ISSUED: May 5, 1995
I. Purpose
This Temporary Instruction (TI) sets forth procedures for implementing the 
parties' December 1, 1993 partial consent judgment that was approved by 
the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri on 
December 16, 1993, in Medellin v. Shalala.
Adjudicators throughout the country must be familiar with this TI because 
class members who now reside outside of the State of Missouri must have 
their cases processed in accordance with the requirements of the 
Medellin consent judgment.
II. Background
On September 10, 1990, plaintiffs filed a statewide class action in 
Missouri challenging the Secretary's loan policy that restricted the 
definition of “loan” in 
20 CFR § 
416.1103(f) to transactions that involved an exchange of money and 
resulted in treating advances of food or shelter as income for 
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) purposes.
On December 16, 1991, following adverse decisions in the Fifth and Ninth 
Circuits in Hickman v. Bowen, 803 F.2d 1377 (5th 
Cir. 1986) and Ceguerra v. Secretary, 933 F.2d 735 
(9th Cir. 1991), SSA announced a policy reinterpretation, through teletype 
instruction IT-67-91, effective December 17, 1991, that permitted bona 
fide loans of food or shelter to be treated in the same manner as cash 
loans (i.e., disregarded) when computing SSI eligibility and benefit 
amounts (Attachment 1). IT-67-91 noted the applicability of the one-year 
timeframe for reopening prior determinations or decisions based on this 
change of position.
On June 10, 1992, the district court certified a class in 
Medellin consisting of: 1) all SSI applicants or 
recipients who resided in Missouri at the time their SSI applications were 
denied, or at the time their SSI benefits were reduced or terminated, 
between July 12, 1990, and December 31, 1991, because the Secretary 
counted as income in-kind support and maintenance (IKSM) that the 
applicant or recipient was obligated to repay under a loan agreement; and, 
2) all SSI applicants and recipients who resided in Missouri during the 
period July 12, 1990, to September 10, 1990, and were either appealing or 
could have appealed a determination or decision that resulted in or upheld 
a denial, reduction or termination of SSI benefits that occurred because 
the Secretary counted as income IKSM that the applicant or recipient was 
obligated to repay under a loan agreement while a resident of Missouri. 
On September 8, 1992, SSA published 
Social Security Ruling (SSR) 
92-8p to provide a uniform national policy interpretation on the 
treatment of advances of IKSM and to further implement the December 1991 
policy change.
On December 18, 1992, the district court issued an order granting 
plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and revising its class 
certification order to address the effect of the Secretary's policy change 
on the merits of potential class member claims. The court found that the 
Secretary's former loan policy was invalid but that the Secretary's change 
in position had rendered plaintiffs' action moot with respect to inclusion 
of those individuals who had “pending or available administrative 
claims” as of December 16, 1991. However, the court also found that 
those individuals with “lapsed claims,” i.e., those 
individuals whose SSI benefits had been denied, reduced or terminated and 
who failed to exhaust fully the available administrative remedies and/or 
seek judicial review prior to December 16, 1991, were improperly excluded 
from the class because they would be unable to benefit from the 
Secretary's change in policy. Thus, the court modified the class 
definition set forth in its order of June 10, 1992, concluding that waiver 
of exhaustion of administrative remedies was appropriate regardless of 
whether the individual had presented a timely § 405(g) action. The 
court concluded that November 10, 1986, the date on which the Fifth 
Circuit invalidated the Secretary's former loan policy in 
Hickman, was a reasonable opening date for the 
class because the Hickman decision should have put 
the Secretary on notice that the validity of its former policy was in 
question.
On February 11, 1993, the court denied the Secretary's motion to alter or 
amend the order of December 18, 1992. The Secretary filed a timely notice 
of appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 
with respect to the inclusion of “lapsed claims” in the class 
definition but did not appeal the inclusion of live claims. The merits of 
plaintiffs' complaint was no longer at issue because of the Secretary's 
December 1991 change of position. The parties signed a partial consent 
judgment on December 1, 1993, for the purpose of proceeding with 
implementation of relief for those individuals with live claims. 
 On December 16, 1993, the district court approved the parties' partial 
consent judgment (Attachment 2). The partial consent judgment requires 
that the Secretary apply the new loan policy to all individuals who meet 
the class definition set forth in the district court's June 10, 1992 
order; however, individuals with “lapsed claims,” i.e., those 
individuals who failed to fully exhaust the available administrative 
remedies and/or seek judicial review between November 11, 1986, and July 
11, 1990, who were added to the class by the district court's order of 
December 18, 1992, were excluded from relief under the partial consent 
judgment.
On April 28, 1994, the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's order 
of December 18, 1992, with respect to inclusion of individuals with lapsed 
claims in the Medellin class. By this action, the 
partial consent judgment became descriptive of the full scope of relief 
available in the Medellin class action.
III. Guiding Principles
Under Medellin, the Secretary will make a new 
eligibility determination for persons who: 1) respond to notice informing 
them of the opportunity for review; and 2) are determined to be class 
members under the partial consent judgment after screening (see 
Part V. 
(Preadjudication Actions) below). The 
Mid-America Program Service Center (MAMPSC) or the SSA field office (FO) 
(i.e., district office or branch office) servicing the claimant's 
residence, as appropriate, will screen cases to determine class 
membership.
The FO will make a new eligibility determination at the reconsideration 
level regardless of the final level at which the case was previously 
decided. Individuals who receive adverse determinations will have full 
appeal rights (i.e., Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing, Appeals 
Council and judicial review). Generally, the partial consent judgment does 
not require any change in OHA's adjudicatory policies because, since 
December 16, 1991, OHA adjudicators have been excluding bona fide loans 
based on advances of food or shelter in computing SSI eligibility and 
benefit amounts. However, under the partial consent judgment, the 
Secretary will recognize and accept as determinative and final any prior 
decision of the Secretary at any administrative level that there did exist 
a bona fide loan based on the advance of food or shelter and honor that 
determination without further inquiry.
IV. Definition of the Medellin Class
Except as noted below, for purposes of implementing the December 16, 1993 
partial consent judgment, Medellin class members 
include all SSI applicants and recipients who, between July 12, 1990, and 
December 31, 1991, inclusive, resided in Missouri and received a 
determination or decision at any administrative level (initial, 
reconsideration, ALJ hearing or Appeals Council review) that denied their 
SSI applications or reduced or terminated their SSI benefits because SSA 
counted as income IKSM that the applicant or recipient was obligated to 
repay under a loan agreement. Medellin class 
members also include all past or present residents of Missouri who, 
between July 12, 1990, and September 10, 1990, inclusive, were appealing 
or could have appealed a determination or decision that resulted in or 
upheld a denial, reduction or termination of SSI benefits that occurred 
because SSA counted as income IKSM that the applicant or recipient was 
obligated to repay under a loan agreement while a resident of Missouri. 
A person is not a class member under the partial consent judgment in 
Medellin if 
 (1) the individual is a former resident of Missouri and received a 
determination or decision between July 12, 1990, and December 31, 1991, 
inclusive, but the individual was not a resident of Missouri at the time 
the determination or decision was issued; or 
(2) the individual's income (after excluding bona fide loans of food or 
shelter) or resources preclude SSI eligibility or additional 
payment.
Class membership is not precluded by a prior decision that became final 
prior to the class timeframe and reduced an individual's SSI benefits 
based on the receipt of IKSM even though the individual alleged that the 
support was made pursuant to a loan of food or shelter. Subsequent 
applications decided within the class timeframe would still be subject to 
relief consideration.
 V. Preadjudication Actions
On March 30, 1994, SSA began sending notices to all potential class 
members in Medellin as identified by computer run. 
The notice included a reply form and a postage-paid return envelope 
addressed to the MAMPSC. Individuals had/have 60 days from the date of 
receipt of the notice to contact SSA by completing and returning the reply 
form, by telephone, in writing or in person to request that SSA 
readjudicate their claims under the terms of the partial consent judgment. 
Receipt of notice is presumed to have occurred 5 days after the date on 
the notice, unless the individual can show it was not received within the 
5-day period.
All untimely responses are sent to the respondent's servicing FO to 
develop good cause for the untimely response. Good cause determinations 
are based on the standards in 
20 CFR § 
416.1411 and SSR 
91-5p. If good cause is not established, the field office sends the 
appropriate notice.
 B. Identifying Medellin Class Members Entitled 
to Relief
1. MAMPSC Responsibilities
Upon receipt of a reply form, MAMPSC obtained an SSID query for the 
respondent. MAMPSC did not routinely obtain the claim folder. MAMPSC 
attempted to telephone each respondent, briefly explain the 
Medellin case and ask each respondent if he or she 
considered the food or shelter received to be the basis for a loan. If the 
respondent did not allege a loan, MAMPSC documented the allegation on a 
report of contact and issued a notice (see 
Part V. B. 3. below) advising the 
respondent that he or she is not a class member under the 
Medellin court case. MAMPSC forwarded the case 
information and a copy of the notice to the servicing FO.
If a respondent alleged a loan based on an advance of food or shelter, or 
if a questionable situation arose, MAMPSC advised the respondent that the 
local FO would contact him or her for further information. MAMPSC 
documented the discussion on a report of contact and forwarded the case 
information to the servicing FO for further development.
If MAMPSC was unable to contact a respondent by telephone, it forwarded 
the case information to the servicing FO for further action.
MAMPSC's involvement in implementation concluded in 1994 after screening 
and processing most of the original responses. Any remaining responder 
case are being handled by the servicing FO.
 
The FO initiates contact with a respondent to explain the 
Medellin partial consent judgment, and asks each 
respondent if he or she considers the food or shelter received to be the 
basis for a loan, when:
- • - MAMPSC is unable to contact a respondent by telephone; 
- • - a reply form is returned to the FO rather than to MAMPSC; or 
- • - an individual not previously sent a Medellin notice 
contacts the FO to inquire about potential relief. 
The FO contacts a respondent to develop for good cause when a reply is 
made more than 70 days after the date of the 
Medellin notice. The FO screens the cases of 
Medellin respondents to eliminate cases from loan 
development in which the claimant is deceased and there is no identifiable 
survivor who could be eligible to receive an SSI underpayment.
  
