For disability or blindness claims, some rules we use to evaluate medical and nonmedical evidence will depend on a claim’s filing date. Adjudicators at all adjudicative levels must identify whether the filing date of the claim is before March 27, 2017, or whether the filing date of the claim is on or after March 27, 2017.

For more information about how the Field Office (FO) determines the filing date of a claim, see GN 00204.007.

The filing date of a claim is relevant for the following evidence rules:

• •

  The medical sources who are acceptable medical sources (AMS) only for claims filed on or after March 27, 2017. See DI 22505.003;

• •

  The definition of these categories of evidence: medical opinions, opinions, and other medical evidence. See DI 24503.005;

• •

  The rules for considering medical opinions and prior administrative medical findings. See DI 24503.025 and DI 24503.035;

• •

  The articulation requirements for medical opinions and prior administrative medical findings. See DI 24503.030 and DI 24503.035;

• •

  The articulation requirements for statements on issues reserved to the Commissioner. See DI 24503.040; and

• •

  The articulation requirements for decisions from other governmental agencies and nongovernmental entities. See DI 24503.045.

The purposes of the Medical Evidence regulation indicator (MedEv) in the eView and the electronic claims analysis tool (eCAT) headers are to:

• •

  Help adjudicators understand which set of rules to use; and

• •

  Direct systems at the Office of Hearings Operations (OHO) to produce correct notice language and display correct decisional screens that correspond to the filing date.

This indicator is set when the FO transfers the claim to the Disability Determination Services (DDS) and will appear in the eView and eCAT headers for all claim types.

• •

  For claims filed before March 27, 2017, the indicator should say “MedEv: Prior Rules.”

• •

  For claims filed on or after March 27, 2017, the indicator should say “MedEv: Current Rules.”

Generally, the earliest filing date displayed in the eView Medical Evidence indicator and in eCAT is the correct filing date to use to determine which set of rules to use to evaluate evidence in a claim. Therefore, in most claims, the eView indicator will display the correct filing date information to use to determine which rules apply when evaluating evidence.

However, the indicator may display incorrect filing date information when:

• •

  The claimant submits an application for a second claim after the FO transfers the first claim to the DDS, or

• •

  We previously made a determination or decision on a claim filed by the claimant.

Follow the guidance in DI 24503.050D in this section to determine which set of rules to follow.

Follow the guidance in the filing date scenarios in DI 24503.050D in this section to determine which set of rules to follow.

An adjudicator must use the correct set of rules related to the filing date of a claim to evaluate evidence before issuing a determination or decision.

• •

  Adjudicate a claim(s) with a filing date before March 27, 2017, using the “prior rules.”

• •

  Adjudicate a claim(s) with a filing date on or after March 27, 2017, using the “current rules.”

Follow the guidance in DI 24503.050D in this section to determine which set of rules to follow.

An adjudicator must ensure that the eView “MedEv” indicator shown displays the correct value based on the filing date of the claim before issuing the determination or decision.

If an adjudicator believes that the indicator’s value may be incorrect, contact the FO to resolve any issues, as appropriate.

If the indicator displays an incorrect value, the adjudicator must manually correct the indicator’s value in eView by clicking on the eView “MedEv” indicator hyperlink to change the value displayed. It is not possible to correct the “MedEv” indicator value shown in eCAT.

For the situations in DI 24503.050A.2, if the filing date of the claim is:

• •

  Before March 27, 2017, use the prior rules; or

• •

  On or after March 27, 2017, use the current rules.

If you reopen a claim, use the original filing date of the earlier claim as the filing date for the reopened claim.

Do not reopen a claim if all of the following apply:

• •

  The claim uses the “prior rules,” and

• •

  New and material evidence is the reason that justifies reopening of the claim, and

• •

  The new and material evidence is objective medical evidence from a medical source who is an acceptable medical source only for claims filed on or after March 27, 2017, and

• •

  That objective medical evidence would be used to establish the existence of an impairment at step 2 of the sequential evaluation process.

For more information about reopening, see:

• •

  DI 27501.005 Reopening and Revising a Determination or Decision

• •

  DI 27505.001 Conditions for Reopening a Final Determination or Decision

If a claimant files a claim that meets the criteria for adoption of a prior medical determination or decision that has already been decided (i.e., collateral estoppel), use the filing date rules in effect for the earlier determination or decision. To determine the filing date for the earlier claim, see the Form SSA-831, Items 3 and 34, (Disability Determination and Transmittal).

For more information on collateral estoppel, see DI 27515.000.

If a claimant submits a Title II claim on or after March 27, 2017, for the same period as a previous Title II claim filed prior to March 27, 2017, and there is no new and material evidence, res judicata applies. The medical evidence rules changes are not considered less restrictive and therefore do not affect the ability to apply res judicata. For more information, see Disability Determination Services (DDS) Medical Evaluation Criteria to Determine Applicability of Res Judicata in DI 27516.010.

The OQR will return a claim(s) under its jurisdiction to the adjudicative component with cited deficiencies and corrective action when the claimant files a subsequent claim with a protective filing date that changes the set of evidence rules that the adjudicative component should use for the claim(s).

The OQR will return the claim(s) to the adjudicative component to allow the adjudicative component to adjudicate the earlier claim(s) under the appropriate rules. For more information, see Adjudicating Component Actions on Deficient Cases in subchapter DI 30005.000.

The same rules will apply throughout the entire CDR determination or decision, including the appeals process. For more information on the CDR evaluation process, see DI 28005.000.

NOTE: The “MedEV” indicator in some CDRs will erroneously display “Prior Rules” when in fact the current rules apply. Be aware of this possibility and remember to change the indicator value when appropriate.

When determining which set of evidence rules to follow, we consider an age 18 redetermination to be a new claim (not a CDR) filed on the day a person attains age 18. Therefore, if the individual’s date of birth is before March 28, 1999, use the prior rules for the age 18 redetermination. If the individual’s date of birth is on or after March 28, 1999, use the current rules for the age 18 redetermination.

For more information, see DI 23570.000.

When determining which set of evidence rules to follow, we consider a request for EXR to be a new claim filed on the day we receive the request. Therefore, if we receive the request for EXR on or after March 27, 2017, use the current rules.

For more information, see DI 13050.000.