ISSUED: February 14, 1995; REVISED: June 28, 1996
I. Purpose
This Temporary Instruction (TI) sets forth procedures for implementing the
parties' joint Stipulation and Order, approved by the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on July 7, 1994,
and entered on July 8, 1994, in the Rosetti v.
Shalala class action involving the standard for the evaluation
of disability due to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS).
Adjudicators throughout the country must be familiar with this TI because
of case transfers and because Rosetti class members
who now reside outside of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and the
Virgin Islands must have their cases processed in accordance with the
requirements of the joint stipulation and order.
II. Background
On May 28, 1991, plaintiffs filed a class complaint challenging certain
aspects of the Secretary's evaluation of claims of disability under titles
II and/or XVI of the Social Security Act due to HIV or AIDS.
On December 17, 1991, the Secretary published
Social Security Ruling (SSR)
91-8p in order to revise and update the guidelines for the
evaluation of claims for disability based on allegations of HIV or
AIDS.
By orders dated March 31, 1992, and September 2, 1992, the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed the
action.
On July 2, 1993, the Secretary published a final rule in the
Federal Register establishing new listing
sections called “Immune System” (Listings 14.00 and 114.00).
The new listings included criteria for HIV (Listings 14.08 and 114.08).
These criteria replaced SSR
91-8p, which was rescinded as of the date of the publication of the
new regulations.
On December 15, 1993, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit vacated the district court's dismissal orders and remanded the
case to the district court for consideration of plaintiffs' motion for
class certification. On March 9, 1994, the Court of Appeals denied the
Secretary's petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing
en banc.
In order to avoid further litigation, the parties agreed to settle their
dispute. On July 7, 1994, the district court approved the parties' joint
Stipulation and Order (Attachment 1). The clerk of the court entered the
Stipulation and Order on July 8, 1994.
III. Guiding Principles
Under Rosetti, the Secretary will readjudicate the
title II and title XVI claims of those persons who: 1) respond to notice
informing them of the opportunity for review or who do not receive notice
but who otherwise self-identify and request review (e.g.,
“walk-ins”); and 2) are determined, after screening, to be
class members entitled to relief (see
Parts IV. and V.). The class action
section in the Office of Disability and International Operations (ODIO)
will screen title II and concurrent title II and title XVI claims for
eligibility for class relief, and the Northeastern Program Service Center
(NEPSC) or the Mid-Atlantic Program Service Center (MATPSC) will screen
title XVI only claims, unless there is a current claim, i.e., a potential
class member claim or a subsequent claim, pending in the DDS or OHA, or
stored at OHA. Regardless of the state of the claimant's current
residence, the Disability Determination Services (DDSs) in Delaware, New
Jersey, Pennsylvania and the Virgin Islands will, in most cases, perform
the agreed-upon readjudications, irrespective of the administrative level
at which the claim was last decided.
The DDS servicing the claimant's current address will perform the
readjudication in terminal illness (TERI) cases and if a face-to-face
review is necessary, i.e., cessation case.
OHA will screen cases and perform readjudications under limited
circumstances (see Part V.B.).
Cases readjudicated by the DDS will be processed at the reconsideration
level regardless of the final level at which the claim was previously
decided. The type of readjudication will be a
"redetermination" (see
Part VI.). Class members who receive
adverse readjudication determinations will have full appeal rights (i.e.,
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing, Appeals Council and judicial
review).
Adjudicators will use the disability evaluation standards reflected in
Listings 14.08 and 114.08 in evaluating the disability claims of
Rosetti class members.
Rosetti class member claims should be processed as
expeditiously as possible. (See HALLEX
HA 01210.040 and
HA 01310.005 for TERI
procedures.)
IV. Definition of Class
Except as noted below, for purposes of implementing the terms of the
stipulation and order, the Rosetti class
potentially entitled to relief consists of all individuals who:
•
filed for disability benefits under titles II and/or XVI of the Social
Security Act based in whole or in part on allegations of HIV infection or
AIDS; and
•
were issued a less than fully favorable (i.e., later onset, closed period,
denied or terminated) final administrative determination or decision,
based on medical reasons, between March 22, 1991, and July 1, 1993,
inclusive, while residing in Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania or the
Virgin Islands.
A person is not a class member eligible for class relief if
(1) the last administrative denial or termination received on the
potential Rosetti claim was issued before March 22,
1991, or on or after July 2, 1993; or
(2) the individual received a final judicial decision on the potential
Rosetti claim; or
(3) the individual had a subsequent claim denied on or after July 2, 1993,
and the subsequent claim covered the entire period of disability at issue
in the potential Rosetti claim.
V. Determination of Class Membership and Eligibility for Relief and
Preadjudication Actions
A. Pre-Screening Actions - General
1.
Notification
Within 45 days after SSA issues implementation instructions, SSA shall, to
the extent practicable, send an individual notice to the last known
address of every individual who has been identified by computer run as a
potential class member whose primary or secondary diagnosis code
identified on SSA's data processing system was 0420 (AIDS), 0430 (HIV
symptomatic) or 0440 (HIV asymptomatic). Individuals will have 60 days
from the date of receipt of the notice to request that SSA readjudicate
their claims under the terms of the Rosetti
stipulation and order. SSA will presume an individual's receipt of the
notice five days after mailing, unless the individual establishes that
receipt actually occurred later.
ODIO will contact the servicing Social Security field office (FO) (i.e.,
district or branch office) for development of possible evidence of good
cause for the untimely response. Good cause determinations will be based
on the standards in 20
CFR §§ 404.911 and
416.1411. If good
cause is established, the field office will forward the good cause
determination and any folders currently in the FO, to ODIO (title II
claims and concurrent claims) or the NEPSC or MATPSC (title XVI claims) to
retrieve the folders and for screening.
2.
Alert and Folder Retrieval Process
All response forms should be returned to ODIO so that the information can
be entered into the Civil Actions Tracking System (CATS). CATS will
generate alerts to ODIO. See Attachment 2 for a sample
Rosetti alert.
ODIO will associate the computer-generated alerts with available title II
and concurrent title II and title XVI potential class member claim file(s)
and conduct the screening. For title XVI only claims, the NEPSC or MATPSC
will retrieve available folders, except those found in the Wilkes-Barre
Data Operations Center (Wilkes-Barre), the DDS or OHA, and conduct the
screening. Wilkes-Barre, NEPSC or MATPSC will retrieve available title XVI
claim files and then forward those files to either the NEPSC or MATPSC for
screening (see Part III.).
3.
Alerts Sent to OHA
If ODIO, the NEPSC, MATPSC or Wilkes-Barre determines that a current
claim, i.e., either a potential class member claim or a subsequent claim,
is pending appeal or stored at OHA, it will forward the alert to OHA,
along with any prior claim file(s) not in OHA's possession, for screening,
consolidation consideration and readjudication (if consolidated).
ODIO, the NEPSC, MATPSC or Wilkes Barre will forward all alerts
potentially within OHA jurisdiction and related prior claim files, if any,
to the Office of Appellate Operations (OAO), at the following address
(case locator code 5007):
Office of Hearings and Appeals
Office of Appellate
Operations
One Skyline Tower, Suite 701
5107 Leesburg
Pike
Falls Church, VA 22041-3200
ATTN: OAO Class Action Coordinator
The OAO Class Action Coordinator is responsible for controlling and
reconciling the disposition of class alerts shipped to OHA Headquarters
for association with pending or stored claims. The Coordinator will
maintain a record of all alerts received and the location, if any, to
which they are transferred. This information will be necessary to do the
final class membership reconciliation.
4.
Folder Reconstruction
In general, ODIO, the NEPSC or MATPSC will coordinate any necessary
reconstruction of prior claim files. OHA requests for reconstruction of
potential Rosetti cases should be rare. Prior to
requesting reconstruction, OHA will determine whether available systems
data or other information provides satisfactory proof that the claim would
not confer class membership. OHA (the HO or the OAO branch) will direct
any necessary reconstruction requests to the servicing FO. The request
will be made by memorandum and will include the alert and any accompanying
claim file(s) (if the claim file(s) is not needed for adjudication
purposes) as attachments. The request will also include documentation of
the attempts to locate the file. The memorandum will request the FO to
send the reconstructed file to OHA after it completes its reconstruction
action. HOs will route any reconstruction requests directly to the
servicing FO. The OAO branch will route reconstruction requests through
the OAO Class Action Coordinator. For CATS purposes, HO personnel and the
OAO Class Action Coordinator will forward a copy of the reconstruction
request memorandum to Litigation Staff at the following address:
Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Programs,
Policy,
Evaluation and Communications
Litigation Staff
3-K-26
Operations Building
6401 Security Boulevard
Baltimore,
MD 21235
ATTN: RosettiCoordinatorHO personnel and the OAO branch will identify in the reconstruction
request the OHA location of any existing claim file(s) being retained for
adjudication purposes, and the date(s) of the claim(s) involved.
The HO or OAO will not delay action on a pending claim when a prior claim
is being reconstructed for screening purposes, unless the prior claim is
needed for the adjudication of the pending claim. If OHA completes action
on the pending claim prior to receipt of the reconstructed folder, the HO
or OAO, as appropriate, will forward the class action material, including
the alert, unneeded claim files, if any, and the reconstruction request to
the OAO Class Action Coordinator, along with a copy of the action on the
pending claim. For additional information on reconstruction procedures,
see the Class Action Implementation instructions in
HALLEX
HA 01170.005 C.
5.