3. Notice to Non-Class Members
MAMPSC or the FO sends the appropriate notice (Attachments 3 - 5), 
modified to fit the circumstances of the case, to any individual who is 
not a class member under the Medellin partial 
consent judgment because the individual:
- • - does not allege an advance of food or shelter as the basis for a loan 
(Attachment 3 or 4); 
- • - has income (after excluding bona fide loans based on advances of food or 
shelter) or resources that preclude SSI eligibility or additional payment 
(Attachment 3 or 4); 
- • - was not a past or present resident of the State of Missouri who received a 
determination or decision at any administrative level that was issued 
between July 12, 1990, and December 31, 1991, inclusive (Attachment 3 or 
4); 
- • - is deceased and there is no survivor who is eligible to receive an SSI 
underpayment (Attachment 5). 
An individual who wishes to challenge a determination that he or she is 
not eligible for Medellin relief for any reason 
other than he or she is not a survivor eligible to receive an underpayment 
may do so only through class counsel, as explained in the notice 
(Attachments 3 - 4). An individual who wishes to challenge a determination 
that he or she is not a survivor eligible to receive an underpayment 
receives an initial determination with the right to request 
reconsideration (Attachment 5).
   VI. Processing and Adjudication of Medellin 
Claims
A. FO Adjudication of Medellin Claims
The FO will conduct the first Medellin review. The 
new eligibility determination made by the FO will be a redetermination at 
the reconsideration level, regardless of the administrative level at which 
the Medellin claim(s) was previously decided, with 
full appeal rights (i.e., ALJ hearing, Appeals Council and judicial 
review). Prior determinations or decisions which had counted as income 
advances of food or shelter received under a bona fide loan will be 
reopened and revised, as appropriate.
If the FO determines that a claimant received food or shelter under a bona 
fide loan agreement, the FO will recompute the claimant's SSI benefits for 
any month(s) in the retroactive period in which the claimant was charged 
IKSM, calculate the amount of the underpayment, if any, make systems input 
and issue the appropriate notice advising the claimant regarding any 
change in payment and of his or her further appeal rights (Attachments 6 - 
7).
If the FO determines that the food or shelter a claimant received was not 
received pursuant to a bona fide loan agreement, the FO will issue a 
notice advising the claimant of this determination and of his or her 
further appeal rights (Attachments 8 - 9).
 B. OHA Adjudication of Medellin Claims
The following instruction applies to Medellin 
readjudication cases in which the claimant requests a hearing or Appeals 
Council review. OHA should not receive 
any unadjudicated Medellin claims for possible 
consolidation with a current claim pending in OHA because the claims 
generally will not have common issues. Except as otherwise noted in this 
instruction, hearing offices and OHA Headquarters will process 
Medellin cases according to all other current 
practices and procedures including critical case procedures (see 
HALLEX HA 01210.040 and HA 01310.005), 
coding, scheduling, developing evidence, routing, etc.
Adjudication of Medellin claims does not take 
priority over processing critical cases. The 
Medellin workload should not slow down the 
processing of such claims.
 1. Type of Review and Period to Be Considered
The type of review to be conducted is a redetermination. For initial SSI 
claims and appeals of determinations on initial claims, adjudicators will 
apply the December 1991 policy change represented by IT-67-91 beginning 
with the month of the effective date of filing, even if it precedes July 
12, 1990.
For post-eligibility situations, adjudicators will apply the December 1991 
policy change represented by IT-67-91 retroactively to the first month 
covered by the determination that reduced or suspended benefits because 
SSA counted as income food or shelter that the claimant received under a 
bona fide loan agreement.
Because Medellin redeterminations are being made 
pursuant to a court-approved settlement, the ordinary rules of 
administrative finality 
(20 CFR §§ 
416.1487ff.) do not apply. However, any reopenings and revisions 
made subsequently on these same cases will be subject to administrative 
finality, unless the subsequent reopenings are also made pursuant to the 
partial consent judgment.
  
Medellin does not require any change in OHA's 
adjudicatory policies because, since December 17, 1991, OHA adjudicators 
have been excluding bona fide loans of food or shelter in computing SSI 
eligibility and benefit amounts. However, under the 
Medellin partial consent judgment, the Secretary 
will recognize and accept as determinative and final any prior decision of 
the Secretary, made at any administrative level, that there did exist a 
bona fide loan, and the Secretary will honor that determination without 
further inquiry.
  
3. Class Member is Deceased
If a class member is deceased, the usual survivor and substitute party 
provisions apply, and the existing procedures for determining distribution 
of any potential underpayment should be followed.
  VII. Case Coding
HO personnel will code prior claims into the Hearing Office Tracking 
System (HOTS) and the OHA Case Control System (OHA CCS) as 
“reopenings.”
To identify class member cases in HOTS, HO personnel will code 
“ME” in the “Class Action” field. No special 
identification codes will be used in the OHA CCS.
VIII. Inquiries
HO personnel should direct any questions to their Regional Office. 
Regional Office personnel should contact the Division of Field Practices 
and Procedures in the Office of the Chief Administrative Law Judge at 
(703) 305-0022. Headquarters personnel should contact the Division of 
Litigation Analysis and Implementation at 305-0708.
Attachment 1. Teletype Instruction IT-67-91; Issued December 16, 1991
| TELEGRAPHIC MESSAGE | [Transmitted 12/16/91] | 
| NAME OF AGENCY | PRECEDENCE ACTION:  PRIORITY INFO: | SECURITY CLASSIFICATION UNCLASSIFIED | 
| ACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION HHSS | DATE PREPARED 12/3/91 | FILE | 
| FOR INFORMATION CALL | 
| NAME Stephen H. Fear | PHONE NUMBER 59824 | TYPE OF MESSAGE __     __     __ SINGLE BOOK MULTIPLE-             ADDRESS | 
| THIS SPACE FOR USE OF COMMUNICATION UNIT   | 
| MESSAGE TO BE TRANSMITTED (Use double spacing and all capital letters) | 
| TO: FM: SSA, OSSI TO: ALL SSA RCS TO: ALL SSA ARCS TO: ALL SSA PSC/ODIO/INTPSC TO: OPIRQS/OPIRSOS TO: SSA ADS TO: ALL DOS/BOS/TSCS TO: OPIR TO: OMPI TO: HCFA TO: OHA EMERGENCY SSI INSTRUCTIONS OSSI-92-008 [IT-67-91] SUBJECT: POLICY REINTERPRETATION - APPLICABILITY OF LOAN POLICY TO ADVANCES OF FOOD AND/OR SHELTER MANUAL REVISION TO FOLLOW SHORTLY IN POMS SI 00835.480. | 
|  | SECURITY CLASSIFICATION | 
|  | PAGE NO. 1 | NO. OF PGS. 5 | 
STANDARD FORM 14 Previous editions usable NSN 7540-00-684-0964 
14-103
REVISED 11-90
GSA FPMR (41 CFR 101-25.206
 
 
 
 
 
| NAME OF AGENCY | PRECEDENCE ACTION:  PRIORITY INFO: | SECURITY CLASSIFICATION UNCLASSIFIED | 
| ACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION HHSS | DATE PREPARED 12/3/91 | FILE | 
| FOR INFORMATION CALL | 
| NAME Stephen H. Fear | PHONE NUMBER 59824 | TYPE OF MESSAGE __     __     __ SINGLE BOOK MULTIPLE-             ADDRESS | 
| THIS SPACE FOR USE OF COMMUNICATION UNIT   | 
| MESSAGE TO BE TRANSMITTED (Use double spacing and all capital letters) | 
| TO: POLICY REINTERPRETATION EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, FOOD AND/OR SHELTER THAT AN INDIVIDUAL RECEIVES FROM THE HOUSEHOLD IN WHICH HE OR SHE LIVES AND HAS AN OBLIGATION TO PAY FOR AT A FUTURE DATE MAY BE THE BASIS OF A LOAN. DISREGARD THE BAN IN SI 00835.480 C.2. AGAINST TREATING SUCH ADVANCES AS LOANS. ASKING ABOUT A LOAN AGREEMENT — INITIAL CLAIMS AND REINSTATEMENTS IF AN INDIVIDUAL WHO IS APPLYING FOR BENEFITS OR BEING REINSTATED AFTER A PERIOD OF INELIGIBILITY IS NOT PAYING A PRO RATA SHARE OF THE HOUSEHOLD FOOD AND/OR SHELTER EXPENSES, ASK IF HE OR SHE WILL HAVE TO PAY THE HOUSEHOLDER BACK FOR IT. DOCUMENT THE ANSWER OVER THE INDIVIDUAL'S SIGNATURE. A YES ANSWER IS A LOAN ALLEGATION. DETERMINING WHETHER A BONA FIDE LOAN EXISTS FOLLOW SI 01120.220 AND APPLICABLE REGIONAL INSTRUCTIONS TO | 
|  | SECURITY CLASSIFICATION | 
|  | PAGE NO. 2 | NO. OF PGS. 5 | 
STANDARD FORM 14 Previous editions usable NSN 7540-00-684-0964 
14-103
REVISED 11-90
GSA FPMR (41 CFR 101-25.206
 
 
 
 
 
| NAME OF AGENCY | PRECEDENCE ACTION:  PRIORITY INFO: | SECURITY CLASSIFICATION UNCLASSIFIED | 
| ACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION HHSS | DATE PREPARED 12/3/91 | FILE | 
| FOR INFORMATION CALL | 
| NAME Stephen H. Fear | PHONE NUMBER 59824 | TYPE OF MESSAGE __     __     __ SINGLE BOOK MULTIPLE-             ADDRESS | 
| THIS SPACE FOR USE OF COMMUNICATION UNIT   | 
| MESSAGE TO BE TRANSMITTED (Use double spacing and all capital letters) | 
| TO: DOCUMENT AN ALLEGED LOAN AND TO DETERMINE WHETHER IT IS BONA FIDE. DO NOT USE FORMS SSA-2854 AND SSA-2855 FOR IN-KIND LOAN DEVELOPMENT. IF THE ADVANCE OF FOOD AND/OR SHELTER IS THE BASIS FOR A BONA FIDE LOAN, IT IS NOT INCOME. LOAN AMOUNT SPECIFIED IF THE INDIVIDUAL GIVES A DOLLAR AMOUNT FOR THE LOAN, COMPLETE SHARING DEVELOPMENT (SI 00835.160) OR EARMARKED - SHARING DEVELOPMENT (SI 00835.170), AS APPLICABLE, USING THE LOAN AMOUNT AS THE AMOUNT OF THE INDIVIDUAL'S CONTRIBUTION. COUNTABLE ISM MAY BE CHARGED IF THE AMOUNT OF THE CONTRIBUTION IS LESS THAN THE PRO RATA SHARE. LOAN AMOUNT NOT SPECIFIED — OPERATING ASSUMPTION FOR INITIAL CLAIMS AND REINSTATEMENTS IF NO DOLLAR AMOUNT HAS BEEN SPECIFIED (FOR EXAMPLE, IF THE AGREEMENT IS THAT "WE ARE GOING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT I OWE | 
|  | SECURITY CLASSIFICATION | 
|  | PAGE NO. 3 | NO. OF PGS. 5 | 
STANDARD FORM 14 Previous editions usable NSN 7540-00-684-0964 
14-103
REVISED 11-90
GSA FPMR (41 CFR 101-25.206
 
 
 
 
 
| NAME OF AGENCY | PRECEDENCE ACTION:  PRIORITY INFO: | SECURITY CLASSIFICATION UNCLASSIFIED | 
| ACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION HHSS | DATE PREPARED 12/3/91 | FILE | 
| FOR INFORMATION CALL | 
| NAME Stephen H. Fear | PHONE NUMBER 59824 | TYPE OF MESSAGE __     __     __ SINGLE BOOK MULTIPLE-             ADDRESS | 
| THIS SPACE FOR USE OF COMMUNICATION UNIT   | 
| MESSAGE TO BE TRANSMITTED (Use double spacing and all capital letters) | 
| TO: LATER AND I AM GOING TO PAY IT OUT OF MY SSI"), ASSUME THAT THE LOAN AGREEMENT COVERS THE
INDIVIDUAL'S PRO RATA SHARE OF THE FOOD AND/OR SHELTER EXPENSES, AS
APPLICABLE. DO NOT DEVELOP HOUSEHOLD EXPENSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF
DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF THE LOAN. THIS OPERATING ASSUMPTION DOES NOT
APPLY IN CONTINUING ELIGIBILITY SITUATIONS. TYPE H INCOME INPUT IF NO ISM IS BEING CHARGED BECAUSE OF A BONA FIDE LOAN, INPUT A TYPE H INCOME AMOUNT OF ZERO AND TYPE H ID OF “A LOAN” (SEE SM 01005.193 FOR TYPE H INCOME INPUT INSTRUCTIONS). RT DIARY INPUT AND DEVELOPMENT IF NO ISM IS BEING CHARGED BECAUSE OF A BONA FIDE LOAN, SET AN RT DIARY FOR 3 MONTHS AFTER THE ESTIMATED FIRST MONTH OF PAYMENT (SEE SM 01005.230 FOR DA FIELD INPUT INSTRUCTIONS). | 
|  | SECURITY CLASSIFICATION | 
|  | PAGE NO. 4 | NO. OF PGS. 5 | 
STANDARD FORM 14 Previous editions usable NSN 7540-00-684-0964 
14-103
REVISED 11-90
GSA FPMR (41 CFR 101-25.206
 
 
 
 
 
| TELEGRAPHIC MESSAGE | [Transmitted 12/16/91] | 
| NAME OF AGENCY | PRECEDENCE ACTION:  PRIORITY INFO: | SECURITY CLASSIFICATION UNCLASSIFIED | 
| ACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION HHSS | DATE PREPARED 12/3/91 | FILE | 
| FOR INFORMATION CALL | 
| NAME Stephen H. Fear | PHONE NUMBER 59824 | TYPE OF MESSAGE __     __     __ SINGLE BOOK MULTIPLE-             ADDRESS | 
| THIS SPACE FOR USE OF COMMUNICATION UNIT   | 
| MESSAGE TO BE TRANSMITTED (Use double spacing and all capital letters) | 
| TO: WHEN THE DIARY MATURES, DO PRO RATA SHARE DEVELOPMENT BEGINNING WITH THE MONTH AFTER THE INDIVIDUAL FIRST RECEIVED PAYMENT, USING THE AVERAGING INSTRUCTIONS IN SI 00835.475 D. ADMINISTRATIVE FINALITY ONE YEAR REOPENING OF PRIOR DETERMINATIONS FOR CHANGE-OF- POSITION POLICY APPLIES (SEE SI 04070.040 C.3.).             /S/        RHODA
M. G. DAVIS ASSOCIATE COMMISSIONER
 FOR SUPPLEMENTAL
SECURITY INCOME
 
 PUBLISHED INSTRUCTIONS ARE TARGETED
TO REACH USERS BY 7/31/92.
 
