepared for each different claim number.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR MEMBERS
- a.  - Check the “MEMBER” block in item 5.a. of the screening 
sheet. 
- b.  - Sign the form and retain the original screening sheet in the claim 
folder. 
- c.  - OHA Headquarters components will send a copy of the screening sheet 
to: Office of Appellate Operations
 One Skyline Tower,
Suite 701
 Attn: OAO Class Action Coordinator- [The Class Action Coordinator will enter the screening sheet information 
from the screening sheet into a data base and forward the screening sheet 
to the Division of Litigation Analysis and Implementation (DLAI).] - OHA Hearing Office (HO) components will send a copy of the screening sheet 
to: Office of Hearings and Appeals
 Division of Litigation
Analysis and Implementation
 One Skyline Tower, Suite 702
 Falls
Church, VA 22041-3255ATTN: RosettiCoordinator- [DLAI will retain a copy of each screening sheet received from the OAO 
Class Action Coordinator or an HO and forward a copy to Litigation Staff 
at SSA Headquarters for entry into the Civil Action Tracking 
System.] 
INSTRUCTIONS FOR NONMEMBERS
- a.  - Check the “NONMEMBER” block in item 5.a. and enter the 
appropriate screenout code (the number of the question that determined the 
individual is not a class member, numbers 6-12, see Item 13 on the 
screening sheet) in item 5.b. 
- b.  - Follow items b. and c. above. 
- c.  - Prepare and send the class membership denial letter (Attachment 6) to the 
claimant with a copy to his/her representative, if any, and class counsel. 
Retain a copy of the denial letter in the folder. Forward the claim 
file(s) as indicated in HALLEX I-5-444, 
Part V.B.3.a. 
 
Attachment 5. Route Slip for Routing Class Member Alerts and Prior Claim File(s) 
to ODIO or PSC - OHA No Longer Has Current Claim
| ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP |  | DATE | 
| TO: 1. | Initials | Date | 
| 2. |  |  | 
| 3. |  |  | 
| 4. |  |  | 
| 5. |  |  | 
| 6. |  |  | 
| 7. |  |  | 
| __XX_ACTION | _____FILE | _____NOTE AND RETURN | 
| _____APPROVAL | _____FOR CLEARANCE | _____PER CONVERSATION | 
| _____AS REQUESTED | _____FOR CORRECTION | _____PREPARE REPLY | 
| _____CIRCULATE | _____FOR YOUR INFORMATION | _____SEE ME | 
| _____COMMENT | _____INVESTIGATE | _____SIGNATURE | 
| _____COORDINATION | _____JUSTIFY | _____ | 
REMARKS
| Claimant: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| SSN: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
OHA received the attached alert [and prior claim file(s)] for screening 
and no longer has the current claim file. Our records show that you now 
have possession of the current claim. Accordingly, we are forwarding the 
alert and any accompanying prior claim file(s) for association with the 
current claim. After associating the alert with the current claim, please 
forward to ODIO, the NEPSC or MATPSC (using the address indicated on the 
alert) for screening and possible readjudication. 
SEE POMS DI 12565.005 OR DI 42565.005
Attachment
DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals, 
clearances, and similar actions.
| FROM:       Office of Hearings and Appeals | SUITE / BUILDING   | 
|   | PHONE NUMBER _______________   | 
| OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76) *U.S.GPO:1985-0-461-274/20020
Prescribed by GSA
 FPMR
(41 CFR) 101-11.206
 | 
 