Class Membership Denials (Non-Eligibility for Relief)
ODIO, the NEPSC or MATPSC, or OHA, as appropriate, will hold for 90 days
all claim files of individuals to whom SSA sends notice of non-class
membership and ineligibility for relief, pending review by claimants or
class counsel. If an individual wishes to dispute SSA's class
membership/eligibility for relief determination, he or she must give
timely written notice of the disagreement to the Office of the General
Counsel (OGC) (i.e., within 60 days of receipt of notice that the
individual is not a class member eligible for relief). Upon request, class
counsel, subject to the Privacy Act Protective Order, will be given
reasonable and timely access to potential class members' claim files for
the purpose of resolving class membership disputes. Upon request by class
counsel to review claim files, the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for
Programs' Litigation Staff will coordinate with ODIO, the NEPSC or MATPSC,
or OHA to forward the claim files to:
MATPSC
300 Spring Garden Street
Philadelphia,
PA 19123
1.
Determining Jurisdiction for Screening
a.
Current Claim in OHA
As provided in Part V.A.3., if there is a
current claim pending or stored at OHA Headquarters, the OAO Class Action
Coordinator will receive the alert and related
Rosetti claim file(s). The OAO Class Action
Coordinator will determine OHA jurisdiction for screening and forward as
follows.
•
If the current claim is in an HO, the Coordinator will forward the alert
and any prior claim file(s) to the HO for screening using Attachment 3.
(Part V.B.2.a. provides instructions to
HOs regarding the action to be taken if they receive an alert package but
no longer have a current claim pending.)
•
If the current claim is before the Appeals Council, or is located in an
OAO branch mini-docket or in an OAO Docket and Files Branch (DFB), the
Coordinator will forward the alert and any prior claim file(s) to the
appropriate OAO branch for screening using Attachment 3.
(Part V.B.2.a. provides instructions to
the OAO branches regarding the action to be taken if they receive an alert
package but no longer have a current claim pending.)
If the Coordinator (or designee) is unable to locate the current claim
file within OHA, the Coordinator (or designee) will broaden the claim file
search and arrange for alert transfer or folder reconstruction, as
necessary.
b.
Current Claim Pending in Court
If the OAO Class Action Coordinator receives an alert for a claimant who
has a civil action pending, either on the alerted case or on a subsequent
or prior claim, the Coordinator will forward the alert and any
accompanying claim file(s) to the appropriate OAO Court Case Preparation
and Review Branch (CCPRB) for screening using Attachment 3. See
Part V.B.2.b. for special screening
instructions when a civil action is involved.
2.
Screening
a.
General Instructions
The screening component will associate the alert and any prior claim
file(s) with the claim file(s) in its possession and complete a screening
sheet (see Attachment 4) as follows:
If the claim pending at OHA is the potential class member claim, then the
individual is not a class member entitled to relief under
Rosetti (see
Part IV.). Complete the screening sheet
and follow the instructions in
Part V.B.3.a. for processing the claims
of individuals who are not class members eligible for relief.
•
Consider all applications denied/ceased during the
Rosetti timeframe;
Although not the “final decision of the Commissioner,” an
Appeals Council denial of a request for review is the last action of the
Commissioner, and the date of such denial controls for class membership
screening purposes.
•
Follow all instructions on the screening sheet;
•
Sign and date the original screening sheet, place it in the claim file (on
the top right side of the file); and
•
If the screening component is an OHA headquarters component, forward a
copy of the screening sheet to the OAO Class Action Coordinator at the
address in Part V.A.3. (The Coordinator
will enter information from the screening sheet into a database and will
forward a copy of the screening sheet to the Division of Litigation
Analysis and Implementation (DLAI).) If the screening component is an HO,
forward a copy of the screening sheet directly to DLAI at the following
address:
Office of Hearings and Appeals
Division of Litigation
Analysis and
Implementation
One
Skyline Tower, Suite 702
5107 Leesburg Pike
Falls
Church, VA 22041-3255HO personnel may also forward material by telefax to DLAI at (703)
305-0655. (DLAI will retain a copy of each screening sheet and forward a
copy to Litigation Staff.)
If the HO receives an alert only or an alert associated with a prior claim
file(s) for screening, and no longer has the current claim file, it will
return or forward the alert and any prior claim file(s) to the OAO Class
Action Coordinator (see address in
Part V.A.3.), and advise the Coordinator
of the action taken on the current claim and its destination. The
Coordinator will determine the claim file location and, if it is located
in OHA headquarters, will forward the alert and any accompanying prior
claim file(s) to the responsible OAO branch for screening, using
Attachment 3. If the file(s) is no longer in OHA, the Coordinator will use
Attachment 5 to send the alert and any accompanying prior claim file(s) to
the non-OHA location.
If an OAO branch receives an alert only, or an alert associated with a
prior claim file(s) and no longer has the current claim file (and it is
not located in mini-dockets or an OAO DFB), it will determine the location
of the current claim file. If the current claim file is located within
OHA, the OAO branch will use Attachment 3 to forward the material to the
OHA location. If the file(s) is no longer in OHA, the OAO branch will use
Attachment 5 to forward the material to the non-OHA location. The OAO
branch will also advise the OAO Class Action Coordinator of its
actions.
Final determinations or decisions made on or after July 2, 1993, on a
subsequent claim filed by a potential Rosetti class
member may have adjudicated the entire timeframe covered by the
Rosetti claim. Instead of applying the doctrine of
administrative res judicata to the Rosetti claim, a
non-class membership/ineligibility for relief determination must be
made.
b.
Special OAO Screening Instructions if a Civil Action Is Involved
As noted in Part V.B.1.b., the CCPRB will
screen for Rosetti class membership/eligibility for
relief when a civil action is involved. The CCPRB's class
membership/eligibility for relief determination will dictate the
appropriate post-screening action.
•
If the claim pending in court is the potential class member claim, the
CCPRB will immediately notify OGC so that OGC can notify the claimant of
the option to have the case remanded for readjudication under
Rosetti.
•
If the claim pending in court is a subsequent claim and was adjudicated in
accordance with the disability evaluation standards reflected in Listings
14.08 and 114.08 and resolved all Rosetti issues,
the claimant is not a Rosetti class member entitled
to relief. The CCPRB will follow the instructions in
Part V.B.3.a. for processing such
claims.
•
If the claim pending in court was adjudicated in accordance with Listings
14.08 and 114.08, but did not resolve all Rosetti
issues, e.g., there is a prior (inactive) claim and the current claim did
not adjudicate the entire period covered by the
Rosetti claim, the CCPRB will forward the
Rosetti claim to the appropriate DDS for separate
review. The CCPRB will modify the case flag in Attachment 13 to indicate
that the pending court case does not resolve all
Rosetti issues and that the
Rosetti class member claim is being forwarded for
separate processing. The CCPRB will notify the Class Action Coordinator of
its action.
•
If the final administrative decision on the claim pending in court was not
adjudicated in accordance with the disability evaluation standards
reflected in Listings 14.08 and 114.08, or is legally insufficient for
other reasons, the CCPRB will initiate voluntary remand proceedings and
consolidate the claims.
3.
Post-Screening Actions
a.
Screened Out Cases
If the screening component determines that the individual is not a class
member eligible for relief, the component will:
•
notify the individual and representative, if any, (with a copy to class
counsel) of that determination using Attachment 6 (modified as necessary
to fit the circumstances and posture of the case when there is a current
claim);
Include the date and claim number at the top of Attachment 6 in the spaces
indicated.
•
retain a copy of the notice in the claim file;
•
send a copy of the notice to Rosetti class
counsel:
Community Legal Services, Inc.
1424 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia,
PA 19102An individual who wishes to dispute a determination of non-class
membership and ineligibility for relief may do so directly, through their
representative of record, or through Rosetti class
counsel.
•
retain the claim file(s) for 90 days pending a possible class membership
dispute;
•
if class counsel makes a timely request to review a screened out claim
file, send the file to:
MATPSC
300 Spring Garden Street
Philadelphia,
PA 19123using the pre-addressed route slip in Attachment 7;
Photocopy any material contained in the prior file that is relevant to the
current claim and place it in the current claim file before shipping the
prior file.
•
if SSA, through OGC, resolves the dispute in the claimant's favor: 1) the
original screening component or Litigation Staff will prepare a revised
screening sheet and send notice of the revised class
membership/eligibility for relief determination (Attachment 8) to the
claimant, or representative, if any, and class counsel; 2) OHA
jurisdiction cases will proceed in accordance with
Part VI.; 3) the rescreening component
will notify DLAI of the revised determination by forwarding a copy of the
revised screening sheet to DLAI; and 4) DLAI will coordinate with the OAO
Class Action Coordinator as necessary.
•
if the dispute cannot be resolved, OGC will send the claimant, and class
counsel, a notice indicating that the claimant will have 60 days to
request district court review of the class membership/eligibility for
relief determination.
•
if after 90 days no review is requested, return the file(s) to the
appropriate storage location if not otherwise needed.
b.
Cases Determined to Be Class Members Entitled to Relief
If the screening component determines that the individual is a class
member entitled to relief, it will proceed with processing and
adjudication in accordance with the instructions in
Part VI.
VI. Processing and Adjudication
A. Cases Reviewed by the DDS
The Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Virgin Islands DDSs, or any
other DDSs servicing residents of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania or
the Virgin Islands, will usually conduct the first
Rosetti review. An exception may apply when the
Rosetti claim is a TERI case. An exception will
also apply for cases consolidated at the OHA level (see
Part VI.E.). The DDS determination will
be a reconsideration determination, regardless of the administrative level
at which the class member claim(s) was previously decided, with full
appeal rights (i.e., ALJ hearing, Appeals Council and judicial review).
(See Part VI.B.)
