TN 26 (12-98)

GN 00306.180 Contract to Adopt

A. Policy — General

1. Existence of Contract

The basis for equitable adoption is an express or implied contract to adopt the child legally, usually between the adopting parents and the child's parents or the person or agency which had custody and control of the child.

See GN 00306.225B. to determine whether an oral agreement is acceptable or whether the agreement must be in writing.

2. Word “Adopt” Not Necessary

In establishing a contract, the parties do not need to have used the word “adopt” or named the legal process for accomplishing adoption. There need be only a clear indication that the parties obligated themselves to take the necessary steps to meet the statutory requirements for legal adoption. If this obligation is established, a contract to adopt may exist although the parties did not know the adoption laws or the required legal proceedings.

3. Consent of Natural Parents

Generally, all States recognizing equitable adoption require the child's natural parents (if alive) either to be parties to the contract or to have consented to it. However, State law may waive this requirement under certain conditions.

EXAMPLE: If the child is illegitimate and paternity has not been established, some States may not require the father's participation in the contract or his consent.

Submit to the RCC under GN 01010.815 ff. in the absence of a precedent opinion if the consent of a parent living at the time of the agreement was not obtained.

4. Authorized Agent

If the mother of an illegitimate child acts through an authorized agent, treat the agent's agreement with the adopting parents and the surrender of the child to them as if the child's mother had dealt directly with the adopting parents.

5. Contract Made Outside State of NH's Domicile

A contract to adopt is usually governed by the law of the State where it was made. However, if the contract was made or performed in a State other than the State of the NH's domicile when the child's claim was filed, ask the RCC per GN 01010.815 ff. for a determination as to the validity of the contract under State law.

B. Policy — Express Contract

An express contract to adopt is one in which the parties expressly agree, in writing or orally, that the child is to be adopted legally. See GN 00306.180A.2. for discussion of use of the word “adopt.”

C. Policy — Implied Contract

1. General

To establish an implied contract, there need be no allegation or direct evidence of a contract to adopt. The contract is implied from the circumstances and conduct of the parties. However, if the terms of an agreement are known, no contract other than that indicated in the agreement may be implied.

2. Criteria

There are no exact rules as to when a contract may be implied. Unless other facts indicate otherwise, a contract to adopt may be implied when:

  1. The circumstances of the transfer clearly indicate that the promise to absolutely relinquish custody and control was exchanged for the adopting parents' promise to give the child the same rights and considerations he/she would have had by law had he/she been their natural child; and

  2. The subsequent conduct and statements of all parties clearly reflect this mutual exchange of promises, and no other inference can reasonably be drawn, e.g.:

    • The natural parents have completely given up custody and control of the child;

    • The adopting parents have taken the child into their home, given him /her their name, supported, educated, and treated him/her as their own over a period of time;

    • The child was known in the community as their child; and

    • The child conducted himself/herself, according to age, as if they were the parents.

Acts such as baptizing the child in the NH's family name where the child has a different surname, or entering the adopting parents' names on the child's public birth record, show an intent to adopt.

3. No Implied Contract

An implied contract does not exist when:

  1. The terms of the agreement are known (in this case the agreement is express); or

  2. There are reasonable grounds for believing that the parties had some other intent at the time of the child's transfer.