Under 20
CFR 404.992 and 416.1492, the Appeals Council
(AC) must give the claimant notice that it intends to reopen and
revise a prior determination or decision, unless the proposed revision
is fully favorable to the claimant.
Additionally, when the AC proposes to revise a prior decision
based on additional evidence, the AC must offer the claimant the
opportunity for a hearing. If the claimant requests a hearing, the
AC will remand the case to an administrative law judge (ALJ) to
conduct a hearing on the issue. However, if the claimant waives
the right to a hearing, the AC may proceed with its proposed action.
In a title XVI claim where the claimant
is in payment status, it is irrelevant whether the AC is proposing
a revision based on additional evidence. In accordance with the
decision in Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254,
90 S.Ct. 1011, 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970), the AC will give notice of
a proposed revision when the revision is not fully favorable and
offer the claimant the right to request a hearing. See 20 CFR 416.1336.