B. OHA Adjudication of Class Member Claims
The following instructions apply to both consolidation cases in which the
ALJ or Appeals Council conducts the Rosetti
readjudication and to DDS readjudication cases in which the claimant
requests a hearing or Appeals Council review. Except as noted herein, HOs
and OHA Headquarters will process Rosetti class
member cases according to all other current practices and procedures
including coding, developing evidence, routing, etc. However, pursuant to
the parties' stipulation and order, SSA must exert its best efforts to
resolve all Rosetti class members' claims as
expeditiously as possible.
Implementation of the Rosetti order must never
delay the processing of TERI claims and must never interfere with the
operation of TERI procedures on such claims. (See
HALLEX
HA 01210.040 and
HA 01310.005.)
1.
Type of Review and Period to Be Considered
a.
Pursuant to the Rosetti Stipulation and Order,
regardless of whether the claim under review is an initial claim or a
cessation case, the type of review to be conducted is a
redetermination. The redetermination
shall be a de
novo evaluation of the class
member's eligibility for benefits based on all evidence in his or her file
including newly obtained evidence relevant to the period that was at issue
in the administrative determination or decision(s) that forms the basis
for Rosetti class membership.
b.
If the redetermination results in a favorable decision, the adjudicator
will determine whether the individual's disability has been continuous
through the date of the redetermination or to the date of the most recent
allowance.
c.
If the evidence establishes that disability began only at some point after
the administrative determination(s)/decision(s) that forms the basis for
Rosetti class membership, the class member must
file a new application to establish eligibility.
2.
Disability Evaluation Standards
Adjudicators must use the disability evaluation standards reflected in
Listings 14.08 and 114.08 for evaluating disability based on allegations
of HIV or AIDS in class member claims.
3.
Class Member Is Deceased
If a class member is deceased, the usual survivor and substitute party
provisions and existing procedures for determining distribution of any
potential underpayment apply.
C. Claim at OHA But No Current Action Pending
If a claim file (either a class member or a subsequent claim) is located
in OHA Headquarters but there is no claim actively pending administrative
review, i.e., Headquarters is holding the file awaiting potential receipt
of a request for review or notification that a civil action has been
filed, OAO will associate the alert with the file and screen for class
membership. (The OAO Class Action Coordinator will coordinate the
necessary actions as explained in
Part V.) (See
Part V.B.3., for non-class member
processing instructions.)
•
If the 120-day retention period for holding a claim file after an ALJ
decision or Appeals Council action has expired, OAO will attach a
Rosetti class member flag (see Attachment 9) to the
outside of the file and forward the claim file(s) to the appropriate DDS
for review of the Rosetti class member claim.
•
If less than 120 days have elapsed, OAO will attach a
Rosetti class member flag (see Attachment 10) to
the outside of the file to ensure the case is routed to the appropriate
DDS, after expiration of the retention period. Pending expiration of the
retention period, OAO will also:
-- return unappealed ALJ decisions and dismissals to DFB; and
-- return unappealed Appeals Council denials to the appropriate OAO
minidocket.
The respective OAO component will monitor the retention period and, if the
claimant does not seek further administrative or judicial review, route
the file(s) to the appropriate DDS in a timely manner.
D. Processing and Adjudicating Class Member Claims in Conjunction with
Current Claims (Consolidation Procedures)
Even claims subject to consolidation should be consolidated only to the
extent practicable. Thus, if consolidation would unreasonably delay a
decision on the current claim, consolidation is not required.
1.
General
If a class member has a current claim pending at any administrative level
and consolidation is warranted according to the guidelines below, the
appropriate component will consolidate all Rosetti
class member claims with the current claim at the level at which the
current claim is pending.
2.
Current Claim Pending in the Hearing Office
a.
Hearing Has Been Scheduled or Held, and All Remand Cases
Except as noted below, if a Rosetti class member
has a request for hearing pending on a current claim, and the ALJ has
either scheduled or held a hearing, and in all remand cases, the ALJ will
consolidate the Rosetti case with the appeal on the
current claim.
The ALJ will not consolidate the claims if
•
the current claim and the Rosetti claim do not have
any issues in common, or
•
a court remand contains a court-ordered time limit, and it will not be
possible to meet the time limit if the claims are consolidated.
If the claims are consolidated, follow
Part VI.D.2.c. If the claims are not
consolidated, follow Part VI.D.2.d.
b.
Hearing Not Scheduled
Except as noted below, if a Rosetti class member
has an initial request for hearing pending on a current claim and the HO
has not yet scheduled a hearing, the ALJ will not consolidate the
Rosetti claim and the current claim. Instead, the
ALJ will dismiss the request for hearing on the current claim and forward
both the Rosetti claim and the current claim to the
DDS for further action (see
Part VI.D.2.d.).
If the hearing has not been scheduled because the claimant waived the
right to an in-person hearing, and the ALJ is prepared to issue a fully
favorable decision on the current claim, and this decision would also be
fully favorable with respect to all the issues raised by the application
that makes the claimant a Rosetti class member, the
ALJ will consolidate the claims.
If the claims are consolidated, follow
Part VI.D.2.c. If the claims are not
consolidated, follow Part VI.D.2.d.
c.
Actions If Claims Consolidated
When consolidating a Rosetti claim with any
subsequent claim, the issue is whether the claimant was disabled at any
time from the earliest alleged onset date through the present or to the
date of the most recent allowance (or through the date the claimant last
met the prescribed period requirements, if earlier).
If the ALJ decides to consolidate the current claim with the
Rosetti claim(s), the HO will:
•
give proper notice of any new issue(s) as required by
20 CFR §§
404.946(b) and
416.1446(b), if
the Rosetti claim raises any additional issue(s)
not raised by the current claim;
•
offer the claimant a supplemental hearing if the ALJ has already held a
hearing and the Rosetti claim raises an additional
issue(s), unless the ALJ is prepared to issue a fully favorable decision
with respect to the Rosetti claim;
•
issue one decision that addresses both the issues raised by the current
request for hearing and those raised by the Rosetti
claim (the ALJ's decision will clearly indicate that the ALJ considered
the Rosetti claim pursuant to the
Rosetti stipulation and order).
d.
Action If Claims Not Consolidated
If common issues exist but the ALJ decides not to consolidate the current
claim with the Rosetti claim because the hearing
has not yet been scheduled, the ALJ will:
•
dismiss the request for hearing on the current claim without prejudice,
using the language in Attachment 11 and the covering notice in Attachment
12;
•
send both the Rosetti claim and the current claim
to the appropriate DDS for consolidation and further action.
If the ALJ decides not to consolidate the current claim with the
Rosetti claim because: 1) the claims do not have
any issues in common or 2) there is a court-ordered time limit, the ALJ
will:
•
flag the Rosetti claim for DDS review using
Attachment 13; immediately route it to the appropriate DDS for
adjudication (photocopies of any relevant material from either file should
be made and placed in the other file before shipping) and retain a copy of
Attachment 13 in the current claim file; and
•
take the necessary action to complete the record and issue a decision on
the current claim.
•
in those instances where cases return to OHA after new denials at the DDS,
the ALJ will schedule the consolidated claims for hearing using the
original request for hearing date to determine scheduling priority.
3.
Current Claim Pending at the Appeals Council
The action the Appeals Council takes on the current claim determines the
disposition of the Rosetti claim. Therefore, OAO
must keep the claim files together until the Appeals Council completes its
action on the current claim. The following sections identify possible
Appeals Council actions on the current claim and the corresponding action
on the Rosetti claim.
a.
Appeals Council Intends to Dismiss, Deny Review or Issue a Denial Decision
on the Current Claim -- No Rosetti Issue(s) Will
Remain Unresolved.
This will usually arise when the current claim duplicates the
Rosetti review claim, i.e., the current claim
raises the issue of disability and covers the entire period adjudicated in
the Rosetti claim, and the current claim has been
adjudicated in accordance with the provisions in Listings 14.08 and
114.08. In this instance, the Appeals Council will consolidate the claims
and proceed with its intended action. The Appeals Council's order,
decision or notice of action will clearly indicate that the ALJ's or
Appeals Council's action resolved or resolves both the current claim and
the Rosetti claim.
b.
Appeals Council Intends to Dismiss, Deny Review or Issue a Denial Decision
on the Current Claim -- Rosetti Issue(s) Will
Remain Unresolved.
This will usually arise when the current claim does not duplicate the
Rosetti claim, e.g., the current claim raises the
issue of disability but does not cover the entire period adjudicated in
the Rosetti claim. For example, the
Rosetti claim raises the issue of disability for a
period prior to the period adjudicated in the current claim. In this
instance, the Appeals Council will proceed with its intended action on the
current claim.
OAO staff will attach a Rosetti case flag
(Attachment 13; appropriately modified) to the
Rosetti claim, immediately forward the
Rosetti claim to the appropriate DDS for
adjudication, and retain a copy of Attachment 13 in the current claim
file. OAO will modify Attachment 13 to indicate that the Appeals Council's
action on the current claim does not resolve all
Rosetti issues and that the
Rosetti class member claim is being forwarded for
separate processing. OAO staff will include copies of the ALJ's or Appeals
Council's decision or order or notice of denial of request for review on
the current claim and the exhibit list used for the ALJ's or Appeals
Council's decision.
c.
Appeals Council Intends to Issue a Favorable Decision on the Current Claim
-- No Rosetti Issue(s) Will Remain
Unresolved.
If the Appeals Council intends to issue a fully favorable decision on a
current claim, and this decision would be fully favorable with respect to
all issues raised by the application that makes the claimant a
Rosetti class member, the Appeals Council should
proceed with its intended action. In this instance, the Appeals Council
will consolidate the claims, reopen the final determination or decision on
the Rosetti claim and issue a decision that
adjudicates both applications. The Appeals Council's decision will clearly
indicate that the Appeals Council considered the
Rosetti claim pursuant to the
Rosetti stipulation and order.
d.