 FILE CODE: SI 
1-3.2.5
 | 
|  | SECURITY CLASSIFICATION | 
|  | PAGE NO. 5 | NO. OF PGS. 5 | 
STANDARD FORM 14 Previous editions usable NSN 7540-00-684-0964 
14-103
REVISED 11-90
GSA FPMR (41 CFR 101-25.206
 
 
 
 
 
 
Attachment 2. Medellin v. Shalala Partial Consent 
Judgment; Dated December 16, 1993
 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF 
MISSOURIWESTERN DIVISION
| SONIA MEDELLIN, et al., | ) |  | 
|  | ) |  | 
| Plaintiffs, | ) |  | 
|  | ) |  | 
| v. | ) | Civil NO. 90-0806-CV-W-6 | 
|  | ) |  | 
| DONNA E. SHALALA, | ) |  | 
| SECRETARY OF HEALTH | ) |  | 
| AND HUMAN SERVICES, | ) |  | 
|  | ) |  | 
| Defendant | ) |  | 
     UPON agreement and stipulation of the 
parties, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows:
     A plaintiff class was certified on June 10, 
1992, and subsequently modified on December 18, 1992. Under the Court's 
modified order, the class definition includes all SSI applicants or 
recipients residing in the State of Missouri who have made or will make a 
claim for SSI benefits and received or will receive a decision from the 
defendant denying his or her claim at any administrative level in whole or 
part since November 10, 1986, on the basis that the applicant/recipient 
received in-kind support which defendant considered income, although the 
individual was obligated to repay the amount under a loan agreement.
     On December 18, 1992, the court granted 
plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment. The final judgment of the 
district court was entered on March 3, 1993. Defendant filed a timely 
notice of appeal on April 30, 1993, challenging the district court's 
inclusion of claims lapsing prior to July 12, 1990, in the class. 
Defendant did not appeal the judgment on the merits or the inclusion of 
persons in the class who had live claims1 on or 
after July 12, 1990. The purpose of this Partial Consent Judgement is to 
provide the following relief for the class members not subject to the 
pending appeal:
- 1.  - Effective December 17, 1991, defendant began treating in-kind advances of 
food and/or shelter in the same manner that cash loans and credit 
purchases are treated under 
20 C.F.R. § 
416.1103(f), with the result that bona fide in-kind loans are no 
longer charged as income to SSI applicants and recipients. On December 16, 
1991, the Secretary issued teletype instructions IT-67-91 (Exhibit 1) to 
provide the appropriate operating components of the Social Security 
Administration (SSA) with guidance on implementing the change of position 
regarding treatment of in-kind loans. In July 1992, the Secretary issued 
POMS instructions to implement the change of policy (Exhibit 2), and 
subsequently published Social 
Security Ruling (SSR) 92-8p in 57 Fed. Reg. 40918 (September 8, 
1992) which further explains the new policy. (Exhibit 3) Defendant agrees 
to apply this change of policy, as explained in IT-67-91, 
SSR 92-8p and the 
applicable POMS, to all individuals who meet the class definition set 
forth in the court's June 10, 1992 order. Under the court's order, class 
members must meet the following requirements: - 
- (1) The member shall be a SSI applicant or recipient residing in the State 
of Missouri who has made or will make a claim for SSI benefits; 
and - (2) The member received or will receive a decision from defendant denying 
his or her claim at any administrative level in whole or part; 
and - (3) The basis for this denial must be that the applicant/recipient 
received in-kind support which defendant considered income, although he or 
she was obligated to repay the amount under a loan agreement or business 
arrangement; and - (4) The putative member must have had a § 405(g) claim, based upon 
facts satisfying the above three factors, that arose no more than sixty 
(60) days prior to September 10, 1990 (the filing date of plaintiffs' 
complaint). 
 
- 2.  - By this agreement, all class members with claims lapsing between November 
10, 1986, and July 12, 1990, are excluded from relief pending final 
resolution of all appeals of the court's December 18, 1992, certification 
order. This judgment applies to the class certified by the court order of 
June 10, 1992, and specifically includes: (1) SSI applicants and 
recipients who resided in Missouri at the time their SSI applications were 
denied, or at the time their SSI benefits were reduced or terminated 
between July 12, 1990, and December 31, 1991, because the Secretary 
counted as income in-kind support and maintenance that the applicant or 
recipient was obligated to repay under a loan agreement; and (2) SSI 
applicants and recipients who resided in Missouri during the period July 
12, 1990, to September 10, 1990, and were either appealing or could have 
appealed a determination or decision that resulted in or upheld a denial, 
reduction or termination of SSI benefits that occurred because the 
Secretary counted as income in-kind support and maintenance that the 
applicant or recipient was obligated to repay under a loan agreement while 
a resident of Missouri. 
- 3.  - Within 120 days of the date this agreement is signed by both parties, SSA 
(Social Security Administration) will identify potential class members 
entitled to redeterminations pursuant to this agreement from its computer 
records. Within 150 days of the date this agreement is signed by both 
parties, SSA will send by first class mail a copy of the attached notice 
(Exhibit 4) to individuals whom SSA identifies from its computer records 
as potential class members. SSA will bear the costs of such notification. 
The notices will include a self-addressed postage-paid return envelope for 
mailing the reply form to SSA. 
- 4.  - To qualify for consideration for relief, an individual must contact SSA 
within 60 days of the date he or she receives the notice unless he or she 
can establish good cause for not contacting SSA within the 60 day period. 
Defendant will assume that an individual receives a notice five days after 
the date on the notice, unless he or she can show that it was not received 
within the five day period. 
20 C.F.R. § 
416.1401. Individuals receiving notice under this paragraph may 
request class membership by mailing the reply form to the address 
provided, by telephone, in writing, or in person at any Social Security 
office. To decide whether an individual has established good cause for 
missing the deadline to request review under this agreement, defendant 
will apply the criteria in 
20 C.F.R. § 
416.1411 and Social 
Security Ruling 91-5p. 
- 5.  - With respect to notices that are returned as undeliverable, SSA will 
attempt to obtain updated addresses from the Missouri Department of Social 
Services (DSS). Any attempt by SSA to obtain updated addresses is subject 
to the requirements of the Privacy Act, as amended by the Computer 
Matching and Privacy Protection Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a. SSA will not be 
obligated to bring legal proceedings to gain access to such data system 
records. SSA will mail notices to potential class members for whom new 
addresses are provided by the DSS. 
- 6.  - SSA will instruct those persons making class membership findings that 
class membership is not precluded by a prior decision reducing an 
individual's SSI benefits based on the receipt of in-kind support and 
maintenance even though the individual alleged that the support was made 
pursuant to a loan of food and/or shelter. 
- 7.  - (a) SSA will screen the claim of each individual who timely responds to 
the notice discussed in paragraph three to ascertain whether the 
individual could become eligible or re-eligible for SSI and/or receive 
additional SSI if he or she were to meet the criteria under paragraph one. 
SSA will inform the individual in writing of the outcome of the screening 
and a copy of this notice will be sent to counsel for plaintiffs. - (b) For each requester who is found to have met the criteria in (a), SSA 
will determine whether the individual meets the criteria in paragraph one 
and properly requested review under paragraph four. If SSA finds that a 
requester does not meet the criteria of paragraph one, SSA will notify the 
individual and explain why the requester is not a class member. A copy of 
this notice will be sent to counsel for plaintiffs. If SSA determines that 
the requester did not properly request review under paragraph four, SSA 
will notify the individual and explain that the request for review was not 
timely. A copy of this notice will be sent to counsel for 
plaintiffs. 
- 8.  - If SSA determines that an individual is not a class member based on a 
procedural defect in requesting review or because the individual does not 
meet prongs one or four of the class definition contained in paragraph 
one, and the individual disputes that determination plaintiffs' counsel 
shall contact a designated person within the Office of the General 
Counsel, Department of Health and Human Services, and the parties will 
attempt to informally resolve the dispute. The Secretary will make 
available to plaintiffs' counsel the files of any persons denied class 
membership at a mutually acceptable location in Kansas City, Missouri. 
Plaintiffs' counsel shall review the files within 60 days of the date the 
files are made available to them. The court shall retain jurisdiction to 
resolve class membership disputes of this nature which the parties are 
unable to resolve. 
- 9.  - Defendant further agrees to: - a.  - Recognize and accept as determinative and final any prior determination of 
the Secretary at any administrative level for those members of the group 
as defined in paragraph one, that a bona fide loan of food and/or shelter 
existed, and to honor that determination without further inquiry; 
and 
- b.  - Provide the right to a determination on the issue of the existence of a 
bona fide in-kind loan for individuals (1) who timely request review under 
paragraph four, and (2) who could become eligible or re-eligible for SSI 
and/or receive additional SSI if the individual were to meet the criteria 
under paragraph one. Determinations made under this paragraph will be 
afforded the appeal rights set forth in 20 C.F.R. Part 416, Subpart 
N. 
 
- 10.  - Individuals described in paragraph 9(b) will be contacted by SSA and 
informed of their right to submit evidence in support of their claims. An 
appointment will be made to interview an individual, if SSA finds that an 
interview is necessary, or if an individual requests an interview. 
Individuals can request an interview by telephone, in writing, or in 
person at any Social Security office. SSA will make determinations on 
individuals' claims that they received loans of food and/or shelter. A 
copy of the determination will be sent to class counsel. 
- 11.  - When an individual described in paragraph 9(b) does not have an active 
claim pending at any administrative level at the time of the interview, 
SSA will review the loan allegation as though it were a request for 
reconsideration. 
- 12.  - With respect to individuals who are class members, for all months for 
which it is determined that such individuals received food and/or shelter 
pursuant to a bona fide loan, SSA will determine the class members' SSI 
benefit amounts and/or eligibility without counting such food and/or 
shelter as income and inform the individual in writing of that 
determination. If the determination results in a reinstatement of 
benefits, the first month to which the determination applies is the first 
month for which benefits are reinstated. 
- 13.  - Within 150 days of the date this agreement is signed by both parties, and 
every 90 days thereafter, defendant shall submit a written report to the 
court and to plaintiffs' counsel, which includes the following 
information: - a.  - The number of individuals to whom the notification under paragraph three 
was sent. 
- b.  - The number of individuals who responded to the notices described in 
paragraph three. 
- c.  - The number of individuals determined to be class members. 
- d.  - The number of individuals determined not to be class members. 
 