Attachment 6. Notice of Non-Class Membership/Ineligibility for Relief
SOCIAL
SECURITY
NOTICE
Important Information
| From: | Department of Health and Human Services Social Security Administration | 
|  |  | 
|  | ____________________________Date:____-____-____ | 
|  |  | 
|  | ____________________________Claim Number:____________________ | 
|  |  | 
|  | ____________________________DOC___________________________ | 
| THIS NOTICE IS ABOUT YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CLAIM. | 
| PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY! | 
You asked us to review your case under the terms of the Rosetti 
v. Shalala settlement agreement. We have looked at your case 
and decided that you are not a Rosetti class member 
eligible for relief. This means that we will not review our earlier 
decision to deny or cease your benefits. The reason you are not a class 
member eligible for relief under the Rosetti 
settlement agreement is checked below.
| WHY YOU ARE NOT A CLASS MEMBER ELIGIBLE FOR RELIEF | 
You are not a Rosetti class member eligible for 
relief because:
| ___ | You did not reside in Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, or the Virgin Islands when your claim was denied or your benefits ceased.   | 
| ___ | You did not receive a final decision denying your claim or ceasing your benefits, in whole or in part, on or after March 22, 1991, and before July 2, 1993.   | 
| ___ | Your disability claim was not based in whole or in part on HIV or AIDS.   | 
| ___ | Your claim was denied for some reason other than your medical condition. That reason was __________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________.   | 
| ___ | You have already received all the benefits you could receive under the Rosetti settlement agreement.   | 
| ___ | You received a final decision by a United States District Court in your claim for disability benefits that would otherwise be covered by this settlement agreement.   | 
| ___ | We made a decision on or after July 2, 1993, which covered the entire time period of at issue in your Rosetti claim.   | 
| ___ | Other:__________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ | 
|  |  | 
| WE ARE NOT DECIDING IF YOU ARE DISABLED | 
It is important for you to know that we are not making a decision about 
whether you are currently disabled. We are deciding only that you are not 
a Rosetti class member eligible for relief.
| IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THIS DETERMINATION | 
You must write within 60 days of when you receive this notice to:
| Office of the General
Counsel (OGC) Department of Health and Human Services
 600
Altmeyer Building
 6401 Security Boulevard
 Baltimore,
MD 21235
 | 
| Class Counsel | 
In addition, you may contact the lawyers representing the 
Rosetti class members, who can be reached as 
follows:
| Rosetti Counsel | 
| Community Legal Services, Inc. | 
| 1424 Chestnut Street | 
| Philadelphia, PA 19102 | 
| Telephone: 1-800-889-4369 or | 
| (215) 981-3750 | 
The Rosetti lawyers can advise you and, if 
appropriate, assist you in notifying Social Security that you disagree 
with this determination.
ESTE ES UN AVISO IMPORTANTE RELACIONADO CON BENEFICIOS DE SEGURO SOCIAL. 
FAVOR DE PEDIR QUE SE LO TRADUZCAN IMMEDIATAMENTE Y DE LLAMAR A SU 
OFFICINA DE SEGURO SOCIAL PARA UNA EXPLICACION.
 
Attachment 7. Route Slip for Non-class Members/Ineligibility for Relief 
Cases
| ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP |  | DATE | 
| TO: 1. MATPSC | Initials | Date | 
| 2. 300 Spring Garden Street |  |  | 
| 3. Philadelphia, PA 19123 |  |  | 
| 4. |  |  | 
| 5. |  |  | 
| 6. |  |  | 
| 7. |  |  | 
| __XX_ACTION | _____FILE | _____NOTE AND RETURN | 
| _____APPROVAL | _____FOR CLEARANCE | _____PER CONVERSATION | 
| _____AS REQUESTED | _____FOR CORRECTION | _____PREPARE REPLY | 
| _____CIRCULATE | _____FOR YOUR INFORMATION | _____SEE ME | 
| _____COMMENT | _____INVESTIGATE | _____SIGNATURE | 
| _____COORDINATION | _____JUSTIFY | _____ | 
REMARKS
| Claimant: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| SSN: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
We have determined that this claimant is not a 
Rosetti class member entitled to relief. (See 
screening sheet and copy of notice of non-class membership/ineligibility 
for relief in the attached claim file(s).) We are forwarding this file to 
your office because the claimant disputes the non-class membership 
determination and class counsel has asked to review the file. 
SEE POMS DI 12565.005
Attachment
DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals, 
clearances, and similar actions.
| FROM:       Office of Hearings and Appeals        | SUITE / BUILDING   | 
|   | PHONE NUMBER _______________   | 
| OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76) *U.S.GPO:1985-0-461-274/20020
Prescribed by GSA
 FPMR
(41 CFR) 101-11.206
 | 
 
Attachment 8. Text for Notice of Revised Class Membership/Eligibility for Relief 
Determination
In an earlier letter that we sent you, we said that you were not a class 
member eligible for relief under the Rosetti v. 
Shalala class action. After reviewing all of the facts, we 
have decided that you are a Rosetti class member 
eligible for relief. Therefore, we will review your claim using the 
standards approved by the court under the Rosetti v. 
Shalala settlement agreement.
We have received many requests for review and it may take several months 
before we look at your claim file.
If you think that you are disabled now, you should fill out a new 
application at any Social Security office.
If you have any questions, you may call us toll-free at 1-800-772-1213, or 
call your local Social Security office at XXX-XXXX. We can answer most 
questions over the phone. You can also write or visit any Social Security 
office. The office that serves your area is located at:
District Office
 Address
 City, ST ZIP
If you do call or visit an office, please have this letter with you. It 
will help us answer your questions. Also, if you plan to visit an office, 
you may call ahead to make an appointment. This will help us serve you 
more quickly.
If you have someone helping you with your claim, you should contact him or 
her. You may also ask for legal help by contacting a legal aid 
organization in your area.
 