Appeals Council Intends to Issue a Favorable Decision on the Current Claim
-- Rosetti Issue(s) Will Remain Unresolved.
If the Appeals Council intends to issue a favorable decision on a current
claim and this decision would not be fully favorable with respect to all
issues raised by the Rosetti claim, the Appeals
Council will proceed with its intended action. In this situation, the
Appeals Council will request the effectuating component to forward the
claim files to the appropriate DDS after the Appeals Council's decision is
effectuated. OAO staff will include the following language on the
transmittal sheet used to forward the case for effectuation:
"Rosetti court case review needed -- following
effectuation forward the attached combined folders to the appropriate
DDS."
e.
Appeals Council Intends to Remand the Current Claim to an Administrative
Law Judge.
If the Appeals Council intends to remand the current claim to an
Administrative Law Judge, it will proceed with its intended action unless
one of the exceptions below applies. In its remand order, the Appeals
Council will direct the ALJ to consolidate the
Rosetti claim with the action on the current claim
pursuant to the instructions in
Part VI.D.2.a.
The Appeals Council will not direct the ALJ to consolidate the claim
if
•
the current claim and the Rosetti claim do not have
any issues in common, or
•
a court remand contains a court-ordered time limit and it will not be
possible to meet the time limit if the claims are consolidated.
If the claims do not share a common issue or a court-ordered time limit
makes consolidation impractical, OAO will forward the
Rosetti class member claim to the appropriate DDS,
for separate review. The case flag in Attachment 13 should be modified to
indicate that the Appeals Council, rather than an Administrative Law
Judge, is forwarding the Rosetti class member claim
for separate processing.
VII. Case Coding
HO personnel will code prior claims into the Hearing Office Tracking
System (HOTS) and the OHA Case Control System (OHA CCS) as
“reopenings.” If the prior claim is consolidated with a
current claim already pending at the hearing level (see
Part VI.D.), HO personnel will not code
the prior claim as a separate hearing request. Instead, HO personnel will
change the hearing type on the current claim to a
“reopening.” If the conditions described in
Part VI.D.2.b. apply, the ALJ should
dismiss the request for hearing on the current claim and HO personnel
should enter “OTDI” in the “DSP” field.
To identify class member cases in HOTS, HO personnel will code
“RR” in the “Class Action” field. No special
identification codes will be used in the OHA CCS.
VIII. Reconciliation of Implementation
At an appropriate time, the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for
Programs, Policy, Evaluation and Communications' Litigation Staff will
request SSA components to reconcile their screening activity and
disposition of class member claims with information available on CATS.
Within OHA, the OAO Class Action Coordinator is responsible for
maintaining a personal computer-based record of OHA implementation
activity (i.e., a record of alerts processed by OHA, and a record of cases
screened and consolidated by OHA), as reported by HOs and OAO to the
Coordinator. See HALLEX
HA 01170.012 with respect
to reporting requirements.
IX. Inquiries
HO personnel should direct any questions to their Regional Office.
Regional Office personnel should contact the Division of Field Practices
and Procedures in the Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge at
(703) 305-0022. OHA headquarters personnel should contact the Division of
Litigation Analysis and Implementation at 305-0708.
Attachment 1. Rosetti Stipulation and Order; Approved by
the Court on July 7, 1994; Entered by the Clerk of Court on July 8,
1994
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT |
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA |
PETER ROSETTI AND MARY DOE, |
) |
|
on behalf of themselves and |
) |
|
all others similarly situated, |
) |
|
|
) |
|
Plaintiffs,
|
) |
Civil No. 91-3389
|
|
) |
|
v. |
) |
|
|
) |
|
DONNA E. SHALALA. |
) |
|
Secretary of Health and |
) |
|
Human Services, |
) |
|
|
) |
|
Defendant.
|
) |
|
WHEREAS, plaintiffs filed a class action complaint on May 28, 1991,
challenging certain aspects of the Social Security Administration's (SSA)
evaluation of claims of disability under titles II and/or XVI of the
Social Security Act due to Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection or
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS);
WHEREAS, this court dismissed the action by orders dated March 31, 1992,
and September 2, 1992, after a hearing;
WHEREAS, the Secretary of Health and Human Services published a final rule
in the Federal Register, after public notice and comment, on the
evaluation of claims of disability based on HIV infection or AIDS and an
Immune System Listing on July 2, 1993;
WHEREAS, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit vacated
the above-noted dismissal orders and remanded the case to consider
plantiffs' motion for class certification on December 15, 1993;
WHEREAS, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied
Defendant's Petition for Rehearing with Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc
on March 9, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid further litigation in this matter and
to fully and finally resolve this dispute,
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties,
that:
1.
The class certified under this Stipulation and Order includes individuals
whose claims for disability benefits under titles II and/or XVI of the
Social Security Act based in whole or in part on allegations of HIV
infection or AIDS were finally denied or ceased, in whole or in part,
while they were residents of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, or the
Virgin Islands, for medical reasons, or after March 22, 1991, (the first
business day from 65 days prior to May 28, 1991, the date of filing of the
complaint in this matter) and before July 2, 1993. The terms of this
Stipulation and Order providing for review of claims shall not apply if an
individual receives a final judicial decision on a claim that otherwise
would be reviewed under the terms of this Stipulation and Order.
2.
For the purpose of this Stipulation and Order, SSA shall provide relief to
individuals in the class as follows:
A.
Within forty-five days after the instructions referenced in paragraph 3,
infra. have been issued, SSA shall, to the extent practicable, send an
individual notice (attachment 1) by first-class mail to the last known
address of every individual who resided in Delaware, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, or the Virgin Islands when their title II and/or XVI
application for disability benefits was finally denied or ceased, for
medical reasons, based on a determination or decision made on or after
March 22, 1991, and through July 1, 1993, and whose primary or secondary
diagnosis code from SSA's data processing systems was “0420”
(AIDS) or “0430” (Symptomatic HIV) or “0440”
(Asymptomatic HIV).
B.
Individuals who receive the subparagraph (A) notice must, in order to
obtain a review of their claim, return the reply form in the pre-addressed
postage-prepaid envelope enclosed with the notice or through any Social
Security field office within sixty days after presumptive receipt of the
notice pursuant to 20
C.F.R. §§ 404.901 and
416.1401. If they
do not respond within sixty days of receipt, their disability claim will
not be reviewed under this Stipulation and Order unless the claimant
provides SSA evidence of “good cause” for untimely response
as defined in 20 C.F.R.
§§ 404.511 and
416.1411.
Individuals who do not receive the subparagraph (A) notice and wish to
obtain a review of their claim may request review by contacting any SSA
office until one year after the date the subparagraph (A) notices are
mailed. Individuals who respond to the subparagraph (A) notice or who
otherwise request review will receive an acknowledgment letter from SSA
(attachment 2).
C.
If SSA determines that an individual who responded to the notice or
otherwise requested review is not in fact a class member, SSA will notify
the individual in writing (in the form of attachment 3, subject to
revision) of the reason for that determination and that he or she has
sixty days from receipt of the notification to write to the Office of the
General Counsel (OGC), Department of Health and Human Services, 600
Altmeyer Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore MD 21235, to
disagree with the determination. If the individual does not write OGC
disagreeing with the SSA determination within sixty days of receipt of the
notification under this paragraph, the SSA class determination shall
become binding and not be subject to further review. OGC will seek to
resolve these class membership disputes; however, if the dispute cannot be
resolved, OGC will write the individual stating that the individual must
request district court review of the SSA class membership determination
within sixty days of presumptive receipt
(20 C.F.R. §§
404.901 and
416.1401) of
OGC's written communication, or the SSA class membership determination
will become final and not be subject to further review. SSA shall
contemporaneously provide class counsel with copies of all communications
sent to potential class members who are determined not to be class
members. In addition, SSA, upon request, will provide class counsel with
reasonable and timely access to information concerning the implementation
of this agreement, including access to potential class members' files for
the purpose of resolving class membership issues, should they arise,
subject to the requirements of the Privacy Act and any other applicable
privacy statutes or regulations.
D.
Claims will be reviewed as follows:
1.
After the instructions, referenced in paragraph 3, infra, have been
issued, timely responder claims will be redetermined at the
reconsideration level of administrative review,
20 C.F.R. §§
404.907 and
416.1407, except
as otherwise provided in this paragraph.
2.
The Secretary's rules, as they may hereinafter be amended, including the
Immune System Listing for evaluating disability claims involving
allegations of disabling HIV infection or AIDS, 20 C.F.R. Part 404,
Subpart P, Appendix 1, will be used in making the redeterminations.
3.
The redeterminations will be based on the evidence of record upon which
the claim is based; however, if the Disability Determination Services
(DDS) cannot redetermine the claim under the Secretary's rules based on
the original evidence of record, the DDS will request the necessary
evidence relevant to the time period being redetermined. In addition, a
class member will be permitted to submit any additional evidence relevant
to the period being redetermined, and such additional, relevant evidence
will be considered by DDS in making the redetermination.
4.
If the redetermination under this Stipulation and Order results in a
finding that the individual was disabled, the claim will be reopened, and
the evidence of the class member's disability from the period of the
previous determination to the present, or to the date of a more recent
allowance, will be evaluated and new determination will be issued.
5.
At the option of SSA, Rosetti claimants with subsequent disability claims
active and simultaneously pending at any administrative level of review at
the time their Rosetti claim is being evaluated may have all claims
consolidated and reviewed simultaneously. SSA will use its best efforts to
ensure that adjudication of the current claims is not delayed by such
consolidation.
6.
SSA will exert its best efforts to resolve all claims of Rosetti class
members as expeditiously as possible. See HALLEX, vol. 1, div. 2, June
1993, I-2-140.C (TERI cases); POMS
DI
E23020.001.