- 14.  - SSA will distribute POMS instructions reasonably necessary to carry out 
the terms of this partial consent judgment. A draft of proposed 
Medellin POMS will be provided to class counsel for 
comment prior to finalization. The Secretary will consider but is not 
bound by class counsel's comments. At the same time as such instructions 
are sent to all appropriate offices, divisions, levels, departments, etc., 
of the Social Security Administration, SSA will also send plaintiffs' 
counsel the final instructional materials. 
- 15.  - SSA agrees to recompute Donald Langley's SSI benefits for December 1988 
through July 1989, and for October 1989, and December 1989 without 
counting as income in-kind support and maintenance that he received as a 
loan. 
- 16.  - Plaintiffs agree that if the Secretary should lose her appeal of the 
lapsed claims issue before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, they will 
not pursue implementation of relief for lapsed claims until the time for 
seeking certiorari to the Supreme Court has run, and if certiorari is 
sought by the Secretary, until much time as all final appeals in the case 
have been resolved. 
- 17.  - The court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter for the enforcement 
of the provisions of this Partial Consent Judgment. 
     LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY
     Dated this 
16th day of 
December, 1993.
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  | _____________/s/_______________ FERNANDO
J. GAITAN, JR.
 United States District Judge
 | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
| _____________/s/_______________ MARIA
T. DUGAN, Bar #39638
 Legal Aid of Western Missouri
 600
Lathrop Building
 1005 Grand Avenue
 Kansas City,
Missouri 64l06-2216
 (816) 474-6750
 | ________12/1/93____________ Date
 
 | 
|  |  | 
| _____________/s/_______________ JAMES
MARSHALL SMITH, Bar #25688
 Legal Aid of Western Missouri
 600
Lathrop Building
 1005 Grand Avenue
 Kansas City,
Missouri 64106-2216
 (816) 474-6750
 
 
 ATTORNEYS
FOR PLAINTIFFS
 
 
 MARIETTA PARKER
 United
States Attorney
 | ________12/1/93____________ Date
 
 | 
|  |  | 
| _____________/s/_______________ GAY
L. TEDDER, Bar #34846
 Assistant United States Attorney
 1201
Walnut Street
 Suite 2300
 Kansas City, Missouri
64106-2149
 (816) 426-3130
 
 ATTORNEYS
FOR DEFENDANT
 | ___________________________ Date
 
 | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
Exhibit 1 - [See IT-67-91 at Attachment 1]
 
 
Explanation of Acronyms Designating Addresses of Teletype IT-67-91— 
Medellin, et al.
| Acronym | Explanation | 
|  |  | 
| SSA RCS | Social Security Administration Regional Commissioners | 
|  |  | 
| SSA ARCS | Social Security Administration Assistant Regional Commissioners | 
|  |  | 
| SSA PSC/ODIO/INTPSC | Social Security Administration Program Service Centers; Office of Disability and International Operations; International Program Service Center | 
|  |  | 
| OPIRQS/OPIRSOS | Office of Program and Integrity Quality Review Specialists; Office of Program and Integrity Satellite Office Specialists | 
|  |  | 
| SSA ADS | Social Security Administration Area Directors | 
|  |  | 
| DOS/BOS/TSCS | District Offices; Branch Offices; Teleservice Centers | 
|  |  | 
| OPIR | Office of Program and Integrity Reviews | 
|  |  | 
| OMPI | Office of Operations Management and Program Integration | 
|  |  | 
| HCFA | Health Care Financing Administration | 
|  |  | 
| OHA | Office of Hearings and Appeals | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
Exhibit 2
|  |  | 
| TRANSMITTAL NO. 29SSA Pub. No. 68-0500835
 July 1992
 
 | Audience:DO/BO/TSC: CR, CR, TXVI, DRI,
 FR, OA, OS, RR, SR, TSC-SR;
 PSC: IMPS
 
 Originating Office: OSSI
 | 
|  |  | 
|  | 
| PROGRAM OPERATIONS MANAUAL SYSTEM | 
| Part 05 - Supplemental Security Income | 
| Chapter 008 - Income | 
| Subchapter 35 - Living Arrangements | 
| and In-Kind Support and Maintenance | 
|  | 
|  | ____________________________________________________ | 
|  | ACTION NOTES | 
|  |  | 
|  | SI 00835-480 C.2.—Add “-PRIOR TO JANUARY 1991” to the subsection title. At the end of the sentence, add “See SI E00835.481 for instructions for periods after December 1990.” SI 00835.481—Add “See SI E00835.481 for instructions for periods after December 1990.” | 
|  | ____________________________________________________ | 
As a result of several challenges in the courts to our policy of not 
recognizing loans of in-kind support and maintenance (ISM) from within a 
household, the Commissioner decided to change the policy. On December 16, 
1991, a teletype (IT-67-91) was released to all field offices to implement 
the policy change nationwide.
This transmittal manualizes and expands on the instructions in that 
teletype. It also includes additional instructions for implementing the 
policy change for residents of the Fifth and Ninth Circuit Courts. This 
transmittal also provides instructions for effectuating the U.S. District 
Court's decision in the case of Gale R. Johnson, et al. v. 
Sullivan regarding loans of ISM from within a household for 
residents of Idaho.
| U.S. Department ofHealth and Human Services
 Social Security Administration
 Office of Policy
 SSA Pub. No. 68-0500835
 I.C.N. 993545
 
 
 | Effective Date: Upon Receipt
 
 Selective Distribution
 J68/PSC
 | 
This transmittal obsoletes teletype IT-67-91. It contains new material and 
section E00835.481 should be read in its entirety by all field offices 
serving Idaho residents.
|  | 
| Explanation of Manual Changes | 
|  | 
E00835.431 Loans of Food and/or Shelter from Within a Household
This new section supplements the instructions in POMS 
SI 00835.481 on 
contributions for residents of the Fifth Circuit (Louisiana, Mississippi, 
and Texas). Those instructions were required as a result of SSA's 
acquiescence in the court case Hickman v. Bowen. As 
a result of the change in policy on loans of ISM from within a household, 
national policy is now the same as the policy ordered by the Circuit Court 
of Appeals in the Fifth Circuit.
This new section provides that when food and/or shelter that an individual 
receives from the household in which he/she lives must be paid for at a 
future date, we will no longer determine that the individual receives ISM 
from the household, provided that the advance of food and shelter is a 
bona fide loan. This policy is effective beginning with December 17, 
1990.
This section also provides instructions for applying the policy to 
residents of the Fifth Circuit as a result of the 
Hickman Acquiescence Ruling, and to residents of 
the Ninth Circuit as a result of the Circuit Court of Appeals decision in 
Ceguerra v. Secretary. (The Ninth Circuit includes 
Alaska, Arizona, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, the 
Northern Mariana Islands, Oregon, and Washington.) In lieu of an 
acquiescence ruling that would otherwise be required under SSA 
acquiescence policy, the Commissioner decided to issue a Social Security 
Ruling (SSR) to change national policy on loans of ISM. (That ruling had 
not yet been published in the 
Federal Register when this 
transmittal was printed. Field offices will be notified in a future NEWS 
item when the ruling is published. The date of publication and ruling 
number may be filled in at that time.) Special rules apply to requests for 
application of the new policy to a determination or decision that was made 
on or after the court of appeals' decision applicable to the claimant's 
State of residence.
 
E00835.432 Loans of Food and/or Shelter from Within a 
Household—Idaho Residents
This new section provides special instructions for processing cases of 
class members under the Johnson, et. al. v. 
Sullivan court case. These instructions are limited to 
residents of Idaho.
E00835.483 Developmental Procedures for Johnson 
Cases
This new section provides instructions for developing the nonmedical 
factors or eligibility and payment amount in 
Johnson cases. These instructions allow use of 
streamlined verification and documentation, similar to those used to 
process Zebley cases.
 
 
 
 
TM 29 
7-92                    Table 
of Contents
 
__________________________________________________________________________
| E00835.00 | LIVING ARRANGEMENTS AND IN-KIND SUPPORT AND MAINTENANCE | 
Section
 Rental Subsidies for Residents of New York,
 
Connecticut, and Vermont 
.................................................E00835.381
 Loans 
of Food and/or Shelter from Within a Household 
.......................E00835.481
 Loans of Food and/or Shelter 
from Within a Household
 Idaho Residents 
..........................................................E00835.482
 
Developmental Procedures for Johnson Cases 
.................................E00835.483
 
 
 