Attachment 9. Rosetti Class Member Flag for Headquarters Use (DDS Readjudication 
- Retention Period Expired)
Rosetti Class Action Case
READJUDICATION NECESSARY
| Claimant's name: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| SSN: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
This claimant is a Rosetti class member. 
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached claim file(s) to the DDS for 
readjudication.
[ Send folders to the appropriate DDS.]
 
Attachment 10. Rosetti Class Member Flag for Headquarters Use (DDS Readjudication 
- Retention Period Has Not Expired)
Rosetti Class Action Case
READJUDICATION NECESSARY
| Claimant's name: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| SSN: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
This claimant is a Rosetti class member. After 
expiration of the retention period, forward claim file(s) to the DDS for 
readjudication.
[Send folders to the appropriate DDS.]
If the claimant has filed a civil action and elected to remain in court 
for review of the current claim, forward the 
Rosetti claim file(s) without delay to the 
appropriate DDS for readjudication.
  
| DEPARTMENT OF | 
| HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES | 
| Social Security Administration | 
| OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS | 
|  | 
| ORDER OF DISMISSAL | 
|  |  | 
| IN THE CASE OF | CLAIM FOR | 
| __________________________ | ___________________________ | 
|  |  | 
| __________________________ | ___________________________ | 
This case is before the Administrative Law Judge pursuant to a request for 
hearing filed on 
_________________ 
with respect to the application(s) filed on 
_________________.
In accordance with the Joint Stipulation of the parties and an order of 
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 
in the case of Rosetti v. Shalala, No. 91-3389 
(E.D. Pa. July 7, 1994), the claimant has requested readjudication of the 
final (determination/decision) on the prior application(s) filed on 
______________. 
The claimant has been identified as a Rosetti class 
member and is entitled to have the final administrative denial of the 
prior application(s) reviewed under the terms of the Stipulation and 
Order. Because the claimant's current claim shares certain issues in 
common with the prior claim, the undersigned hereby dismisses without 
prejudice the request for hearing.
The claimant's current application(s) will be associated with the prior 
claim(s) and forwarded to [identify the appropriate DDS by name] 
Disability Determination Service which will conduct the 
Rosetti readjudication.
The Disability Determination Service will notify the claimant of its new 
determination and of the claimant's right to file a new request for 
hearing.
|  |  | _____________________________ Administrative
Law Judge
 | 
|  |  | _____________________________ Date
 | 
 
Attachment 12. Notice Transmitting ALJ Order of Dismissal
Claimant's Name
 Address
 City, State Zip
Enclosed is an order of the Administrative Law Judge dismissing your 
request for hearing and returning your case to the [identify the 
appropriate DDS by name] Disability Determination Service which makes 
disability determinations for the Social Security Administration. Please 
read this notice and Order of Dismissal carefully.
What This Order Means
The Administrative Law Judge has sent your current claim and your 
Rosetti class member claim back to the [identify 
the appropriate DDS by name] Disability Determination Service for further 
processing. The enclosed order explains why.
The Next Action on Your Claim
The [identify the appropriate DDS by name] Disability Determination 
Service will contact you to tell you what you need to do. If you do not 
hear from the [identify the appropriate DDS by name] Disability 
Determination Service within 30 days, contact your local Social Security 
office.
Do You Have Any Questions?
If you have any questions, contact your local Social Security office. If 
you visit your local Social Security office, please bring this notice and 
the Administrative Law Judge's order with you.
Enclosure
cc:
   (Name and address of representative,
if any)
   (Social Security Office (City,
State)) 
Attachment 13. Rosetti Class Member Flag for HO Use (DDS Readjudication)
Rosetti Class Action Case
READJUDICATION NECESSARY
 
| Claimant's Name: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
|  |  |  |  | 
| SSN: | ___________________________ |  |  | 
This claimant is a Rosetti class member. The 
attached Rosetti claim file was forwarded to this 
hearing office for possible consolidation with a current claim.
|  | _______ The Administrative Law Judge has determined that the prior and current claims do not share a common issue and, therefore, should not be consolidated. | 
|  | _____ The claims have not been consolidated because [(state reason(s))]______________________________________________________ | 
|  | ___________________________________________________________. | 
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached alert and prior claim file(s) 
to your location for any necessary Rosetti 
readjudication action.
We are sending the alert and prior file(s) to:
|  | __________________________________ __________________________________
 __________________________________
 __________________________________
 (Destination
code: ___)
 |