7.
Class members shall retain all rights to seek further administrative and
judicial review of determinations or decisions made on readjudication in
accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 20 C.F.R. Parts 404 and 416
(1993).
3.
SSA will issue instructions to its adjudicators to implement the terms of
this Stipulation. SSA will make a good faith effort to provide counsel for
the plaintiffs with draft instructions within 120 days of the date on
which the District Court enters judgment in this action pursuant to the
terms of this Stipulation. Counsel for plaintiffs will make a good faith
effort to provide SSA with their comments on these instructions within ten
days of counsel's receipt of the instructions. SSA will make a good faith
effort to issue final instructions within 45 days of receiving the
comments from counsel for plaintiffs or, if no comments are received,
within 45 days of the due date for such comments. SSA may, but is not
required to, incorporate plaintiffs' comments into its instructions. SSA
will provide counsel for plaintiffs with a copy of the final instructions
issued to adjudicators and any subsequent revisions to the instructions.
SSA will not review any prior determinations of Rosetti class members
until final instructions have been issued.
4.
Plaintiffs' counsel and defendant's counsel, by their signatures below,
warrant that they are sole counsel to the plaintiffs and to the defendant,
respectively, whose interests were represented in this action and that
they are authorized to stipulate to the resolution of issues in this
action.
5.
The question whether plaintiffs are entitled to any attorney's fees,
expenses, and/or costs, and, if so, the amount of such fees, expenses,
and/or costs shall be determined at a later date by the parties or by the
Court upon timely application by the plaintiffs. Notwithstanding any other
provision of this Stipulation and Order, nothing in this Stipulation and
Order is, or shall be offered or construed as, a finding or evidence of an
admission by any party that the position of the defendant in this action
was or was not substantially justified, nor is this Stipulation and Order
an admission of liability on the part of defendant for the payment of any
attorney's fees, expenses, or costs.
6.
The parties will attempt to resolve any disputes arising under this
Stipulation by negotiation between counsel or their designees. The parties
reserve the right to seek a modification of the Stipulation from the court
in the event of a change in the law.
7.
Individuals in the class shall be barred and enjoined forever from:
A.
prosecuting any claims or causes of action that have been or could be
asserted by reason of, or with respect to, or in connection with, or that
arise out of any of the matters alleged in this action; and
B.
seeking judicial relief that would have the effect, directly or
indirectly, of requiring that the redeterminations herein be reopened,
redetermined, readjudicated, or otherwise reviewed in any manner by
SSA.
Nothing in this Stipulation shall prevent any class member from pursuing
an individual administrative appeal, a request for reopening, or a
judicial appeal, or from asserting that a legal standard was not applied,
or was improperly applied, in his or her individual case.
8.
The defendant, its administrators or successors, and any department,
agency, or establishment of the United States and any officers, employees,
agents, or successors of any such department, agency, or establishment,
are hereby discharged and released from any claims and causes of action
that have been asserted in this action, or administratively, by reason of,
or with respect to, or in connection with, or that arise out of, any
matters alleged in this action; provided, however, that nothing in this
paragraph shall relieve the defendant of the duty to comply with this
Stipulation and Order.
9.
This Stipulation does not constitute an admission by the defendant of any
pattern or practice that violates or fails to comply with any law, rule,
or regulation dealing with any matter within the scope of the allegations
contained in the complaint or otherwise raised by plaintiffs in this
action.
10.
Final judgment in accordance with the terms hereof shall be entered upon
entry of this Stipulation and Order. This Stipulation and the covenants
and conditions contained herein shall become effective upon entry of the
Stipulation and Order as an Order of the Court. The Court will retain
jurisdiction in this action only for the purpose of enforcing this
Stipulation and Order, resolving disputes over whether claimants are
entitled to redeterminations as provided by paragraph 2 of this
Stipulation and Order, determining matters concerning modification of this
Stipulation and Order pursuant to paragraph 6, and determining, upon
timely application by plaintiffs, whether plaintiffs are entitled to
attorney's fees, expenses, and/or costs.
/s/
|
FRANK W. HUNGER |
_________________________ |
|
CATHERINE C. CARR |
Assistant Attorney General |
JAMES M. LAFFERTY |
|
MARIAN C. NOWELL |
MICHAEL R. STILES |
Community Legal Services, Inc. |
United States Attorney |
Law Center South |
|
1226 South Broad Street |
/s/
|
|
_________________________ |
Philadelphia, PA 19146 |
BRIAN G. KENNEDY |
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS |
/s/ |
|
_________________________ |
|
CAROL FEDERIGHI |
|
Department of Justice |
|
Civil Division - Room 1012 |
|
901 E Street, N.W. |
|
Washington, D.C. 20510 |
|
Tel: (202) 514-1903 |
|
|
|
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT |
DATE:
7/5/94
|
DATE: 6/30/94
|
|
|
|
|
SO ORDERED: |
|
DATED:
7/7/94
|
/s/
|
|
_________________________ |
|
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK |
|
United States District Judge |
|
|
|
|
SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICE |
Important information |
________________________________________
From: Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security
Administration
________________________________________
Name |
ROS |
DATE: |
Address |
|
CLAIM NUMBER: |
City, State, Zip |
DOC: |
|
NOTICE: YOU COULD GET SOCIAL SECRUITY BENEFITS: |
READ CAREFULLY! YOU HAVE ONLY 60 DAYS TO RESPOND |
We may owe you disability money. This is because of a court case called
Rosetti v. Shalala.
We denied your old disability claim. You can ask us to look at your old
claim again by sending in the enclosed reply form within 60 days.
IF YOU NOW GET MONEY FROM SOCIAL SECURITY
Even if you now get money from Social Security, we may still owe you more
disability money.
WHAT YOU NEED TO DO IF YOU WANT US TO REVIEW YOUR CLAIM
FILL OUT THE ENCLOSED REPLY FORM AND SEND IT TO US NOW.
YOU HAVE ONLY 60 DAYS TO DO THIS. DO NOT WAIT OR YOU MAY LOSE THE RIGHT TO
HAVE YOUR CLAIM REVIEWED.
WHAT WE WILL DO
If you ask us to look again at your old claim, we will review you case. We
will see if you meet the standards in the Rosetti
court order for a new review of you old claim. Under these standard, you
may be eligible for a review of your old claim if we find that the answer
is “yes” to all of the following questions:
1.
Did you live in Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania or the Virgin Islands
when we denied your claim or ceased your benefits?
2.
Was your claim denied or benefits ceased, in whole or in part, on or after
March 22, 1991, and before July 2, 1993?
3.
Did you have Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) or Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) when we decided your claim?
If you do not meet the requirements, we will send you a letter that
explains why.
If we find that you meet all the standards set out in the court order, we
will give you a new disability decision on your old claim. You can submit
new evidence about what your medical condition was at the time of the old
decision. We will notify you about the new decision.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
If you have any questions, you may call your local Social Security office.
We can answer most questions over the phone. You can also write or visit
any Social Security office. If you call or visit an office, please try to
have this letter with you. It will help us answer your questions. The
address and telephone number of the office that serves your area
are:
You may also call us toll free at 1-800-772-1213 if you have any
questions.
If you already have a lawyer or other legal representative, you may show
the notice to him or her. You do not need a lawyer or legal representative
to send the reply form back to Social Security.
ESTE ES UN AVISO IMPORTANTE RELACIONADO CON BENEFICIOS DE SEGURO SOCIAL
FAVOR DE PEDIR QUE SE LO TRADUZCAN IMMEDATAMENTE Y DE LLAMA A SU OFICINA
DE SEGURO SOCIAL PARA UNA EXPLICACION.
Enclosures
Reply form and envelope
We are writing to tell you that we received your request for us to look at
your past claim for disability benefits. If you are eligible for review,
we will list the standards approved by the Court under the
Rosetti v. Shalala settlement agreement.
We expect to receive many requests for review and it may take several
months before we look at your file. When we start the review, we will
decide if you are a member of the “class” of people included
in the lawsuit.
If you have a legal representative helping you with your claim, you should
contact him or her. You also may ask for legal help by contacting the
lawyers in the Rosetti case. They are:
Rosetti Counsel |
Community Legal Services, Inc. |
1226 S. Broad Street |
Philadelphia, PA 19146 |
Telephone: |
If you have any questions, you may call us toll free at 1-800-772-1218, or
you may contact your local Social Security Office. The address and phone
number of the Social Security Office that serves your area are shown
below.
If you call to visit an office, please have this letter with you. It will
help us answer your questions. Also, if you plan to visit an office, you
may call ahead to make an appointment. This will help us to serve you more
quickly.
ATTACHMENT 2 |
[SSA'S Heading] |
THIS NOTICE IS ABOUT YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CLAIM |
PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY! |
You asked us to review your case under the terms of the Rosetti
v. Shalala settlement agreement. We have looked at your case
and have decided that you are not a Rosetti class member eligible for
relief. This means that we will not review our earlier decision to deny or
cease your benefits. The reason you are not a class member eligible for
relief under the Rosetti settlement agreement is
checked below.
WHY YOU ARE NOT A CLASS MEMBER ELIGIBLE FOR RELIEF |
You are not a Rosetti class member eligible for
relief because:
[ ] You did not reside in Delaware, New Jersey,
Pennsylvania, or the Virgin Islands when your claim was denied or
your benefits ceased.
[ ] You did not receive a final decision denying
your claim or ceasing your benefits, in whole or in part, on or
after March 22, 1991 and before July 2, 1993.
[ ] Your disability claim was not based in
whole or in part on HIV or AIDS.
[ ] Your claim was denied for some reason other
than your medical condition. That reason was
_________________________
.