| TM 29 7-92 | INCOME | SI E00835.481C.1. | 
| ____________________________________________________________________________ | 
|  |  |  | 
E00835.481 LOANS OF FOOD AND/OR SHELTER FROM WITHIN A HOUSEHOLD
|  |  |  | 
| CITATIONS: |  | Regulations, 20 CFR 416.1103(f); Social Security Rulings, SSR 92- ___ | 
|  |  |  | 
| A. POLICY— GENERAL |  | SSA traditionally had held that a household's advance of food and/or shelter to a household member is not a loan. SSA has been under court orders in the Fifth and Ninth Circuits to recognize advances by a household of food and shelter to household members as a loan, where there was an obligation to repay its value. On December 16, 1991, SSA issued a teletype (IT-67-91) to adopt this policy nationally. | 
|  |  |  | 
| B. POLICY—LOANS OF FOOD AND/OR SHELTER |  | Food and/or shelter that an individual receives from the household in which he/she lives and has an obligation to pay for at a future date may be a loan. | 
|  |  |  | 
| C. POLICY—EFFECTIVE DATE |  | The new policy has an effective date of December 17, 1990 but may apply earlier than that in some cases. | 
|  |  |  | 
| 1. Applying the New Policy Under Administrative Finality Rules—All States |  | a. Initial Determinations Made on or After December 17, 1990 | 
|  |  | The initial determination, reconsidered determination, ALJ decision, or AC decision pertaining to the application, whichever is most recent, will be reopened based on a request made within 1 year of the notice of the initial determination. | 
|  |  | The new policy then applies beginning with the month of the effective date of filing, even if it precedes December 1990. | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | b. Redeterminations Completed on or After December 17, 1990 | 
|  |  | The initial or reconsidered determination, ALJ decision, or AC decision pertaining to the redetermination will be reopened based on a request made within 1 year of the notice of redetermination. | 
|  |  | Apply the new policy beginning with the month of the notice of redetermination. However, see c. below regarding deemed determinations that usually can be revised for months prior to the month of the notice of redetermination. | 
|  |  |  | 
| c. Deemed Determinations |  | A deemed determination (as defined in SI 04070.030) will be reopened based on a request made within 1 year of the first day of the month to which it applies. | 
|  |  | The new policy then applies beginning with that month. | 
|  |  |  | 
| 2. Applying New Policy Under Readjudication Rules — Louisiana, Misssissippi, and Texas |  | a. Initial Claims - Initial Determinations, Reconsidered Determinations, ALJ Decisions, and AC Decisions Pertaining to Them | 
|  |  | If the most recent of these determinations was made during the period November 10, 1986 through November 14, 1988 (the date of the court decision in Hickman v. Bowen through the date the Hickman Acquiescence Ruling (AR) was published), there is no time limit on when the individual may request application of the new policy. The rules in GN 03501.015 on readjudication apply to such requests. | 
|  |  | In readjudicating one of these determinations, the new policy applies to all months covered by the initial determination, including months prior to the court's decision. | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | b. Redeterminations - Initial Determinations, Reconsidered Determinations, ALJ Decisions, and AC Decisions Pertaining to Them | 
|  |  | If the most recent of these determinations was made during the period November 1, 1986, through November 14, 1988 (the first day of the month of the court decision in Hickman v. Bowen through the date the Hickman AR was published), there is no time limit on when an individual can request application of the new policy to it. | 
|  |  | The new policy then applies beginning with the month of the notice of redetermination. | 
|  |  |  | 
| c. Deemed Determinations |  | Deemed determinations are not subject to readjudication. | 
|  |  | REMINDER: See 1.c. above if reopening a deemed determination under the rules of administrative finality would benefit the individual. | 
|  |  |  | 
| 3. Applying New Policy Under Readjudication Rules — Arizona, Alaska, California, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Northern Mariana Islands Oregon, and Washington |  | a. Initial Claims—Initial Determinations, Reconsidered Determinations, ALJ and AC Decisions Pertaining to Them | 
|  |  | Same as 2.a. above, except that the determination to be readjudicated must have been made from May 15, 1991 (the date of the court decision in Cequerra v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) through _______, 1992. | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | b. Redeterminations—Initial Determinations, Reconsidered Determinations, ALJ and AC Decisions Pertaining to Them | 
|  |  | Same as 2.b. above, except that the determination to be readjudicated must have been made from May 1, 1991 through _______, 1992 (the first day of the month in which the Cequerra court decision was rendered through the date SSR 92-__ was published), and the new policy then applies beginning with the month of the notice of redetermination. | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | c. Exception for Residents of Idaho Who Are Members of the Johnson Class | 
|  |  | Same as a. and b. above, except that an individual who was a resident of Idaho as of January 31, 1992 may request application of the new policy to a determination or decision made from April 1, 1978 through _____,1992. | 
|  |  | IMPORTANT: See SI E00835.482 for instructions for residents of Idaho who are Johnson class members. | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | d. Deemed Determinations | 
|  |  | See 2.c. above. | 
|  |  |  | 
| D. PROCEDURE |  | Follow these procedures to apply this new policy in both initial claims and posteligibility cases. | 
|  |  |  | 
| 1. Determine Whether a Bona Fide Loan Exists |  | If a loan is alleged, follow SI 01120.220 and applicable regional instructions to determine whether the advance of food and shelter constitutes a bona fide loan. | 
|  |  | NOTE: It is not necessary to specifically ask whether the food and shelter is a loan except in initial claims and reinstatements. | 
|  |  | If an individual who is applying for, or who is requesting reinstatement of, SSI benefits is not paying for food and/or shelter that he/she receives from the household in which he/she lives: | 
|  |  | • Ask whether the individual has an agreement to pay back the householder (or other household member). NOTE: A yes answer is a loan allegation.• Document the answer over the individual's signature.• Do not use Forms SSA-2854 and SSA-2855 for in-kind loan development.
 | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | IMPORTANT: Subsequent evidence that the individual did not pay for food and/or shelter determined to be a loan does not negate the determination that it was a valid loan, unless State law requires that loan repayment begin within a specified period of time. See regional instructions on loan development. | 
|  |  |  | 
| 2. Determine ISM |  | Follow the procedures below to determine the existence and amount of ISM from within the household, when there is a bona fide loan of food and/or shelter. | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | a. Household Operating Expenses | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | Develop household operating expenses and determine whether the loan covers the value of the food and/or shelter received. | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | If the loan does not cover the value of the food and/or shelter being received, see c. or d. below to determine countable ISM. | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | b. Developmental Tolerance for Initial Claims and Reinstatements | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | If the loan agreement does not specify a dollar amount (if, for example, the individual and the householder have agreed to figure out the amount owed when the individual is paid his SSI), assume that the loan agreement covers the individual's pro rate share of the household's food and/or shelter expenses. It is not necessary to develop household expenses if the only reason for doing so is to determine the amount of the loan. | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | Do not apply this tolerance in continuing eligibility cases. | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | c. Both Food and Shelter Received from the Household | 
|  |  | Apply the value of the one-third reduction (VTR) when the claimant receives both his/her food and shelter from within the household (and does not have ownership or rental liability), and the loan does not cover his/her pro rate share of the household operating expenses. | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | d. Food or Shelter Not Provided by the Household | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | When the VTR cannot apply because of | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | • separate purchase of food, or• the loan does not cover the cost of the food or shelter received from the household.
 | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | determine the amount of countable ISM by subtracting the amount of the loan from the value of the food or shelter received. | 
|  |  |  | 
| 3. Systems Input — Unearned Income (UM) |  | If no ISM is being charged because of a bona fide loan, input an unearned income type “M” entry (see SM 01005.193) with a zero amount and an identification entry of “A LOAN.” | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | If a reduced amount of ISM is being charged because of a bona fide loan, e.g., in an earmarked sharing situation where the recipient receives food from someone outside the household, but has promised to pay the householder back for the shelter he has received, input the type “H” entry with the appropriate dollar amount and the identification entry “A LOAN.” | 
|  |  |  | 
| 4. Diary Input and Development |  | If ISM is reduced or eliminated because of a bona fide loan and the developmental tolerance in 2.b. above applies, set an RT diary in the DA field for 3 months after the estimated first month of payment (or reinstated payment). (See SM 01005.230 for DA field input instructions.) | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  | When the diary matures, develop inside ISM per SI 00835.520 beginning with the month after the first month of payment. | 
|  |  |  | 
| E. REFERENCE |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
Exhibit 3
Social Security
Ruling
__________________________________________________________________________
 
SSR 92-8p 
EFFECTIVE/PUBLICATION DATE: 09/08/92 
__________________________________________________________________________
General Information
Social Security Rulings (SSRs) are published under the authority of the 
Commissioner of Social Security and make available to the public a series 
of precedential decisions relating to Federal old-age, survivors, 
disability, supplemental security income, and black lung benefits 
programs. SSRs may be based on case decisions made at all administrative 
levels of adjudication, Federal court decisions, Commissioner's decisions, 
opinions of the Office of the General Counsel, and other policy 
interpretations of the law and regulations. SSRs are first published in 
the Federal Register. SSRs are effective upon 
publication, and the effective date is shown on the first page of each 
Ruling. Although SSRs do not have the force and effect of the law or 
regulations, they are binding on all components of the Social Security 
Administration, in accordance with section 402.35(b)(2) of Social 
Security Regulations and are to be relied upon as precedents in 
adjudicating other cases. An SSR may be superseded, modified, or revoked 
by later legislation, regulations, court decisions, or Rulings.
SSRs are published on a flow basis and may be purchased by annual 
subscription or by individual copy from the Superintendent of Documents, 
U.S Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. A 
Cumulative Edition, reproducing all of the SSRs 
published in 1990 and 1991 that have not been superseded or rescinded, may 
also be purchased from the Superintendent of Documents. Since the cost of 
these publications and subscription changes periodically, the current 
price will be supplied upon request to the Superintendent of Documents. A 
check or money order covering the price of the publication should 
accompany the order. SSRs from 1960 through 1989 are available to the 
public, free of charge, upon request to the Social Security 
Administration, Office of Regulations, 3-8-5 Operations Building, 6401 
Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235. Requests for free copies of the 
SSRs must include the requester's street address rather than a post office 
box.
__________________________________________________________________________
|  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
 Social Security Administration
 Office of Policy
 
 
 
 
 | Distributed on list 179 | 
Social Security
Ruling
__________________________________________________________________________
 
SSR 92-8p 
EFFECTIVE/PUBLICATION DATE: 09/08/92 
__________________________________________________________________________
POLICY INTERPRETATION RULING
 TITLE XVI: SSI LOAN POLICY, INCLUDING ITS
APPLICABILITY TO 
ADVANCES OF FOOD AND/OR SHELTER
Purpose: This Ruling defines a loan for SSI purposes. It also explains 
when the proceeds of a loan count as resources under the SSl program, when 
they do not count as income, and how SSA treats a loan agreement when the 
lender is an SSI applicant or recipient. 
Social Security Ruling (SSR) 
78-26 previously addressed these issues.
In addition, this Ruling reinterprets SSI regulations to permit treating, 
as the basis for a loan, food or shelter that an SSI applicant or 
recipient receives from someone in whose household he or she lives and has 
an obligation to pay for at a future date.
This Ruling supersedes SSR 
78-26.
Citations (authority): Sections 
1611 and 
1631(e)(1)(B) of the 
Social Security Act, as amended, Regulations No. 16. Subpart K, sections 
416.1103(f) and 416.1133(a).
Background: The Social Security Act, at section 1612(a)(21(A), provides 
that unearned income includes in-kind support and maintenance. 
Regulations, at 20 CFR 
416.1121(h), define in-kind support and maintenance as food, 
clothing, and shelter furnished to an SSI applicant or recipient. 
Regulations, at 20 CFR 
416.1103(f), provide that the proceeds of a loan are not 
income.
In 1978, the Social Security Administration (SSA) published 
SSR 78-26, setting 
forth its policy regarding the treatment of loans under the SSI program. 
SSR 78-26 gave the 
following information:
When an individual borrows and receives money through a lending process, 
as a borrower, or receives money as repayment on an outstanding loan 
(lender), a determination must be made whether such money is considered a 
resource or income for SSI eligibility and payment purposes. Since 
inception of the SSI program, proceeds of a loan have not been considered 
income to the borrower because of the obligation to repay. Existing 
regulations do not spell this out. Similarly, since inception of the SSI 
program, outstanding loans made by an SSI applicant or recipient from 
money available to him/her have been considered a countable resource to 
the extent there has been a negotiable instrument showing existence of a 
loan agreement. This is because a negotiable instrument is convertible to 
cash and, therefore, meets the definition of a resource for SSI purposes. 
In such a case, the negotiable instrument would be a countable resource to 
the lender. 
Existence of a negotiable instrument, however, is not the sole criterion 
of a bona fide loan. The interpretation of a bona fide loan for SSI 
purposes is that where a borrower receives money (from relatives, friends 
or others) a loan is created if there is an understanding between the 
parties that the money borrowed is to be repaid and it is recognized as an 
enforceable contract under State law. The transaction which creates a loan 
can be in the form of a written or oral agreement if enforceable under 
State law. Absent a negotiable instrument, a bona fide loan must still be 
convertible to cash in order to be considered a resource for SSI 
purposes.
Under this policy interpretation, a householder's advance of food or 
shelter to a household member could not be treated as a loan because it 
did not involve an actual advance of cash.
In 1986, in Hickman v. Bowen (803 F.2d 1377), the 
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that there was no jurisdiction for 
treating cash and in-kind income differently under 
20 CFR 
416.1103(f). Since both are income, both could be the subject of a 
loan. The court concluded that food or shelter provided by a householder 
to a household member is a loan if the household member is obligated to 
repay the debt.
In 1988, SSA issued Acquiescence 
Ruling (AR) 88-7(5) to implement the Hickman 
decision for individuals residing in the States in the Fifth Circuit 
(Louisiana. Mississippi, and Texas). 
AR 88-7(5) instructed that 
when an SSI claimant or recipient alleges receiving in-kind support and 
maintenance, that in-kind support and maintenance will be considered a 
loan and its value will not be considered for the purpose of calculating 
SSI benefits, but only if the applicant or recipient can demonstrate that 
the in-kind support and maintenance received was, in fact, loaned to him 
or her in realistic anticipation of repayment, that he or she intends to 
repay the debt, and that under the terms of 
SSR 78-26 a bona fide 
loan agreement has been made.
In 1991, in Cequerra v. Secretary of Health and Human 
Services (933 F.2d 735), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals 
issued an opinion which adopted the rationale of the Fifth Circuit Court 
of Appeals in Hickman. Absent a change in national 
policy, SSA acquiescence policy would thus require the issuance of another 
acquiescence ruling similar to AR 
88-7(5) for individuals residing in the Ninth Circuit (Alaska. 
Arizona, California. Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Northern 
Mariana Islands, Oregon, and Washington).
In view of these recent court decisions, SSA has decided to reinterpret 
its regulations on the treatment in the SSI program of advances of food 
and shelter to an SSI applicant or recipient by an individual in whose 
household he or she is residing.
Policy Interpretation: For purposes of 
determining when a loan is not considered income and when a loan is 
considered a countable resource under the SSI program, the following 
policies apply:
- 1.  - A loan means an advance from lender to borrower that the borrower must 
repay, with or without interest. A loan can be cash or an in-kind advance 
in lieu of cash. For example, an advance of food or shelter can represent 
a loan of the pro rata share of household operating expenses. This applies 
to any commercial or noncommercial loan (between reIatives, friends, or 
others) that is recognized as enforceable under State law. The loan 
agreement may be oral or written, as long as it is enforceable under State 
law. 
- 2.  - Any advance an SSI applicant or recipient receives that meets the above 
definition of a loan is not income for SSI purposes since it is subject to 
repayment. Any portion of borrowed funds that the borrower does not spend 
is a countable resource to the borrower if retained into the month 
following the month of receipt. 
- 3.  - When money or an in-kind advance in lieu of cash is given and accepted 
based on any understanding other than that it is to be repaid by the 
receiver, there is no loan involved for SSI purposes. It could be a gift, 
support payments, in-kind support and maintenance, etc., and must be 
treated as provided for in the rules applicable to such items. 
- 4.  - If there is a bona fide loan as defined in (1) above, there is a 
rebuttable presumption that the loan agreement is a resource of the lender 
for SSI purposes. - For example, an SSI applicant or recipient reports making a loan to a 
relative. The loan agreement is oral. The oral agreement is found to be 
binding under State law. Accordingly, the loan is presumed to be a 
resource of the lender because it can be converted to cash if the lender 
calls for repayment from the borrower. The lender can rebut this 
presumption by showing that the loan cannot be converted to cash—for 
example, because the borrower died without leaving an estate. 
- 5.  - Money a lender receives as repayment of a loan (which meets the definition 
of a resource) reduces the outstanding loan balance and is considered a 
countable resource to the lender inasmuch as the repayment amount 
represents a return of part of the loan principal; i.e., the total value 
of the resource, which is the repayment amount plus the outstanding loan 
balance, remains unchanged. 
- 6.  - Interest on a loan is counted as unearned income to the lender in the 
month of receipt and, if retained, is a resource as in (2) above. 
Documentation: Evidence must be obtained 
with respect to the existence of a bona fide loan agreement. The burden of 
proof with respect to the bona fide nature of the loan is with the 
applicant or recipient.
Effective Date: The effective date of 
this Ruling is the date of its publication in the FederaI 
Register. Determinations made before that date regarding 
advances of food or shelter may be reopened and revised subject to the 
rules of administrative finality of 
20 CFR 
416.1488(a).
The AR for the Hickman decision 
(AR 88-7(5)), is being 
rescinded through a separate publication in the FederaI 
Register. However, anyone to whom the 
Hickman AR would have applied, had it remained in 
effect, may request application of the policy contained in this Ruling to 
determinations made by SSA between the date of the Fifth Circuit Court of 
Appeals decision (November 10, 1986) and the date this Ruling is published 
in the FederaI Register if he or she first 
demonstrates that application of this Ruling could change the prior 
determination or decision. In addition, anyone to whom a 
Cequerra AR would have applied, had one been 
issued, may request application of this Ruling to determinations made by 
SSA between the date of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision (May 
15, 1991) and the date this Ruling is published in the FederaI 
Register if he or she first demonstrates that application of 
this Ruling could change the prior determination or decision.
 
