TN 14 (12-10)
GN 04440.524 Completing the SSA-392, Medical Consultant's Review of Physical Residual Functional Capacity Assessment
A. Background on using the SSA-392
Federal review medical consultants (MCs) use the SSA-392 to record their agreement or disagreement with the physical residual functional capacity (RFC) assessment established by the adjudicating component (AC) on the SSA-4734-BK, Physical Residual Functional Capacity Assessment.
Use the SSA-392 to:
Identify findings of physical capacity and restriction that are the same as, or different from, those of the adjudicating component;
Cite and discuss the evidence supporting the different finding(s);
Discuss specific problems with the adjudicating component's completion of the SSA-4734-BK; and
Record conclusions as to whether the adjudicating component’s findings on physical RFC are reasonable, consistent with program policy, and supported by the evidence.
For an exhibit of the SSA-392, see GN 04440.929.
B. Policy for completing of the SSA-392
Reviewing MCs complete the SSA-392 to record agreement or disagreement with the physical RFC assessment established by the adjudicating MC or single decision-maker on an SSA-4734-BK. The MC completes the SSA-392 only when there is an SSA-4734-BK in file and a medical-vocational determination is appropriate.
1. When to complete an SSA-392
The MC completes an SSA-392 when:
For further explanation of when to use the SSA-392, see GN 04440.135.
NOTE: When the review component assumes jurisdiction, the reviewing MC prepares an SSA-4734-BK, when appropriate. Do not use the SSA-392 to make a physical RFC assessment, since it is only a review form.
2. When not to complete an SSA-392
The MC does not complete an SSA-392 when:
The adjudicating component (AC) prepared an SSA-4734-BK, but MC review establishes that the AC should have made the disability determination on a medical-only basis (i.e., the impairment is a “not severe” physical impairment, or the impairment is of listing-level severity); or
The disability determination is not supported by sufficient evidence and additional medical evidence is needed (i.e., a medical documentation deficiency), regardless of whether the AC decided the case on a medical-vocational basis.
NOTE: In these situations, the MC records case analysis and disagreement(s) with the RFC determination on an SSA-416 (Case Analysis).
C. Procedure for completing the SSA-392
The items in the heading are self-explanatory. For “Date(s) SSA-4734-BK Applicable,” show the date or range of time covered by the RFC assessment completed by the adjudicating component.
1. Part A – Evaluation
After review of all the evidence, complete Part A.
Indicate whether you agree or disagree that the adjudicating component's conclusion is reasonable and supported by the evidence;
If you agree with all the adjudicating component's findings, proceed to Part C; or
If you disagree with any of the adjudicating component's findings, proceed to Part B.
2. Part B – Discussion and/or Comments
Cite the section and number of each item in dispute, and for each item cited, discuss why the adjudicating component's analysis fails to support particular findings or the RFC assessment in general. In addition:
Explain why particular findings are inconsistent with policy.
Show how the adjudicating component drew erroneous conclusions from the facts.
Describe your findings, including additional limitations or restrictions.
Cite the specific facts upon which you based your conclusions and discuss how and why the evidence in file supports these conclusions.
Consider and discuss, as appropriate, alleged limitations imposed by symptoms such as pain or fatigue.
Resolve all inconsistencies of evidence when the adjudicating component failed to do so.
3. Part C – Conclusion