[ ] You have received a final decision by a
United States District Court in your claim for disability benefits
that would otherwise be covered by this settlement
agreement.
[ ] You have already received all the benefits
you could receive under the Rosetti settlement agreement.
[ ] Other:
______________________________________
ATTACHMENT 3 |
|
WE ARE NOT DECIDING IF YOU ARE DISABLED |
It is important for you to know that we are not making a decision about
whether you are disabled. We are deciding
only that you are not a
Rosetti class member eligible for relief.
IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THIS DETERMINATION |
You must writewithin
60 days of when you receive this
notice to:
Office of General Counsel (OGC) |
Department of Health and Human Services |
600 Altmeyer Building |
6401 Security Boulevard |
Baltimore, MD 21235 |
In addition, you may contact the lawyers representing the
Rosetti class members, who can be reached as
follows:
Rosetti Counsel |
Community Legal Services, Inc. |
1226 S. Broad Street |
Philadelphia, PA 19146 |
Telephone: |
The Rosetti lawyers can advise you and, if
appropriate, assist you in notifying Social Security that you disagree
with the determination.
ESTE ES UN AVISO IMPORTANTE RELACIONADO CON BENEFICIOS DE SEGURO SOCIAL
FAVOR DE PEDIR QUE SELO TRADUZCAN IMMEDIATAMENTE Y DE LLAMAR A SU OFICINA
DE SEGURO SOCIAL PARA UNA EXPLICACTION.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT |
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA |
PETER ROSETTI AND MARY DOE, |
) |
|
on behalf of themselves and |
) |
|
all others similarly situated, |
) |
|
|
) |
|
Plaintiffs,
|
) |
Civil No. 91-3389
|
|
) |
|
v. |
) |
|
|
) |
|
DONNA E. SHALALA, |
) |
|
Secretary of Health and |
) |
|
Human Services, |
) |
|
|
) |
|
Defendant.
|
) |
|
PRIVACY ACT PROTECTIVE ORDER |
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a(b) (11), 42 U.S.C. § 1306(a), and
20 C.F.R. §
401.340, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1.
Defendant may disclose to plaintiffs' counsel information required to be
disclosed to plaintiffs' counsel under the Stipulation and Order executed
by the parties in this case that is subject to restrictions on disclosure
under the Privacy and Social Security Acts without obtaining the prior
written consent of the individual to whom such records pertain, for the
purposes of monitoring compliance with the Stipulation and Order,
facilitating implementation of the Stipulation and Order, and assisting
class members and potential class members in effectuating their rights
under the Stipulation and Order. Such information consists of names,
addresses, and claims files of potential class members, and other
claimant-specific information reasonably relevant to the implementation of
the Stipulation and Order.
2.
Plaintiffs' counsel shall use the information disclosed pursuant to
paragraph 1 of this Order only for the purposes described above. Except as
provided in paragraph 4 of this Order, plaintiffs' counsel shall not make
disclosures of such information except: (1) to each other; (2) to members
of plaintiffs' counsel's staff; (3) to defendants or their agents or their
counsel; (4) to the Court in this action; or (5) to other persons
participating in the accomplishment of the purposes described in paragraph
1. Any disclosure to persons described in item (5) of the preceding
sentence shall be conditioned upon such persons having read this Order and
acknowledged in writing that they understand the Order and agree to be
bound by it. Plaintiffs' counsel shall inform all non-attorney staff in
their offices who have access to information subject to this order of the
requirements of this order and shall instruct them to comply with its
terms. Additionally, plaintiffs' counsel may disclose information
pertaining to particular class members or potential class members to those
particular individuals or to representatives acting on behalf of such
individuals.
3.
Plaintiffs' counsel and members of their staff shall limit the making of
copies of the records disclosed pursuant to paragraph 1 of this Order to
those necessary to the purposes described in paragraph 1. All such copies,
and any documents created by plaintiffs' counsel or any member of their
staff that contain information disclosed pursuant to paragraph 1, shall be
kept confidential, consistent with the Rules of Professional Conduct. All
such copies and documents concerning individuals who do not individually
engage class counsel's assistance shall be returned to the defendant or
destroyed upon the completion of implementation of the Stipulation and
Order.
4.
Nothing in this Order shall prejudice the rights of plaintiffs' counsel to
use the information that they receive pursuant to the Stipulation and
Order in this action that is not subject to restrictions on disclosure
contained in the Privacy and Social Security Acts, or their rights to use
information obtained outside of the context of the Stipulation and
Order.
5.
Failure to comply with this Order shall subject the responsible individual
and/or his or her attorney to appropriate sanctions by the Court,
including a finding of contempt.
6.
This Order does not constitute any agreement or ruling as to the
discoverability or admissibility of any record or information.
7.
Upon twenty days' notice to the other parties, any party may seek
modification of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 7 day of
July, 1994.
|
By: /s/
|
|
_________________________ |
|
RAYMOND J. BRODERICK |
|
United States District Judge |
Approved:
/s/
_________________________
CATHERINE C. CARR
JAMES M. LAFFERTY
MARIAN
C. NOWELLCommunity Legal Services, Inc.
Law Center South
1226
South Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA. 19146
Dated:7/5/94
Attorney for Plaintiffs'
FRANK W. HUNGER
Assistant
Attorney GeneralMICHAEL R. STILES
United States Attorney
/s/
_________________________
BRIAN S. KENNEDY
CAROL FEDERIGHI
Attorneys,
Department of Justice
Civil Division - Room 1012
901
E Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20530
Tel: (202)
514-1903
Dated:6/30/94
Attorneys for Defendant
The terms “finally” and “final,” as used herein,
refer to the date of the administrative decision that became the binding
decision of the Secretary pursuant to
20 C.F.R.
§§404.905,
404.921, 404.955,
404.972, 404.981, 416.1405, 416.1421, 416.1455, 416.1472 and 415.1481, and
do not mean that a class member must have exhausted administrative
remedies under sections 205(g) and (h) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. §405(g) and (h).
Attachment 2. ROSETTI COURT CASE FLAG/ALERT
REVIEW OFFICE |
PSC |
MFT |
DOC |
ALERT DATE |
FOLDER LOCATION INFORMATION |
|
|
TITLE |
CFL |
CFL DATE |
ACN |
PAYEE ADDRESS |
|
SCREENING OFFICE ADDRESS: |
|
|
|
|
|
Title II and CON Claims |
Title XVI |
|
|
|
|
SSA, ODIO |
Northeastern PSC or |
|
|
Mid-Atlantic PSC |
|
Class Action
Section P.O. Box 17369 Baltimore, Maryland
21235-0050
|
|
|
ATTN: Rosetti Screening Unit |
ATTN: Rosetti Coordinator |
|
|
|
|
IF CLAIM IS PENDING IN OHA, THEN SHIP FOLDER TO: |
|
|
|
|
Office
of Hearings and Appeals Office of Appellate Operations
(OAO) One
Skyline Tower, Suite 701 5107 Leesburg Pike Falls
Church, VA 22041-3200
|
|
|
ATTN: OAO Class Action Coordinator |
|
|
|
|
|
(Case locator code 5007) |
|
Attachment 3. Route Slip or Case Flag for Screening
Rosetti Class Action Case
SCREENING NECESSARY
Claimant's name: |
___________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSN: |
___________________________ |
|
|
This claimant may be a Rosetti class member. The
attached folder location information indicates that a current claim file
is pending in your office. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached
alert [and prior claim file(s)] for association, screening for class
membership, consolidation consideration and possible readjudication.
Please refer to HALLEX Temporary
Instruction 5-4-44 for additional information and instructions.
|
TO: |
__________________________________
__________________________________
__________________________________
__________________________________
|
CLASS ACTION CODE: R R
|
1. CLAIMANT'S SSN
___ ___ ___ - ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ ___
|
2. CLAIMANT'S NAME (Last, First)
|
3. DATE OF BIRTH
___ ___ - ___ ___ - ___ ___
|
4. CLAIM NUMBER
___ ___ ____ - ___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ ___ - ___ ___
(BIC/ID)
|
5. SCREENING DATE
___ - ___ - ___
|
a. SCREENING RESULT
____MEMBER (J) ____NONMEMBER (F)
|
b. SCREENOUT CODE
___ ___(see item 13 for screenout codes)
|
6. Was a less than fully favorable title II or title XVIdetermination/decision issued on any claim(s) at any administrative level while the claimant was a resident of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania or the Virgin Islands?
|
Yes___No___
(if No go to 13)
|
7. Was the less than fully favorable determination/decision(s) referred to in Question 6 issued at any administrative level on or after March 22, 1991 and before July 2, 1993, and did this become the final decision of the Secretary?
(Note: Although not the “final decision of the Secretary,” an Appeals Council denial of a request for review is the last action of the Secretary, and the date of such a denial controls for class membership screening purposes.)
|
Yes___No___
(if No go to 13)
|
8.Did the determination/decision(s) referred to in Question 6 involve an allegation or diagnosis of HIV infection or AIDS?
|
Yes___No___
(if No go to 13)
|
9. Were all determination/decision(s) issued on the potential Rosetti claim(s) based on some reason other than the individual's medical condition (e.g., SGA)?
|
Yes___No___
(if No go to 13)
|
10.Did the individual receive a subsequent fully favorable determination/decision which established entitlement to and paid benefits commencing with the earliest possible month based on the earliest potential Rosetti claim(s)?
|
Yes___No___
(if No go to 13)
|
11.Did the individual receive a final decision/determination, on the merits, on or after July 2, 1993, which covered the entire period at issue in the earliest potential Rosetti claim?
|
Yes___No___
(if No go to 13)
|
12.Did the individual receive a final decision from a federal district or appellate court based on an administrative denial/determination decision on a potential Rosetti claim(s) issued on or after March 22, 1991 and before July 2, 1993?
|
Yes___No___
(If Yes, go to 13. If No, claimant is a class member entitled to relief. Check member block in item 5.a.)
|
13. The claimant is not a Rosetti class member eligible for relief. Check the nonmember block in item 5.a. and enter the screenout code in item 5.b. as follows:
Enter
06 if question 6 was answered "NO". Enter 07 if question
7 was answered "NO". Enter 08 if question 8 was answered
"NO". Enter 09 if question 9 was answered "YES". Enter
10 if question 10 was answered "YES". Enter 11 if question
11 was answered "YES". Enter 12 if question 12 was answered
"YES".
|
No other screenout code entry is appropriate.
|
14. On the lines below, please enter the date(s) of all applications and final decisions considered in the screening process and indicate the administrative level at which the final decision was made (i.e., DDS, ALJ, AC).