 
 
 
Exhibit 4
| SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME
 Important
Information
 
 REPRESENTATIVE PAYEE NAME 
FOR
 RECIPIENT'S
NAME
 Street Address
 City/State/Zip Code
 | Date:
 
 Claim
Number:
 
 SSA
 FIELD OFFICE NAME
 Street
Address
 City/State/Zip Code
 Telphone Number
 | 
Please read this letter carefully. If you think we owe you money, please let us know right away.
We are writing to tell you that we may owe you money because of a recent 
court case about Supplemental Security Income (SSI). The name of the case 
is Medellin v. Sullivan. This case is about the way 
we figure SSI for some people. As a result, you may be able to get SSI or 
more SSI. We may owe you money 
even if you are no longer an SSI recipient.
WE COUNT FOOD AND SHELTER FROM OTHERS AS INCOME
If you live in your own home and someone else who lives with you gives you 
food or pays for your food or shelter, we count that help as income. If 
you live in someone else's home or apartment, we count the food and 
shelter you receive from the person you live with if you do not pay for 
it. We used to count this help as income even if you had to pay back the 
people who helped you with your food and shelter.
HOW THE MEDELLIN CASE MAY AFFECT YOU
The Medellin case says that we should not count the 
help you received for your food and shelter 
if the help you received was intended to be a loan. 
It could be a loan even if you did not put the loan in writing. If you are 
not sure if you had a loan, you should contact us anyway.
YOU MAY BE DUE SSI OR MORE SSI
Under the Medellin case, Missouri residents may be 
able to get SSI or more SSI if:
- • - You received help with your food or shelter (or both); and 
- • - we counted this help that you received with your food or shelter when we 
decided if you could get SSI or when we figured the amount of your SSI 
payment; and 
- • - you and the person who helped you agreed that you had to pay them back for 
all the help you received; and 
- • - sometime after July 7, 1990 you received a letter from us telling you that 
we were counting the help you received with your food or shelter (or 
both), or 
- • - sometime after July 11, 1990 you were appealing our decision to count this 
help as income, or 
- • - sometime after July 11, 1990 you could have appealed our decision to count 
this help as income. 
WHAT YOU SHOULD DO IF YOU THINK MEDELLIN APPLIES TO 
YOU
If you think we owe you money because of the 
Medellin case, you must contact us within 65 days 
of the date of this notice. You can do this by sending the enclosed 
"Medellin v. Sullivan Reply Form" to us in the 
return envelope provided, or by calling or visiting your local Social 
Security office.
WHAT WE WILL DO
When we hear from you, we will:
- • -  ask you for information we need to figure out whether the help you 
received was a loan 
- • -  use the facts to see if you can get SSI or more SSI. 
If we decide that the help you received was a loan, then we may owe you 
SSI money. We will figure the amount we owe you, and will send you a 
letter explaining the amount and when to expect your payment.
If we decide that you are not eligible for any more SSI, we will send you 
a letter explaining the reason(s), and what to do if you disagree.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS
If you have any questions, you may call your local Social Security office. 
The address and telephone number of your local office is printed at the 
top of the first page of this letter.
Be sure to tell us that you got a Medellin letter. 
It will help us answer your questions.
Also, you may write or visit any Social Security office. If you visit a 
local Social Security office, bring this letter with you. You may call 
ahead to make an appointment. This will help us serve you more quickly 
when you arrive at the office.
IF YOU NEED MORE INFORMATION OR HELP
If you need help reading this letter or deciding what you should do, you 
can ask a friend, a relative, or a lawyer. You may be eligible for free 
legal advice from Legal Aid of Western Missouri, Inc. Their telephone 
number is (816) 474-6750. REMEMBER, if you think we owe you money, please 
fill out the enclosed “Medellin v. Sullivan Reply Form” and 
send it to us right away, or call or visit your local Social Security 
office.
If we do not hear from you within 65 days of the date of this notice, we 
might not be able to help you.
Enclosure:
Medellin v. Sullivan Reply Form
 
 
 
 
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Social Security Administration
__________________________________________________________________________
MEDELLIN v. SULLIVAN REPLY FORM
__________________________________________________________________________
IMPORTANT 
YOUR CASE WILL BE DROPPED UNLESS WE HEAR FROM YOU
__________________________________________________________________________
| Name Address
 City,
State, Zip
 | Date: 
 Social
Security Number:
 | 
IF YOU WANT THIS CLAIM REVIEWED, PLEASE SIGN AND DATE THIS FORM AND RETURN 
IT IN THE SELF-ADDRESSED, PRE-PAID ENVELOPE.
SIGNATURE______________________ DATE___________________
Enter the area code and the telephone number where we can call 
you.
(AREA CODE) __________________ TELEPHONE NO. ____________
If your address is different than shown above, or if your Social Security 
Number is different, please write in below your correct address and/or 
your correct Social Security Number
__________________________________________________________________________
 
ADDRESS (NUMBER AND STREET, APT.NO., P.O. 
BOX or RURAL ROUTE)
 
 
______________________________________________ 
_______________________
 
CITY and STATE ZIP CODE
 
 ____________________________________________
 
SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER
 
 
Privacy Act Notice
The Social Security Act (Section 205(a) of title II, 702 of title VII, 
1631(e)(1)(A) and (B) of title XVI, and 1869(b)(1) and (c) of title XVIII 
allows us to collect the information on this form. We will use this 
information to process your claim. You do not have to give us this 
information, but without it we may not be able to process your claim. 
Information may be disclosed to another person or to another government 
agency for the Administration of the Social Security program or for the 
administration of programs requiring coordination with the Social Security 
Administration. These and other reasons why information about you may be 
used or given out are explained in the Federal Register. If you want to 
learn more about this, contact ant Social Security office.
1 A live claim for purposes of this class, is 
one which was pending at any administrative level or in federal court on 
or after July 12, 1990, or one for which the period to appeal an 
administrative or judicial decision had not run on July 12, 1990.
 
Attachment 3. Example: Notice of Important Information — No Relief (Other 
Reason)
| Social Security Administration |  | 
| Supplemental Security Income |  | 
| Important Information |  | 
|  | Office Address: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Telephone Number: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Date: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Social Security Number: | 
|  | 999-99-9999 | 
|  |  | 
| Claimant |  | 
| Street Address |  | 
| City, State Zip Code |  | 
|  |  | 
You asked us to look at your Supplemental Security Income (SSI) case to 
see if we owe you money because of the Medellin 
court case. This case changes how we count help you receive from someone 
you live with if you do not pay for it. The 
Medellin case says that we should not count the 
help you received (food or shelter or both) if the help you received was 
intended to be a loan.
The information we have shows that you are not ____(1)____ because of the 
Medellin case for the following 
reason(s):____(2)____.
If You Disagree With Us
If you disagree with us, you or your lawyer may contact the attorneys for 
the Medellin case. If you don't have a lawyer, 
there are groups that can find you one. We can give you the names of these 
groups.
The attorneys for the Medellin case will answer 
your questions about class membership. If they think we are wrong, we may 
change our minds and look at your case again. The attorney for the 
Medellin case is Legal Aid of Western Missouri, 600 
Lathrop Building, 1005 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64106-2216. 
Their telephone number is (816) 474-6750.
If You Have Any Questions
If you have any questions, you may call your local Social Security office. 
If you call or visit our office, please have this letter with you.
Also, if you plan to visit an office, you may call ahead to make an 
appointment. This will help us serve you more quickly when you arrive at 
the office.
|  |  | 
|  | (MAMPSC Manager's or FO Manager's Name) | 
|  | Manager | 
cc: Legal Aid of Western Missouri
Fill-ins
| 1 - | Choice 1: eligible to receive SSI payments | 
|  | Choice 2: due more SSI payments | 
|  |  | 
| 2 - | Choice 1: When we contacted you, you told us that the (food/food and shelter/shelter) you received did not have to be paid back. It was not intended to be a loan. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Choice 2: The amount of your income was still too high after we subtracted the amount we counted for the help (you) received. (List all other income counted.) | 
|  |  | 
|  | Choice 3: We find that (your) resources were more than $ (appropriate dollar amount for resource limit) for (month/year) through (month/year that resources exceed the limit). | 
|  |  | 
|  | For you to receive (more) SSI payments, the resources that (you) own cannot be worth more than $ (appropriate dollar amount). We call this amount the resource limit. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Resources are the things that (you) own such as cash, stocks, bank accounts, certain types of life insurance, buildings and land on which (you) do not live. We do not include as resources the home in which (you) live, one car used for necessary activities, and some other things. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Choice 4: To be eligible for Supplemental Security Income payments under the Medellin case, (you) must have lived in the State of Missouri for one or more months during the period July 12, 1990, through December 31, 1991. Our records show that (you) did not/do not meet this requirement because you were/are living in (name of State/foreign country). | 
|  |  | 
|  | Choice 5: (Other — fill in appropriate explanation.) | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
 