Date of Application(s) Date of Decisions Level of Final Decision
_______________ __________________ ________________
_______________ __________________ ________________
_______________ __________________ ________________
|
15. IDENTIFICATION OF SCREENER |
COMPONENT
|
DATE
|
|
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING ROSETTI SCREENING SHEET |
Items 1 - 4
You must consider all applications decided during the period covered by
the court order when making the class membership determination. A SEPARATE
SCREENING SHEET MUST BE PREPARED FOR EACH DIFFERENT CLAIM NUMBER. Multiple
applications during the period covered by the court order on the same
claim number should be screened on the same screening sheet.
Fill in the identifying information as requested. Make sure the Claim
Number, BIC/ID and SSN, if different from the claim number are correct and
legible. (If SSN is different from claim number, copy SSN from BOAN/PAN
field on alert).
Item 5
Complete this information last. Do not fill in the member/nonmember
information in Item 5 until the screening process is completed.
Questions and Items 6-15 -- General
a.
In a multiple claims case, begin screening with the earliest claim in the
Rosetti period and stop with the last claim in the
Rosetti period. Remember, a separate screening
sheet must be completed for each different claim number. Multiple claims
covered by the court order under the same claim number should be screened
on the same screening sheet.
b.
To answer the questions in DDS cases, use the SSA-831 for denial cases and
SSA-832/833 for cessation cases. In OHA adjudicated cases, read the ALJ/AC
decision to answer the questions.
c.
If the SSA-831/832/833 or OHA decision does not yield enough information
to answer the questions, look further into the file.
d.
If the claim folder(s) cannot be located, but queries establish that the
determination(s)/decision(s) was made outside the
Rosetti timeframe, that the claim was denied for a
nonmedical reason or that the claimant did not reside in Delaware, New
Jersey, Pennsylvania or the Virgin Islands, screen out the claim(s)
without reconstructing the lost folder(s). (See
DI
42565.010B.5.c. for more information).
e.
If questions 6-8 are answered “NO,” or questions 9-12 are
answered “YES,” check the nonmember block found in item 5.a.
on the screening sheet, then enter the appropriate screenout code in Item
5.b. as directed in question 13 on the screening sheet.
f.
Remember to follow instructions for members/nonmembers.
Question 6
Screen for residency as of the date of the final determination/decision,
not date of application. (See Question 7 for more information.) If the
claimant was not a resident of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania or the
Virgin Islands as of the date of the final decision, the claimant is not a
class member eligible for relief under the Rosetti
settlement.
Question 7
Screen for date of decision, not date of application. Individuals are
potentially entitled to relief if they received a denial or less than
fully favorable decision (e.g., later onset, closed period) between March
22, 1991, and July 1, 1993, inclusive, which became the final decision of
the Secretary.
Question 8
Review Items 16a/b of the SSA-831 and Items 22/21 of the SSA-832/833. If
diagnosis code 0420, 0430, or 0440 is present, indicate “YES”
for Question 8 and go to the next question. If none of these codes are
present, also review the disability interview form for an allegation of
HIV infection, including AIDS. Look at Item D, page 1 of the SSA-3368-BK;
Item 3a of the SSA-3820-F6; or Item 1a and 1c of the SSA-454-BK, or the
OHA decision as applicable. If these items indicate that HIV infection or
AIDS has been alleged, indicate “YES” for Question 8 and go
to the next question.
Question 9
Check item 33 of the SSA-831 or item 11 of the SSA-832/833. The reg-basis
codes that indicate a non-medical initial or post-adjudicative denial for
title II are L1, L2, M7, M8, N1, N2 or S1. N01, N02, N03, N04, N05, N06,
N09, N10, N11, N12, N13, N14, N17, N33, N44 (for adult claimants only) and
N54, are the non-medical initial or post-adjudicative denial codes for
title XVI. For a complete list of the title II denial codes see
SM 00380.270. For
a complete list of title XVI denial or payment status codes see
SM 01005.440 and
SM
01305.001F.
Question 10
Review the file and case control queries. Determine if a subsequent
reversal was fully favorable, allowing the earliest possible
entitlement/onset date as alleged on the Rosetti
claim(s). In order for an individual to be screened out under this
question, benefits must have been paid based on the earliest date of
entitlement/eligibility. (If full retroactive benefits have not been paid,
see DI
42565.010.C.6. for specific routing instructions).
Question 11
Review all claims files and queries to determine whether decision(s) made
on or after July 2, 1993 readjudicated the merits of the entire period
covered by the Rosetti claim(s).
Per POMS DI
27510.001A and
DI
27510.005A.1.a., DDS adjudicators generally limit consideration of
subsequent claims to the period after the previously adjudicated period.
Therefore, a claim cannot be screened out on the basis of Question 11
unless it is clear that the DDS adjudicated the entire period covered by
the Rosetti claim back to the earliest alleged
onset/entitlement date. At the OHA level, ALJ and Appeals Council
decisions that do not consider the previously adjudicated period usually
will indicate that the claimant's request for hearing has been dismissed
on the basis of res judicata with respect to the previously adjudicated
period. These cases cannot be screened out.
Question 12
Screen to determine if a district or appellate court issued a final, i.e.,
unappealed, decision on the Rosetti
application(s).
The period within which an appeal of a district court decision may be
filed is 60 days from the date of entry of judgment. For example, a
district court decision entered on October 2, 1991, became unappealable on
December 2, 1991, the 61st day after entry of judgment if no appeal was
filed. Consult the Office of the General Counsel, as needed.
Item 13
Self-explanatory
Item 14
Fill in the dates of the application(s), decision(s) and the level of
adjudication of the final decision(s), that were reviewed in deciding
class membership for the claim number in item 4. Remember a separate
screening sheet must be prepared for each different claim number.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR MEMBERS
a.
Check the “MEMBER” block in item 5.a. of the screening
sheet.
b.
Sign the form and retain the original screening sheet in the claim
folder.
c.
OHA Headquarters components will send a copy of the screening sheet
to:
Office of Appellate Operations
One Skyline Tower,
Suite 701
Attn: OAO Class Action Coordinator[The Class Action Coordinator will enter the screening sheet information
from the screening sheet into a data base and forward the screening sheet
to the Division of Litigation Analysis and Implementation (DLAI).]
OHA Hearing Office (HO) components will send a copy of the screening sheet
to:
Office of Hearings and Appeals
Division of Litigation
Analysis and Implementation
One Skyline Tower, Suite 702
Falls
Church, VA 22041-3255ATTN: RosettiCoordinator[DLAI will retain a copy of each screening sheet received from the OAO
Class Action Coordinator or an HO and forward a copy to Litigation Staff
at SSA Headquarters for entry into the Civil Action Tracking
System.]
INSTRUCTIONS FOR NONMEMBERS
a.
Check the “NONMEMBER” block in item 5.a. and enter the
appropriate screenout code (the number of the question that determined the
individual is not a class member, numbers 6-12, see Item 13 on the
screening sheet) in item 5.b.
b.
Follow items b. and c. above.
c.
Prepare and send the class membership denial letter (Attachment 6) to the
claimant with a copy to his/her representative, if any, and class counsel.
Retain a copy of the denial letter in the folder. Forward the claim
file(s) as indicated in HALLEX I-5-444,
Part V.B.3.a.
Attachment 5. Route Slip for Routing Class Member Alerts and Prior Claim File(s)
to ODIO or PSC - OHA No Longer Has Current Claim
ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP |
|
DATE |
TO:
1.
|
Initials |
Date |
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
|
|
__XX_ACTION |
_____FILE |
_____NOTE AND RETURN |
_____APPROVAL |
_____FOR CLEARANCE |
_____PER CONVERSATION |
_____AS REQUESTED |
_____FOR CORRECTION |
_____PREPARE REPLY |
_____CIRCULATE |
_____FOR YOUR INFORMATION |
_____SEE ME |
_____COMMENT |
_____INVESTIGATE |
_____SIGNATURE |
_____COORDINATION |
_____JUSTIFY |
_____ |
REMARKS
Claimant: |
___________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSN: |
___________________________ |
|
|
OHA received the attached alert [and prior claim file(s)] for screening
and no longer has the current claim file. Our records show that you now
have possession of the current claim. Accordingly, we are forwarding the
alert and any accompanying prior claim file(s) for association with the
current claim. After associating the alert with the current claim, please
forward to ODIO, the NEPSC or MATPSC (using the address indicated on the
alert) for screening and possible readjudication.
SEE POMS DI 12565.005 OR DI 42565.005
Attachment
DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals,
clearances, and similar actions.
FROM:
Office of Hearings and Appeals
|
SUITE / BUILDING
|
|
PHONE NUMBER
_______________
|
OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76)
*U.S.GPO:1985-0-461-274/20020
Prescribed by GSA
FPMR
(41 CFR) 101-11.206
|
Attachment 6. Notice of Non-Class Membership/Ineligibility for Relief
SOCIAL
SECURITY
NOTICE
Important Information
From: |
Department of Health and Human Services Social Security Administration
|
|
|
|
____________________________Date:____-____-____ |
|
|
|
____________________________Claim Number:____________________ |
|
|
|
____________________________DOC___________________________ |
THIS NOTICE IS ABOUT YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY CLAIM. |
PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY! |
You asked us to review your case under the terms of the Rosetti
v. Shalala settlement agreement. We have looked at your case
and decided that you are not a Rosetti class member
eligible for relief. This means that we will not review our earlier
decision to deny or cease your benefits. The reason you are not a class
member eligible for relief under the Rosetti
settlement agreement is checked below.
WHY YOU ARE NOT A CLASS MEMBER ELIGIBLE FOR RELIEF |
You are not a Rosetti class member eligible for
relief because:
___ |
You did not reside in Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, or the Virgin Islands when your claim was denied or your benefits ceased.
|
___ |
You did not receive a final decision denying your claim or ceasing your benefits, in whole or in part, on or after March 22, 1991, and before July 2, 1993.
|
___ |
Your disability claim was not based in whole or in part on HIV or AIDS.
|
___ |
Your claim was denied for some reason other than your medical condition. That reason was
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________.
|
___ |
You have already received all the benefits you could receive under the Rosetti settlement agreement.
|
___ |
You received a final decision by a United States District Court in your claim for disability benefits that would otherwise be covered by this settlement agreement.
|
___ |
We made a decision on or after July 2, 1993, which covered the entire time period of at issue in your Rosetti claim.
|
___ |
Other:__________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
|
|
|
WE ARE NOT DECIDING IF YOU ARE DISABLED |
It is important for you to know that we are not making a decision about
whether you are currently disabled. We are deciding only that you are not
a Rosetti class member eligible for relief.
IF YOU DISAGREE WITH THIS DETERMINATION |
You must write within 60 days of when you receive this notice to:
Office of the General
Counsel (OGC) Department of Health and Human Services 600
Altmeyer Building 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore,
MD 21235
|
Class Counsel
|
In addition, you may contact the lawyers representing the
Rosetti class members, who can be reached as
follows:
Rosetti Counsel |
Community Legal Services, Inc. |
1424 Chestnut Street |
Philadelphia, PA 19102 |
Telephone: 1-800-889-4369 or |
(215) 981-3750 |
The Rosetti lawyers can advise you and, if
appropriate, assist you in notifying Social Security that you disagree
with this determination.
ESTE ES UN AVISO IMPORTANTE RELACIONADO CON BENEFICIOS DE SEGURO SOCIAL.
FAVOR DE PEDIR QUE SE LO TRADUZCAN IMMEDIATAMENTE Y DE LLAMAR A SU
OFFICINA DE SEGURO SOCIAL PARA UNA EXPLICACION.
Attachment 7. Route Slip for Non-class Members/Ineligibility for Relief
Cases
ROUTING AND TRANSMITTAL SLIP |
|
DATE |
TO:
1. MATPSC
|
Initials |
Date |
2. 300 Spring Garden Street |
|
|
3. Philadelphia, PA 19123 |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
|
|
__XX_ACTION |
_____FILE |
_____NOTE AND RETURN |
_____APPROVAL |
_____FOR CLEARANCE |
_____PER CONVERSATION |
_____AS REQUESTED |
_____FOR CORRECTION |
_____PREPARE REPLY |
_____CIRCULATE |
_____FOR YOUR INFORMATION |
_____SEE ME |
_____COMMENT |
_____INVESTIGATE |
_____SIGNATURE |
_____COORDINATION |
_____JUSTIFY |
_____ |
REMARKS
Claimant: |
___________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSN: |
___________________________ |
|
|
We have determined that this claimant is not a
Rosetti class member entitled to relief. (See
screening sheet and copy of notice of non-class membership/ineligibility
for relief in the attached claim file(s).) We are forwarding this file to
your office because the claimant disputes the non-class membership
determination and class counsel has asked to review the file.
SEE POMS DI 12565.005
Attachment
DO NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals,
clearances, and similar actions.
FROM:
Office of Hearings and Appeals
|
SUITE / BUILDING
|
|
PHONE NUMBER
_______________
|
OPTIONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76)
*U.S.GPO:1985-0-461-274/20020
Prescribed by GSA
FPMR
(41 CFR) 101-11.206
|
Attachment 8. Text for Notice of Revised Class Membership/Eligibility for Relief
Determination
In an earlier letter that we sent you, we said that you were not a class
member eligible for relief under the Rosetti v.
Shalala class action. After reviewing all of the facts, we
have decided that you are a Rosetti class member
eligible for relief. Therefore, we will review your claim using the
standards approved by the court under the Rosetti v.
Shalala settlement agreement.
We have received many requests for review and it may take several months
before we look at your claim file.
If you think that you are disabled now, you should fill out a new
application at any Social Security office.
If you have any questions, you may call us toll-free at 1-800-772-1213, or
call your local Social Security office at XXX-XXXX. We can answer most
questions over the phone. You can also write or visit any Social Security
office. The office that serves your area is located at:
District Office
Address
City, ST ZIP
If you do call or visit an office, please have this letter with you. It
will help us answer your questions. Also, if you plan to visit an office,
you may call ahead to make an appointment. This will help us serve you
more quickly.
If you have someone helping you with your claim, you should contact him or
her. You may also ask for legal help by contacting a legal aid
organization in your area.
Attachment 9. Rosetti Class Member Flag for Headquarters Use (DDS Readjudication
- Retention Period Expired)
Rosetti Class Action Case
READJUDICATION NECESSARY
Claimant's name: |
___________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSN: |
___________________________ |
|
|
This claimant is a Rosetti class member.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached claim file(s) to the DDS for
readjudication.
[ Send folders to the appropriate DDS.]
Attachment 10. Rosetti Class Member Flag for Headquarters Use (DDS Readjudication
- Retention Period Has Not Expired)
Rosetti Class Action Case
READJUDICATION NECESSARY
Claimant's name: |
___________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSN: |
___________________________ |
|
|
This claimant is a Rosetti class member. After
expiration of the retention period, forward claim file(s) to the DDS for
readjudication.
[Send folders to the appropriate DDS.]
If the claimant has filed a civil action and elected to remain in court
for review of the current claim, forward the
Rosetti claim file(s) without delay to the
appropriate DDS for readjudication.
DEPARTMENT OF |
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES |
Social Security Administration |
OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS |
|
ORDER OF DISMISSAL |
|
|
IN THE CASE OF |
CLAIM FOR |
__________________________ |
___________________________ |
|
|
__________________________ |
___________________________ |
This case is before the Administrative Law Judge pursuant to a request for
hearing filed on
_________________
with respect to the application(s) filed on
_________________.
In accordance with the Joint Stipulation of the parties and an order of
the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
in the case of Rosetti v. Shalala, No. 91-3389
(E.D. Pa. July 7, 1994), the claimant has requested readjudication of the
final (determination/decision) on the prior application(s) filed on
______________.
The claimant has been identified as a Rosetti class
member and is entitled to have the final administrative denial of the
prior application(s) reviewed under the terms of the Stipulation and
Order. Because the claimant's current claim shares certain issues in
common with the prior claim, the undersigned hereby dismisses without
prejudice the request for hearing.
The claimant's current application(s) will be associated with the prior
claim(s) and forwarded to [identify the appropriate DDS by name]
Disability Determination Service which will conduct the
Rosetti readjudication.
The Disability Determination Service will notify the claimant of its new
determination and of the claimant's right to file a new request for
hearing.
|
|
_____________________________
Administrative
Law Judge
|
|
|
_____________________________
Date
|
Attachment 12. Notice Transmitting ALJ Order of Dismissal
Claimant's Name
Address
City, State Zip
Enclosed is an order of the Administrative Law Judge dismissing your
request for hearing and returning your case to the [identify the
appropriate DDS by name] Disability Determination Service which makes
disability determinations for the Social Security Administration. Please
read this notice and Order of Dismissal carefully.
What This Order Means
The Administrative Law Judge has sent your current claim and your
Rosetti class member claim back to the [identify
the appropriate DDS by name] Disability Determination Service for further
processing. The enclosed order explains why.
The Next Action on Your Claim
The [identify the appropriate DDS by name] Disability Determination
Service will contact you to tell you what you need to do. If you do not
hear from the [identify the appropriate DDS by name] Disability
Determination Service within 30 days, contact your local Social Security
office.
Do You Have Any Questions?
If you have any questions, contact your local Social Security office. If
you visit your local Social Security office, please bring this notice and
the Administrative Law Judge's order with you.
Enclosure
cc:
(Name and address of representative,
if any)
(Social Security Office (City,
State))
Attachment 13. Rosetti Class Member Flag for HO Use (DDS Readjudication)
Rosetti Class Action Case
READJUDICATION NECESSARY
Claimant's Name: |
___________________________ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SSN: |
___________________________ |
|
|
This claimant is a Rosetti class member. The
attached Rosetti claim file was forwarded to this
hearing office for possible consolidation with a current claim.
|
_______ The Administrative Law Judge has determined that the prior and current claims do not share a common issue and, therefore, should not be consolidated. |
|
_____ The claims have not been consolidated because [(state reason(s))]______________________________________________________
|
|
___________________________________________________________. |
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached alert and prior claim file(s)
to your location for any necessary Rosetti
readjudication action.
We are sending the alert and prior file(s) to:
|
__________________________________
__________________________________
__________________________________
__________________________________
(Destination
code: ___)
|