Attachment 4. Example: Notice of Important Information — No Relief to 
Survivor (Other Reason)
| Social Security Administration |  | 
| Supplemental Security Income |  | 
| Important Information |  | 
|  | Date: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Office Address: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Telephone Number: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Deceased Claimant's Name: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Social Security Number: | 
|  | 999-99-9999 | 
|  |  | 
| Survivor's Name |  | 
| Street Address |  | 
| City, State Zip Code |  | 
|  |  | 
You asked us to look at (name of deceased)'s Supplemental Security Income 
(SSI) case to see if we owe you money because of the 
Medellin court case. This case changes how we count 
help (name of deceased) received from someone (he/she) lived with if 
(he/she) did not pay for it. The Medellin case says 
that we should not count the help (name of deceased) received (food or 
shelter or both) if the help (he/she) received was intended to be a 
loan.
The information we have shows that you are not eligible to receive the SSI 
because of the Medellin case for the following 
reason(s): ____(1)____.
If You Disagree With Us
If you disagree with us, you or your lawyer may contact the attorneys for 
the Medellin case. If you don't have a lawyer, 
there are groups that can find you one. We can give you the name of these 
groups.
The attorneys for the Medellin case will answer 
your questions about class membership. If they think we are wrong, we may 
change our minds and look at your case again. The attorney for the 
Medellin case is Legal Aid of Western Missouri. The 
address is 600 Lathrop Building, 1005 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106-2216. Their telephone number is (816) 474-6750.
If You Have Any Questions
If you have any questions, you may call your local Social Security office. 
If you call or visit our office, please have this letter with you.
Also, if you plan to visit an office, you may call ahead to make an 
appointment. This will help us serve you more quickly when you arrive at 
the office.
|  |  | 
|  | (FO Manager's Name) | 
|  | Manager | 
cc: Legal Aid of Western Missouri
Fill-ins
— (name of deceased)      — 
(he/she)
| 1 - | Choice 1: When we contacted you, you told us that the (food/food and shelter/shelter) you received did not have to be paid back. It was not intended to be a loan. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Choice 2: The amount of (name of deceased)'s income was still too high after we subtracted the amount we counted for the help (he/she) received. (List all other income counted.) | 
|  |  | 
|  | Choice 3: We find that (name of deceased)'s resources were more than $ (appropriate dollar amount for resource limit) for (month/year) through (month/year that resources exceed the limit). | 
|  |  | 
|  | For (name of deceased) to have received (more) SSI payments, the resources that (he/she) owned could not be worth more than $ (appropriate dollar amount). We call this amount the resource limit. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Resources are the things that (he/she) owned such as cash, bank accounts, life insurance, buildings and land (he/she) did not live on and some other things. We do not include as resources the home a person lives in, one car used for necessary activities and some other things. | 
|  |  | 
|  | Choice 4: To be eligible for Supplemental Security Income payments under the Medellin case, (name of deceased) must have lived in the State of Missouri for one or more months during the period July 12, 1990, through December 31, 1991. Our records show that (he/she) did not meet this requirement because he/she was living in (name of State/foreign country). | 
|  |  | 
|  | Choice 5: (Other — fill in appropriate explanation.) | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
 
Attachment 5. Example: Notice to Deny Request for Payment of Underpayment — 
(Respondent Not an Eligible Survivor)
| Social Security Administration |  | 
| Supplemental Security Income |  | 
| Important Information |  | 
|  | Date: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Office Address: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Telephone Number: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Deceased Claimant's Name: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Social Security Number: | 
|  | 999-99-9999 | 
|  |  | 
| Responder's Name |  | 
| Street Address |  | 
| City, State Zip Code |  | 
|  |  | 
You asked us to look at ____(1)____ Supplemental Security Income (SSI) 
case to see if ____(2)____ was due any money because of the 
Medellin court case. Our records show you do not 
meet the requirements for receiving any SSI money that may be due 
____(3)____.
Who Can Receive SSI Due A Deceased Person
We can pay SSI money due a deceased person only to certain survivors. You 
must be a surviving spouse who was living with the SSI recipient at any 
time in the month the recipient died or have lived with him or her in any 
of the six months before the month of death.
If the SSI recipient was an SSI child, you must be a surviving parent(s) 
who was living with the child as described above.
Even if you meet the above requirements, you may still not receive the SSI 
money if we sent the first SSI payment to a State assistance agency. This 
can happen if the recipient had agreed in writing to have the first SSI 
payment sent to that agency because it paid money to him or her while 
waiting for SSI payments to begin.
Our records show you are not eligible to receive the SSI payment because 
____(4)____.
Do You Disagree With The Decision?
If you disagree with the decision, you have the right to appeal. We will 
review your case and consider any new facts you have.
- • - You have 60 days to ask for an appeal. 
- • - The 60 days start the day after you get this letter. We assume you got 
this letter 5 days after the date on it unless you show us that you did 
not get it within the 5-day period. 
- • - You must have to have a good reason for waiting more than 60 days to ask 
for an appeal. 
- • - To appeal, you must fill out a form called “Request for 
Reconsideration.” The form number is SSA-561. To get this form, 
contact one of our offices. We can help you fill out this form. 
How To Appeal
There are two ways to appeal. You can pick the one you want. If you meet with us in person, it may help us decide your case.
- • - Case Review. You have the right to review the facts in your file. You can 
give us more facts to add to your file. Then we'll decide your case again. 
You won't meet with the person who decides your case. This is the only 
kind of appeal you can have to appeal a medical decision. 
- • - Informal Conference. You'll meet with the person who decides your case. 
You can tell that person why you think you're right. You can give us more 
facts to help prove you're right. You can bring other people to help 
explain your case. 
If You Want Help With Your Appeal
You can have a friend, lawyer or someone else help you. There are groups 
that can help you find a lawyer or give you free legal services if you 
qualify. There are also lawyers who do not charge unless you win your 
appeal. Your local Social Security office has a list of groups that can 
help you with your appeal.
If you get someone to help you, you should let us know. If you hire 
someone, we must approve the fee before he or she can collect 
it.
You or your lawyer may also contact the attorney in the 
Medellin case, Legal Aid of Western Missouri. The 
address is 600 Lathrop Building, 1005 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106-2216. Their telephone number is (816) 474-6750.
If You Have Any Questions
If you have any questions, you may call, write or visit any Social 
Security office. If you call or visit our office, please have this letter 
with you.
Also, if you plan to visit an office, you may call ahead to make an 
appointment. This will help us serve you more quickly when you arrive at 
the office.
|  |  | 
|  | (FO Manager's Name) | 
|  | Manager | 
cc: Legal Aid of Western Missouri
Fill-ins
| 1  — | Name of deceased person, possessive | 
|  |  | 
| 2  — | Choice 1: he | 
|  | Choice 2: she | 
|  |  | 
| 3  — | Name of deceased person | 
|  |  | 
| 4  — | Give reason the respondent is not an eligible survivor. For example, if the respondent is the surviving parent of an adult child, explain that the child must have been under age 18/22 and living with the parent in the month of his or her death or in the preceding 6 months. See SI 02101.003ff. for other reasons for being ineligible. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
 
Attachment 6. Example: Notice of Change of Payment — No Current 
Eligibility
| Social Security Administration |  | 
| Supplemental Security Income |  | 
| Notice of Change In Payment |  | 
|  | Date: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Office Address: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Telephone Number: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Social Security Number: | 
|  | 999-99-9999 | 
|  |  | 
| Recipient |  | 
| Street Address |  | 
| City, State Zip Code |  | 
|  |  | 
We are writing to tell you about changes in your Supplemental Security 
Income (SSI) payments. The following chart shows the SSI money due you for 
the months we changed. As you can see from the chart, we are only changing 
your payments for months in the past. The rest of this letter will tell 
you more about this change.
Your Payments Will Be Changed as Follows:
| From | Through | Amount Due | 
|  |  | Each Month | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
| Month/Year | Month/Day/Year | $$.00 | 
|  |  |  | 
Information About Your Payments
We are sending you a check for $$.00. This is money due you for Month/Year 
through Month/Year.
You should receive the check no later than Month/Day/Year.
Why Your Payments Changed
We owe you SSI money because of a court case called 
Medellin. The Medellin case 
changes how we count help you received (food or shelter) from other people 
you lived with when you had agreed to pay these people back for the help. 
Because you had agreed to pay for the help you received, we should not 
have counted that help as income when we figured your SSI payments for the 
months shown above.
Your SSI Is Based On These Facts 
[Following is an example. The actual facts of the particular case should 
be included here.]
You had monthly income which must be considered in figuring your 
eligibility as follows:
- • - Your Social Security benefits—before deductions for Medicare 
premiums, if any—of $$.00 for Month/Year and $$.00 for 
Month/Year. 
Information About Your Back Payments
- • - We are sending you an SSI check for $$.00 in Month/Year. We will not count 
the back payment toward your resource limit for 6 months after you receive 
it. 
- • - On Month/Day/Year, we will then count any money that is left as part of 
your resources. But the things you buy with the money may count as 
resources the month after they are bought. You can ask us which things 
count as resources. You cannot get SSI if your resources are worth over 
$2,000. 
Things to Remember
- • - Your payments may change if your circumstances change. Therefore, you are 
required to report any change in your situation that may affect your SSI 
payment. For example, you should tell us if you move, if anyone else moves 
from or into your household, if your marital status changes, if income or 
resources for you or members of your household change, or if you go to 
work. 
- • - This decision refers only to your claim for SSI payments. 
- • - This determination replaces all previous determinations for the above 
periods. 
Do You Disagree With The Decision?
If you disagree with the decision, you have the right to appeal. A person 
who hasn't seen this case will look at it. That person will be an 
Administrative Law Judge. In the rest of our letter, we'll call this 
person an ALJ. The ALJ will correct mistakes and look at any new facts you 
have before deciding this case. We call this a hearing.
- • - You have 60 days to ask for a hearing. 
- • - The 60 days start the day after you get this letter. We assume you got 
this letter 5 days after the date on it unless you show us that you did 
not get it within the 5-day period. 
- • - You'll have to have a good reason for waiting more than 60 days to ask for 
a hearing. 
- • - You have to ask for a hearing in writing. We'll ask you to sign an SSA 
form HA-501, called “Request for Hearing.” Contact one of our 
offices if you want help. 
How A Hearing Works
A hearing works like this.
- • - The ALJ will tell you the time and place for the hearing. 
- • - The ALJ will explain the law in your case. The ALJ will state the known 
facts and tell you what has to be decided. 
- • - You can tell the ALJ why you think we're wrong. You can give the ALJ more 
facts. You can bring people to say why you're right. 
- • - The ALJ can make people come to your hearing in person and bring important 
papers. You can question these people at your hearing. 
- • - We'll ask if you want to go to the hearing in person. If you say you want 
to go, you should attend if at all possible. If you change your mind or if 
you can't get to the hearing, you should tell us. You should know that 
your being there may help the ALJ decide your case. 
If You Want Help With The Hearing
You can have a friend, lawyer or someone else help you. There are groups 
that can find you a lawyer or give you free legal services if you qualify. 
There are also lawyers who do not charge unless you win your appeal. Your 
local Social Security office has a list of groups that can help you with 
your appeal.
If you get someone to help you, you should let us know. If you hire 
someone, we must approve the fee before he or she can collect 
it.
You or your lawyer may also contact the attorney in the 
Medellin case, Legal Aid of Western Missouri. The 
address is 600 Lathrop Building, 1005 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106-2216. Their telephone number is (816) 474-6750.
If You Have Any Questions
If you have any questions, you may call, write, or visit any Social 
Security office. If you call or visit our office, please have this letter 
with you and ask for (Claims Representative's name). (His/Her) telephone 
number is (xxx) xxx-xxxx.
Also, if you plan to visit an office, you may call ahead to make an 
appointment. This will help us serve you more quickly when you arrive at 
the office.
cc: Legal Aid of Western Missouri
 
Attachment 7. Example: Notice of Underpayment Due a Survivor
| Social Security Administration |  | 
| Supplemental Security Income |  | 
| Important Information |  | 
|  | Date: | 
|  | Office Address: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Telephone Number: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Deceased Claimant's Name: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Social Security Number: | 
|  | 999-99-9999 | 
|  |  | 
| Survivor's Name |  | 
| Street Address |  | 
| City, State Zip Code |  | 
|  |  | 
We are writing to tell you that we can pay you some Supplemental Security 
Income (SSI) money we owe to (name of deceased). The following chart shows 
the SSI money due (name of the deceased) for the months we changed. As you 
can see from the chart, we are only changing (name of deceased)'s payments 
for months in the past. The rest of this letter will tell you more about 
this.
Information About Your Payments
| From | Through | Amount Due | 
|  |  | Each Month | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
|  |  |  | 
| Month/Year | Month/Day/Year | $$.00 | 
|  |  |  | 
We are sending you a check for $$.00. This is money due (name of deceased) 
for Month/Year through Month/Year. We can pay this money to you because 
you are (name of deceased)'s surviving (spouse/parent).
You should receive the check no later than Month/Day/Year.
Why We Owe You SSI
We owe you SSI money because of a court case called 
Medellin. Also, you are (his/her) surviving 
(spouse/parent). The Medellin case changes how we 
count help (name of deceased) received (food or shelter) from other people 
(name of deceased) lived with when (he/she) had agreed to pay these people 
back for the help. Because (he/she) had agreed to pay for the help 
(he/she) received, we should not have counted that help as income when we 
figured (his/her) SSI payments for the months shown above.
The SSI Payment Is Based On These Facts
(Name of deceased) had monthly income which must be considered in figuring 
(his/her) SSI as follows: 
[Case facts would be tailored for actual notice].
- • - (His/Her) Social Security benefits—before deductions for Medicare 
premiums, if any—of $$.00 for Month/Year and $$.00 for 
Month/Year. 
Do You Disagree With The Decision?
If you disagree with the decision, you have the right to appeal. We will 
review your case and consider any new facts you have.
- • - You have 60 days to ask for an appeal. 
- • - The 60 days start the day after you get this letter. We assume you got 
this letter 5 days after the date on it unless you show us that you did 
not get it within the 5-day period. 
- • - You must have to have a good reason for waiting more than 60 days to ask 
for an appeal. 
- • - To appeal, you must fill out a form called “Request for 
Reconsideration.” The form number is SSA-561. To get this form, 
contact one of our offices. We can help you fill out this form. 
How To Appeal
There are two ways to appeal. You can pick the one you want. If you meet with us in person, it may help us decide your case.
- • - Case Review. You have the right to review the facts in your file. You can 
give us more facts to add to your file. Then we'll decide your case again. 
You won't meet with the person who decides your case. This is the only 
kind of appeal you can have to appeal a medical decision. 
- • - Informal Conference. You'll meet with the person who decides your case. 
You can tell that person why you think you're right. You can give us more 
facts to help prove you're right. You can bring other people to help 
explain your case. 
If You Want Help Your Appeal
You can have a friend, lawyer or someone else help you. There are groups 
that can find you a lawyer or give you free legal services if you qualify. 
There are also lawyers who do not charge unless you win your appeal. Your 
local Social Security office has a list of groups that can help you with 
your appeal.
If you get someone to help you, you should let us know. If you hire 
someone, we must approve the fee before he or she can collect it.
You or your lawyer may also contact the attorney in the 
Medellin case, Legal Aid of Western Missouri. The 
address is 600 Lathrop Building, 1005 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106-2216. Their telephone number is (816) 474-6750.
If You Have Any Questions
If you have any questions, you may call, write or visit any Social 
Security office. If you call or visit our office, please have this letter 
with you and ask for (Name of SSA Representative). The telephone number is 
shown at the top of the letter.
Also, if you plan to visit an office, you may call ahead to make an 
appointment. This will help us serve you more quickly when you arrive at 
the office.
cc: Legal Aid of Western Missouri
Fill-ins
— (name of deceased)
— (he/she)
— (his/her)
— (spouse/parent)
— (name of SSA representative)
 
Attachment 8. Example: Notice of Important Information — No Relief (FO 
Determines No Loan Exists)
| Social Security Administration |  | 
| Supplemental Security Income |  | 
| Important Information |  | 
|  | Date: | 
|  | Office Address: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Telephone Number: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Social Security Number: | 
|  | 999-99-9999 | 
|  |  | 
| Claimant |  | 
| Street Address |  | 
| City, State Zip Code |  | 
|  |  | 
You asked us to look at your Supplemental Security Income (SSI) case to 
see if we owe you money because of the Medellin 
court case. This case changes how we count help you receive from someone 
you live with if you do not pay for it. The 
Medellin case says that we should not count the 
help you received (food or shelter or both) if the help you received was 
intended to be a loan.
The information we have shows that you are not ____(1)____ because of the 
Medellin case for the following 
reason(s):
You did not receive a loan of food or shelter because 
____(2)____.
Do You Disagree With The Decision?
If you disagree with the decision, you have the right to appeal. A person 
who hasn't seen this case will look at it. That person will be a 
Administrative Law Judge. In the rest of our letter we'll call this person 
an ALJ. The ALJ will correct mistakes and look at any new facts you have 
before deciding this case. We call this a hearing.
- • - You have 60 days to ask for a hearing. 
- • - The 60 days start the day after you get this letter. We assume you got 
this letter 5 days after the date on it unless you show us that you did 
not get it within the 5-day period. 
- • - You'll have to have a good reason for waiting more than 60 days to ask for 
a hearing. 
- • - You have to ask for a hearing in writing. We'll ask you to sign an SSA 
form HA-501, called “Request for Hearing.” Contact one of our 
offices if you want help. 
How A Hearing Works
A hearing works like this.
- • - The ALJ will tell you the time and place for the hearing. 
- • - The ALJ will explain the law in your case. The ALJ will state the known 
facts and tell you what has to be decided. 
- • - You can tell the ALJ why you think we're wrong. You can give the ALJ more 
facts. You can bring people to say why you're right. 
- • - The ALJ can make people come to your hearing in person and bring important 
papers. You can question these people at your hearing. 
- • - We'll ask if you want to go to the hearing in person. If you say you want 
to go, you should attend if at all possible. If you change your mind or if 
you can't get to the hearing, you should tell us. You should know that 
your being there may help the ALJ decide your case. 
If You Want Help With The Hearing
You can have a friend, lawyer or someone else help you. There are groups 
that can find you a lawyer or give you free legal services if you qualify. 
There are also lawyers who do not charge unless you win your appeal. Your 
local Social Security office has a list of groups that can help you with 
your appeal.
If you get someone to help you, you should let us know. If you hire 
someone, we must approve the fee before he or she can collect 
it.
You or your lawyer may also contact the attorney in the 
Medellin case, Legal Aid of Western Missouri. The 
address is 600 Lathrop Building, 1005 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106-2216. Their telephone number is (816) 474-6750.
If You Have Any Questions
If you have any questions, you may call, write, or visit any Social 
Security office. If you call or visit our office, please have this letter 
with you and ask for (Claims Representative's name). (His/Her) telephone 
number is (xxx) xxx-xxxx.
Also, if you plan to visit an office, you may call ahead to make an 
appointment. This will help us serve you more quickly when you arrive at 
the office.
|  |  | 
|  | (FO Manager's Name) | 
|  | Manager | 
cc: Legal Aid of Western Missouri
Fill-ins
| 1  — | Choice 1: eligible to receive SSI payments | 
|  |  | 
|  | Choice 2: due more SSI payments | 
|  |  | 
| 2  — | Fill in reason no loan was found to exist. | 
|  |  | 
|  |  | 
 
Attachment 9. Example: Notice of Important Information — No Relief to 
Survivor (FO Determines No Loan Exists)
| Social Security Administration |  | 
| Supplemental Security Income |  | 
| Important Information |  | 
|  | Date: | 
|  | Office Address: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Telephone Number: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Deceased Claimant's Name: | 
|  |  | 
|  | Social Security Number: | 
|  | 999-99-9999 | 
|  |  | 
| Survivor's Name |  | 
| Street Address |  | 
| City, State Zip Code |  | 
|  |  | 
You asked us to look at (name of deceased)'s Supplemental Security Income 
(SSI) case to see if we owe you money because of the 
Medellin court case. This case changes how we count 
help (name of deceased) received from someone (he/she) lived with if 
(he/she) did not pay for it. The Medellin case says 
that we should not count the help (name of deceased) received (food or 
shelter or both) if the help (he/she) received was intended to be a 
loan.
The information we have shows that you are not due SSI because of the 
Medellin case for the following 
reason(s):
(Name of deceased) did not receive a loan of food or shelter because 
____(1)____.
Do You Disagree With The Decision?
If you disagree with the decision, you have the right to appeal. A person 
who hasn't seen this case will look at it. That person will be a 
Administrative Law Judge. In the rest of our letter we'll call this person 
an ALJ. The ALJ will correct mistakes and look at any new facts you have 
before deciding this case. We call this a hearing.
- • - You have 60 days to ask for a hearing. 
- • - The 60 days start the day after you get this letter. We assume you got 
this letter 5 days after the date on it unless you show us that you did 
not get it within the 5-day period. 
- • - You'll have to have a good reason for waiting more than 60 days to ask for 
a hearing. 
- • - You have to ask for a hearing in writing. We'll ask you to sign an SSA 
form HA-501, called “Request for Hearing.” Contact one of our 
offices if you want help. 
How A Hearing Works
A hearing works like this:
- • - The ALJ will tell you the time and place for the hearing. 
- • - The ALJ will explain the law in your case. The ALJ will state the known 
facts and tell you what has to be decided. 
- • - You can tell the ALJ why you think we're wrong. You can give the ALJ more 
facts. You can bring people to say why you're right. 
- • - The ALJ can make people come to your hearing in person and bring important 
papers. You can question these people at your hearing. 
- • - We'll ask if you want to go to the hearing in person. If you say you want 
to go, you should attend if at all possible. If you change your mind or if 
you can't get to the hearing, you should tell us. You should know that 
your being there may help the ALJ decide your case. 
If You Want Help With The Hearing
You can have a friend, lawyer or someone else help you. There are groups 
that can find you a lawyer or give you free legal services if you qualify. 
There are also lawyers who do not charge unless you win your appeal. Your 
local Social Security office has a list of groups that can help you with 
your appeal.
If you get someone to help you, you should let us know. If you hire 
someone, we must approve the fee before he or she can collect 
it.
You or your lawyer may also contact the attorney in the 
Medellin case, Legal Aid of Western Missouri. The 
address is 600 Lathrop Building, 1005 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 
64106-2216. Their telephone number is (816) 474-6750.
If You Have Any Questions
If you have any questions, you may call, write or visit any Social 
Security office. If you call or visit our office, please have this letter 
with you and ask for (name of SSA Representative). (His/Her) telephone 
number is (xxx) xxx-xxxx.
Also, if you plan to visit an office, you may call ahead to make an 
appointment. This will help us serve you more quickly when you arrive at 
the office.
|  |  | 
|  | (FO Manager's Name) | 
|  | Manager | 
cc: Legal Aid of Western Missouri
Fill-ins
— (name of deceased)
— (he/she)
— (name of SSA representative)
1—Fill in reason no loan was found to exist.